STUDENT CONTRIBUTION INDEX (SCI) IN SCIENCE: A MEASURE OF CONTRIBUTION TO MITIGATING SOCIAL LOAFING AND FREE-RIDING IN TEAM PROJECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.42064Keywords:
Collaborative Learning, Free-riding, Group Work, Social Loafing, Student Contribution Index (SCI), TeamworkAbstract
In this study, we introduce the Student Contribution Index (SCI) to measure these contributions. The purpose of this quantitative study is to test the validity of SCI as a measure of task identifiability and to determine the student satisfaction with SCI-based assessments. To collect the data, 52 students were split into high and low identifiability conditions. Both groups worked on a project and completed SCI once (LI group) and twice (HI group). We measured the SCI variability using an F-test at the significance level of 0.05. Furthermore, a group project of 113 students was assessed using SCI. Students completed an evaluation form to measure procedural fairness, distributive fairness, and satisfaction. We then analyzed the correlations between these variables using Pearson's Correlation. The results show that the variability in SCI of the HI group was negligible (SD = 0), indicating that all students contributed equally to the project. Meanwhile, a variability was observed in the LI condition (SD = 0.08), suggesting that SCI was a valid measurement. Additionally, students were generally satisfied with the assessment (M = 4.40), and a significant correlation was observed between the variables. This study presents a novel method for assigning grades to group members in group projects, taking into account each member’s individual contribution. As a result, fairness in grading can be achieved, and educators can discourage social loafing and free-reading behavior.
Downloads
References
Agresti, A. (2019). An introduction to categorical analysis (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Benning, T. M. (2024). Reducing free-riding in group projects in line with students’ preferences: Does it matter if there is more at stake? Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221118864
Beltran, K. A. (2025). Development and validation of microbiology and parasitology laboratory manual for science education. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i2.1543
Berhanu, Z. K. (2023). Reducing social loafing in teamwork among university students: Experiences of reflective teaching. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 30(2), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/V30I02/69-87
Bingjie, L., Chunyi, Y., Haoyan, L., Qing, C., & Xuelei, M. (2022). Impact of team-based learning versus lecture-based learning on Chinese radiology education: A scoping review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open, 12(2), Article 215824402210917. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091724
Bokhari, S. A. A., & Aftab, M. (2022). Personality traits and social loafing among employees working in teams at small and medium enterprises: A cultural perspective data from emerging economies. DATA IN BRIEF, 42, Article 108085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108085
Bui, D. L. T., & Nguyen, M. T. H. (2024). Matches and mismatches in perceptions of group work: Voices from EFL teachers and students. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28110a6
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/135625100114885
Colquitt, A. J. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
Crespi, C. M. (2025). Power and sample size in R. Taylor & Francis Group.
Darby, S., O'Hanlon, D., Casterton, S., Harding, N., O'Brien, A.-M., Quinn, G., Urmeneta, O., & Tweddell, S. (2023). Improved learning outcomes and teacher experience: A qualitative study of team-based learning in secondary schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), Article 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100590
de Saint Léger, D., & Mullan, K. (2014). "A good all-round French workout" or "a massive stress"?: Perceptions of group work among tertiary learners of French. System, 44, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.005
DeVries, J. M., Szardenings, C., Doebler, P., & Gebhardt, M. (2020). Individualized assignments, group work and discussions: How they interact with class size, low socioeconomic status, and second language learners. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00065
Dommeyer, C. J. (2007). Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302019
Doo, Y. M., Zhu, M., & Bonk, J. C. (2023). Influence of self-directed learning on learning outcomes in MOOCs: A meta-analysis. Distance Education, 44(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2155618
Dzulfikar, A., Turmudi, T., Herman, T., & Kusnandi, K. (2025). How ICT supports the mathematical problem-solving learning process of secondary school students: A systematic literature Review. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 6(3), 924-936. https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i3.1649
El Massah, S. S. (2018). Addressing free riders in collaborative group work. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1223-1244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2017-0012
Endra, K., & Villaflor, G. M. (2024). Integration of the POE model and metaphoral thinking in student worksheets: improving mathematical reasoning abilities in the modern education era. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 2(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i1.981
Gabelica, C., De Maeyer, S., & Schippers, M. C. (2021). Taking a free ride: How team learning affects social loafing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 716-733. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000713
Gao, X., Yan, D., Zhang, Y., Ruan, X., Kang, T., Wang, R., Zheng, Q., Chen, S., & Zhai, J. (2024). Comparison of the impact of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on nursing students' core competencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 76, Article 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103945
Gedamu, A. D., & Shewangezaw, G. L. (2022). Secondary school teachers' management and assessment strategies of free-riders in group work: implication for engaging the disengaged. Heliyon, 8(6), Article e09742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09742
Gorgulu, R., Gokcek, E., & Eyler, B. (2021). The moderating role of narcissism on the reciprocal relationship between self-efficacy and performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 52, 134-148. https://doi.org/10.7352/ijsp.2021.52.134
Gunning, K. T., Conlan, A. X., Collins, K. P., Bellgrove, A., Antlej, K., Cardilini, A. P. A., & Fraser, L. C. (2022). Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00340-y
Guzmán, S. G. (2018). Monte Carlo evaluations of methods of grade distribution in group projects: simpler is better. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1416457
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. In (7th Ed. ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2013). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123
Harding, L. M. (2018). Students of a feather “flocked” together: A group assignment method for reducing free-riding and improving group and individual learning outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475317708588
Hidayat, R., Imami, W. K. M., Liu, S., Qudratuddarsi, H., & Saad, M. R. M. (2024). Validity of engagement instrument during online learning in Mathematics education. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(2), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.34453
Hing, L. S. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., Garcia, D. M., Gee, S. S., & Orazietti, K. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024618
Hughes, D. (2023). The case for team-based learning in higher education scriptwriting programmes: A narrative literature review. Journal of Screenwriting, 14(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00115_1
Jasso, G., Törnblom, K. Y., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Distributive justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 201-218). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11
Ji-Young, S. (2021). The effects of group work on interaction and learning outcomes in non face-to-face synchronous general english classes in the EFL setting. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(2), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.82.230.237
Julianti, R. T., Sahiner, M., & Khalid, N. (2025). Utilization of MOOC for Subak values extension: Maintaining Balinese local wisdom in modern education. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 3(1), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v3i1.1569
Kang, Y. H., & Kim, R. H. (2021). Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y
Katona, J., & Gyonyoru, K. I. K. (2025). Integrating AI-based adaptive learning into the flipped classroom model to enhance engagement and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100392
Kidwell Jr., E. R. (2003). Withholding effort in organizations: Toward development and validation of a measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(4), 537-561. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023456319134
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Levin, P. (2003). Running group projects: Dealing with the free-rider problem. Planet, 9(1), 7-8. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2003.00090007
Liebech-Lien, B., & Sjølie, E. (2021). Teachers’ conceptions and uses of student collaboration in the classroom. Educational Research, 63(2), 212-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1839354
Lin, T. C., & Huang, C. C. (2009). Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 6156-6163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.014
Liu, C. S.-N., & Beaujean, A. A. (2017). The effectiveness of team-based learning on academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000075
Maqbool, R., & Shaji, A. (2024). Quantifying the social loafing led productivity issues in architecture, engineering and construction project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2023-0741
Matsunaga, K., Barnes, M. M., & Saito, E. (2021). Exploring, negotiating and responding: international students’ experiences of group work at Australian universities. Higher Education, 81, 989-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00592-5
Mentz, E., & Zyl, V. S. (2018). The impact of cooperative learning on self-directed learning abilities in the computer applications technology class. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(4), 482-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1513426
Morgan-Knapp, C. (2022). Fairness, individuality, and free riding. The Philosophical Quarterly, 72(4), 940-959. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqab075
Mustafa, F., Weda, S., & Masykar, T. (2022). Correlation between student internet access and teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching online classes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(10), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i10.25819
Nepal, K. P. (2012). An approach to assign individual marks from a team mark: the case of Australian grading system at universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.555815
Nwoji, Q., Gada, B. A., & Alqahtani, Z. M. (2025). New media, learning outcomes, and social development of children: a case study of digital technology use in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 3(1), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v3i1.1854
Nwune, E. C., Oguezue, N. K., & Odum, B. I. (2023). Secondary school students’ perception of science laboratory accident status and preventive measures in Awka education zone. Integrated Science Education Journal, 4(3), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i3.550
Privitera, G. J. (2018). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd Ed ed.). Sage Production.
Samarakoon, U., & Imbulpitiya, A. (2020). Work-in-progress: Reducing social loafing in information technology undergraduate group projects Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_11
Samarakoon, U., Manathunga, K., & Imbulpitiya, A. (2022). Enhancing the quality and student attitude on capstone projects through activity-based learning and reduced social loafing. In B. Csapó & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Computer Supported Education (pp. 336-358). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14756-2_17
Sarnoko, S., Asrowi, A., Gunarhadi, G., & Usodo, B. (2024). An analysis of the application of problem based learning (PBL) model in Mathematics for elementary school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32057
Sayegh, J., & Rigopoulos, A. (2023). Improving student learning outcomes through formally structured group projects. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 47(5), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2043203
Šerić, M., & Praničević, D. G. (2018). Managing group work in the classroom: An international study on perceived benefits and risks based on students’ cultural background and gender. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 23(1), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi/2018.23.1.139
Sherif, D. M. (2022). How Students’ Big Five personality traits manifest in perceived social loafing behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 1034-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12486
Sigar, P. A., Nguyen-Quang, D., & Hendry, R. (2025). Can private schools overcome promotional limitations through a 4P-based digital marketing strategy? a case study in Malaysia. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 3(1), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v3i1.1843
Spatar, C., Penna, N., Mills, H., Kutija, V., & Cooke, M. (2015). A robust approach for mapping group marks to individual marks using peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.917270
Sridharan, B., Muttakin, M. B., & Mihret, D. G. (2018). Students’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: An explorative study. Accounting Education, 27(3), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1476894
Sun, L., Gao, X., & Li, Y. (2024). Why do people enjoy hitchhiking in teams? A moderated serial mediated study on social loafing. Asian Business & Management, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00267-4
Suwarsi, S., Ridwan, R., & Fauzan, N. (2024). Evaluating workload impacts on lecturer mental health and productivity in indonesian private universities: A case study from bandung. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(1), Article 2025045. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025045
Swanson, E., Mcculley, V. L., Osman, J. D., Lewis, S. N., & Solis, M. (2019). The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417731201
Taggart, J., & Wheeler, B. L. (2025). Collaborative learning as constructivist practice: An exploratory qualitative descriptive study of faculty approaches to student group work. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231193938
Tatterton, J. M., & Fisher, J. M. (2022). Team-based learning and nurse education: A systematic review. Evidence Based Nursing, 25(4), 117-118. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103595
Torka, A.-K., Mazei, J., & Hüffmeier, J. (2021). Together, everyone achieves more—or, less? An interdisciplinary meta-analysis on effort gains and losses in teams. Psychological Bulletin, 147(5), 504-534. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000251
Valentine, M. (2018). When equity seems unfair: The role of justice enforceability in temporary team coordination. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2081-2105. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1101
Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (2016). Procedural justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 219-236). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_12
Wang, Y. (2025). Overworked and under-creative: Teacher workload, time allocation, and creative pedagogy in Chinese secondary schools - evidence from PISA 2022. Teaching and Teacher Education, 160, Article 105039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105039
Wilson, K. J., Brickman, P., & Brame, C. J. (2018). Group work. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0258
Yadewani, D., Pandi, D. O., Syafrani, S., Nurofik, A., & Poddar, S. (2024). Impact of government policies on the knowledge base of sustainable small and medium-sized enterprises. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(1), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.31884
Zhoc, H. C. K., Chung, H. S. T., & King, B. R. (2018). Emotional intelligence (EI) and self‐directed learning: Examining their relation and contribution to better student learning outcomes in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 982-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3472
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Burhanuddin Yasin, Omar K Burhan, Faisal Mustafa, Ika Apriani Fata, Endang Komariah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
