PROPORTIONAL REASONING: INSIGHTS FROM STUDENTS’ EARLY ATTEMPTS AT QUANTIFYING IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL LITERACY PROBLEMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.35828

Keywords:

Early Attempts at Quantifying, Mathematical Literacy, Problems, Proportional Reasoning, Solving

Abstract

This research aims to explore students’ proportional reasoning at the early attempts at quantifying stage when students face proportional situations, especially mathematical literacy problems. This research uses a qualitative research approach involving grade 9 junior high school. Data was collected by providing mathematical literacy problems containing proportional situations and in-depth interviews with research subjects. The research results show that students in the early attempts at quantifying stage begin to identify important variables, recognize regularities, and develop plans to solve problems. Students apply inappropriate addition relationships in proportional situations, add or subtract numbers without understanding the concept of comparison, and have a sense of comparing sizes that are bigger and smaller, but students have limitations in understanding the concept of proportionality, especially in recognizing when comparison should be used, students try to identify comparative patterns, students have difficulty connecting patterns to multiplicative forms; able to conclude, but the conclusions are wrong due to limitations in understanding the concept of proportionality which results in inaccurate results. This study provides a novel contribution by specifically focusing on the “early attempts at quantifying” stage, a crucial yet underexamined phase in proportional reasoning development. The findings fill a gap in understanding how students transition from additive to multiplicative reasoning when faced with real-world mathematical problems. The implication is that assistance is needed in the form of exercises that increase students' understanding and sensitivity to multiplicative situations and relationships between variables in solving mathematical literacy problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nego Linuhung, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Metro, Indonesia

Purwanto Purwanto, Universitas Negeri Malang

Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Sukoriyanto Sukoriyanto, Universitas Negeri Malang

Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Sudirman Sudirman, Universitas Negeri Malang

Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Mohd Isha Awang, Universiti Utara Malaysia

Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia

References

Amador, J. M., Glassmeyer, D., & Brakoniecki, A. (2024). Teachers’ noticing of proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, January. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09625-7

Anugradia, N., Kruehong, T., & Alvarez, J. L. (2025). Students’ evaluation of the effectiveness of open access journals in accelerating paper completion. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 3(1), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v3i1.1462

Arican, M. (2019). Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of and Abilities to Differentiate Proportional Relationships from Nonproportional Relationships. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9931-x

Baxter, G. P., & Junker, B. (2001). Designing cognitive-developmental assessments: a case study in proportional reasoning. In Cognitive-Developmental Assessments (Issue April, pp. 1–20). National Council for Measurement in Education. http://bit.ly/3ZkWa7L

Castro, R. (2025). The effects of chemistry virtual laboratories in academic achievement of secondary level learners: A meta-analysis. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379

Citrawan, I. W., Mukminin, A., Widana, I. W., Sumandya, I. W., Widana, I. N. S., Arief, H., Razak, R. A., Hadiana, D., & Meter, W. (2024). Special Education Teachers’ Ability in Literacy and Numeracy Assessments Based on Local Wisdom. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32608

Copur-Gencturk, Y., Baek, C., & Doleck, T. (2023). A Closer Look at Teachers’ Proportional Reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10249-7

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research. Planing, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. In Boston. Pearson.

de la Cruz, J. A., & Garney, S. (2016). Saving money using proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21(9), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.21.9.0552

Fielding-Wells, J., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2014). Inquiry pedagogy to promote emerging proportional reasoning in primary students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0111-6

Firmansyah, E., Baluta, I. B., & Elfaituri, K. (2024). The correlation between students’ problem-solving abilities and their mathematical thinking in high school mathematics education. Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i2.1343

Frith, V., & Lloyd, P. (2016). Proportional reasoning ability of school leavers aspiring to higher education in South Africa. Pythagoras, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v37i1.317

Galdonez, D. P. (2025). Exploring the Experiences of STEM students in writing research: insights, challenges, and strategies. Journal of Basic Education Research, 6(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v6i1.1150

Habibi, M. W., Jiyane, L., & Özşen, Z. (2024). Learning revolution: The positive impact of computer simulations on science achievement in madrasah ibtidaiyah. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 2(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i1.976

Halimah, H., Putri , D. E., Wulandari, W., Adewumi, S. E., & Arce-Calderón, X. (2024). Contextual pop up book as an innovative learning media in social science subjects in elementary schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 2(2), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i2.1121

Harris, K., Bauer, M., & Redman, M. (2015). Cognitive based developmental models used as a link between formative and summative assessment. Iaea, October, 1–10. https://tinyurl.com/yutyazpt

Harsiati, T., & Priyatni, E. T. (2017). Karakteristik Tes Literasi Membaca pada Programme for International Student Asessment (PISA). Bibliotika : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan Dan Informasi. https://doi.org/10.17977/um008v1i22017p001

Hendroanto, A., Istiandaru, A., Syakrina, N., Setyawan, F., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, A. S. E. (2018). How Students Solves PISA Tasks: An Overview of Students’ Mathematical Literacy. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.10713

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2023). Costa Rican students’ proportional reasoning and comparing probabilities in spinners. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13869

Hidayat, R., Imami, M. K. W., Liu, S., Qudratuddarsi, H., Rashid, M., & Saad, M. (2024). Validity of Engagement Instrument During Online Learning in Mathematics Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(2), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.34453

Im, S. H., & Jitendra, A. K. (2020). Analysis of proportional reasoning and misconceptions among students with mathematical learning disabilities. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57(March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100753

Izzatin, M., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, Kartono, Dwidayati, N., & Dewi, N. R. (2021). Students’ proportional reasoning in solving non-routine problems based on mathematical disposition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042114

Johar, R., Yusniarti, S., & Saminan. (2018). The analysis of proportional reasoning problem in the Indonesian mathematics textbook for the junior high school. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4145.55-68

Julie, H, Sanjaya, F., & Anggoro, A. Y. (2019). Programme for international students assessments (PISA). In Deepublish Publisher. https://rb.gy/2c8ud

Julie, Hongki, Sanjaya, F., & Anggoro, A. . Y. (2017). The students’ ability in mathematical literacy for the quantity, and the change and relationship problems on the PISA adaptation test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012089

Kamid, Ramalisa, Y., Rohati, Ningsih, R., & Nabilah, B. S. (2024). Cognitive Psychology Study and Mathematical Process Skills on Students’ Answers in Mathematics Learning in Comparative Material. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(2), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.37240

Khasawneh, A. A., Al-Barakat, A. A., & Almahmoud, S. A. (2022). The Effect of Error Analysis-Based Learning on Proportional Reasoning Ability of Seventh-Grade Students. Frontiers in Education, 7(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.899288

Kholid, M. N., Rofi’ah, F., Ishartono, N., Waluyo, M., Maharani, S., Swastika, A., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2022). What are students’ difficulties in implementing mathematical literacy skills for solving PISA-like problem? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5057

Laksono, P. J., Suhadi, S., & Efriani, A. (2025). Unveiling STEM education conceptions: insights from pre-service mathematics and science teachers. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1387

Larasati, S., & Rianasari, V. (2017). Mathematical Literacy Profile of Grade Viii Students of Smp Pangudi Luhur 1 Yogyakarta Using Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia Approach. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 1(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.2017.010106

Mabeza, M. R. A. (2025). Students’ gendered expectations and evaluation on thesis advising skills and mentoring practices of the local thesis advisory committee (LTAC) in camarines norte state college. Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE), 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v6i1.1172

Mardiati, D. C., Alorgbey, B., & Zarogi, A. B. (2024). The relationship between educational level and the role of parents with learning achievement in mathematics. Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i1.983

Miharja, M. A., Bulayi, M., & Triet, L. V. M. (2024). Realistic mathematics education: Unlocking problem-solving potential in students. Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 2(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v2i1.1344

Misnasanti, Utami, R. W., & Suwanto, F. R. (2017). Problem based learning to improve proportional reasoning of students in mathematics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995129

Nelson, G., Hunt, J. H., Martin, K., Patterson, B., & Khounmeuang, A. (2022). Current Knowledge and Future Directions: Proportional Reasoning Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities and Mathematics Difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720932850

Nugraha, Y., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, & Chandra, T. D. (2023). Proportional and non-proportional situation: How to make sense of them. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(2), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.2.355

OECD. (2021). PISA 2021 mathematics framework (draft). OECD Publishing, November 2018. https://pisa2021-maths.oecd.org/files/PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework Draft.pdf

OECD. (2022). Pisa 2022 Mathematics Framework (Draft). OECD Publishing, November 2018.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en.

Ojose, B. (2015). Proportional reasoning and related concepts: Analysis of gaps and understandings of middle grade students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030206

Pillai, S. P. M., Galloway, G., & Adu, E. O. (2017). Comparative Studies of Mathematical Literacy/Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1–3), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2017.1311625

Prayitno, A., Rossa, A., Widayanti, F. D., Rahayuningsih, S., Hamid, A., & Baidawi, M. (2018). Characteristics of students’ proportional reasoning in solving missing value problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012021

Putra, Y. Y., & Vebrian, R. (2020). Literasi Matematika (Mathematical Literacy) Soal Matematika Model Pisa Menggunakan Konteks Bangka Belitung. Yogyakarta, Deepublish Publisher.

Qiu, L., Ikeda, F., & Yamashita, N. (2025). Development and validation of a taxonomy for specific questions based on deficiencies in logical reasoning. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1102

Rachmanto, T. B., & Akande, I. O. (2024). Utilization of information technology in increasing the effectiveness of citizenship Learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 2(2), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i2.1140

Ramful, A., & Narod, F. B. (2014). Proportional reasoning in the learning of chemistry: Levels of complexity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0110-7

Randewijk, E. M. (2010). Developing proportional reasoning in Mathematical Literacy students. In Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Stellenbosch (Issue March, pp. 1–160). http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/3185

Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10649

Sari, Y. M., Fiangga, S., El Milla, Y. I., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2023). Exploring students’ proportional reasoning in solving guided-unguided area conservation problem: A case of Indonesian students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.V14I2.PP375-394

Sari, R., Omeiza, I. I., & Mwakifuna, M. A. (2023). The influence of number dice games in improving early childhood mathematical logic in early childhood education. Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 1(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i2.776

Sari, S. A., & Oransa, M. A. (2025). Qualitative analysis of the implementation of inquiry-based physics learning tools on strengthening character and improving learning outcomes. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 6(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v6i1.1469

Sarnoko, Asrowi, Gunarhadi, & Usodo, B. (2024). an Analysis of the Application of Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Model in Mathematics for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(1), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32057

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. In OECD Publishing (Issue 5). www.oecd.org/termsandconditions

She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and mathematics literacy: PISA for better school education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1

Stacey, K. (2015). The International Assessment of Mathematical Literacy: PISA 2012 Framework and Items. In Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43

Sulistyani, D. C., & Mochama, O. E. (2025). Exploring the utilization of ICT in physics learning at senior high schools in demak: opportunities and challenges. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 6(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v6i1.1065

Supply, A. S., Vanluydt, E., Van Dooren, W., & Onghena, P. (2023). Out of proportion or out of context? Comparing 8- to 9-year-olds’ proportional reasoning abilities across fair-sharing, mixtures, and probability contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10212-5

Syutaridho, Ramury, F., & Nurhijah. (2023). the Influence of Indonesia’S Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Students’ Creative Thinking Ability. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 7(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i2.28700

Temizer, F. A. (2022). Reasoning with ratios as multiplicative comparisons. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, August, 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09549-0

Tep, S., Loch, R., & Pok, V. (2025). How principals’ instructional leadership influence teachers’ self-efficacy. Journal of Basic Education Research, 6(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v6i1.1421

Thurn, C., Nussbaumer, D., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2022). The Role of Prior Knowledge and Intelligence in Gaining from a Training on Proportional Reasoning. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020031

Vanluydt, E., De Keyser, L., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2023). Stimulating early proportional reasoning: an intervention study in second graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00696-3

Vanluydt, Elien, Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Early stages of proportional reasoning: a cross-sectional study with 5- to 9-year-olds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00434-8

Yohanie, D. D., Botchway, G. A., Nkhwalume, A. A., & Arrazaki, M. (2023). Thinking process of mathematics education students in problem solving proof. Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education, 1(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i1.611

Walle, J. A. Van De. (2007). Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah: pengembangan dan pengajaran, jilid 2 edisi ke enam. In Jakarta: Erlangga. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS5236.slims-57591?widget=1

Zakiyah, Z., Boonma , K., & Collado, R. (2024). Physics learning innovation: song and animation-based media as a learning solution for mirrors and lenses for junior high school students. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 2(2), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i2.1062

Downloads

Published

2025-06-08

How to Cite

Linuhung, N., Purwanto, P., Sukoriyanto, S., Sudirman, S., & Awang, M. I. (2025). PROPORTIONAL REASONING: INSIGHTS FROM STUDENTS’ EARLY ATTEMPTS AT QUANTIFYING IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL LITERACY PROBLEMS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(2), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.35828

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Science Education