LANGUAGE POLITENESS IN DIGITAL STREAMING: THE IMPLICATIONS TO EDUCATION AND ETHICS IN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE TECHNOLOGICAL ERA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.44388

Keywords:

Communication, Technology, Education, Language Politeness, Streaming

Abstract

This study investigates the phenomenon of politeness violations in digital live streaming interactions, focusing on gaming content on YouTube a platform increasingly characterized by the prevalence of “toxic” language, including harsh, derogatory, and provocative expressions. Such discourse poses a growing challenge to communication ethics and character education in the technological era. The research aims to analyze specific types of politeness principle violations and their implications for character formation and digital communication practices. Adopting a qualitative approach through observation, documentation, and interviews, the study found that violations most frequently targeted the principles of tact and generosity. Notably, these utterances were not merely spontaneous outbursts but deliberate strategies of performative impoliteness, designed to construct a particular self-image and amplified by platform algorithms seeking engagement. The novelty of this research lies in its integration of linguistic analysis, digital ethics, and character education within the context of real-time live streaming—a convergence rarely explored in prior studies. This interdisciplinary approach provides unique insights into how algorithm-driven platforms can normalize verbal aggression, influencing audience psychology and diminishing empathy values, particularly among student viewers. The findings highlight the urgent need to expand digital literacy education to encompass the ethical dimensions of communication, not just technical proficiency. The study recommends incorporating polite language awareness and ICT ethics into curricula to foster respectful, constructive interaction in online spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hastari Mayrita, Universitas Bina Darma

Universitas Bina Darma, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia

Shopia Rahmawati, Jambi University

Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

Hani Atus Sholikhah, Sriwijaya University

Sriwijaya University, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia

Wuttipong Wongprakob, Thammasat University

Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Marzul Hidayat, Universitas Jambi

Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

Fortunasari Fortunasari, Universitas Jambi

Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

Ella Masita, Universitas Jambi

Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

Lenny Marzulina, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah

Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia

References

Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2020). The nasty effect: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009.

Barkatullah, A. H., & Halim, A. (2017). Teknologi Digital dan Perkembangannya dalam Komunikasi Modern [Digital Teknologi Digital and Its Development in Modern Communication]. Jakarta: Pustaka Digital.

Bernard, H. R. (2022). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Borkan, J., Kelly, R., Walker, S., & Thomas, M. (2019). Toxic Language in Digital Communication: Impact and Mitigation Strategies. New York: Digital Communication Press.

Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. A. (Eds.). (2008). Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Mouton de Gruyter.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bryman, A. (2021). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Buder, J., Rabl, L., Feiks, M., Badermann, M., & Zurstiege, G. (2021). Does negatively toned language use on social media lead to attitude polarization?. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106663.

Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown and Company.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2021). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Erawati, A., Surif, M., & Dalimunthe, S. F. (2022). Analisis wacana kritis nourman fairclough terhadap jokowi yang menyentil menterinya mengenai kenaikan harga minyak goreng [Critical discourse analysis of norman fairclough on jokowi’s statement criticizing his ministers regarding the rise in cooking oil prices]. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 10653–10662. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i2.4114

Fauzan, R. (2021). Dinamika Bahasa dalam Interaksi Digital: Sebuah Tinjauan Linguistik [Language Dynamics in Digital Interaction: A Linguistic Review]. Jakarta: Pustaka Media.

Fitriani, R., Sari, N., & Wijayanti, A. (2023). Media Sosial dalam Era Digital: Dampak dan Tantangan dalam Pendidikan [Social Media in the Digital Era: Impacts and Challenges in Education]. Bandung: EduTech Press. Bandung: EduTech Press.

Fitriani, R., Sari, A., & Nugroho, P. (2023). Pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pembelajaran: Peluang dan tantangan [Utilization of technology in learning: Opportunities and challenges]. Jakarta: Pustaka Edukasi.

Flick, U. (2020). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Handayani, T. (2023). Dampak Psikologis Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial [The Psychological Impact of Hate Speech on Social Media]. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Herring, S. C. (2020). The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. Language@Internet, 17, 1–27.

Ikhsan, M., Atun, S., Agusta, F., Unayah, H., Buhera, R., Pamungkas, O., Sarip, M., & Sitorus, P. A. (2025). Development of critical thinking essay test instrument and prosocial intention questionnaire for environmental care in students. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 6(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i1.1273.

Jannah, R., Nugroho, A., & Susanti, E. (2018). Dampak Anonimitas dalam Komunikasi Online terhadap Kesantunan Berbahasa [Language in Digital Interaction: An Analysis of Harsh Expressions and Their Impact]. Yogyakarta: Lingua Media.

Jalmasco, A. C., Loberes, J. M., & Lasala, N. J. (2025). Interactive story for teaching ecosystem topics using twine application for elementary school students. Journal of Basic Education Research, 6(2), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v6i2.1480.

Julianti, R. T., Sahiner, M., & Khalid, N. (2025). Utilization of MOOC for subak values extension: Maintaining Balinese local wisdom in modern education. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 3(1), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v3i1.1569.

Jumaera, S., Blessing, O. T., & Rukondo, N. (2024). Optimizing student activities and learning outcomes through problem solving models in stoichiometry material. Journal of Chemical Learning Innovation, 1(2), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.37251/jocli.v1i2.1147.

King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2022). Interviews in qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kurniawan, A. (2022). Fenomena Bahasa Toxic di Media Sosial: Perspektif Linguistik dan Psikologi Komunikasi [The Phenomenon of Toxic Language on Social Media: A Linguistic and Communication Psychology Perspective]. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2015). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 591–600.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Melani, E. R., & Zamzamy, A. (2023). Symbolic interaction in tiktok's live streaming: A study of influencer-viewers engagement. Jurnal Spektrum Komunikasi, 11(4), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.37826/spektrum.v11i4.620.

Melinda, S., Feizi , F., & Monfared , P. N. (2024). Transforming religious learning with macromedia flash 8: Improving students’ understanding of the material on faith in the apostles. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 2(2), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v2i2.1100.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nurkamila, A., Rahmalia, N., & Rachman, I. F. (2024). Tantangan dan peluang pendidikan literasi digital dalam konteks SDGs 2030 [Challenges and opportunities for digital literacy education in the context of SDGs 2030]. Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 2(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1234/cjppm.v2i2.144.

Perdana, F. A., Zakariah, S. H., & Alasmari, T. (2023). Development of learning media in the form of electronic books with dynamic electricity teaching materials. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v1i1.619.

Prasetyo, D., & Lestari, M. (2021). Pengaruh bahasa toxic terhadap kualitas diskusi di media sosial [The impact of toxic language on the quality of discussions on social media]. Jurnal Komunikasi Digital, 5(2), 112-130.

Pratiwi, N. E. (2022). Analisis wacana kritis berita bencana banjir: Studi kasus media online sriwijaya post [Critical discourse analysis of flood disaster news: A case study of the online media sriwijaya post]. Undergraduate Thesis, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. Retrieved from http://repository.radenfatah.ac.id/id/eprint/23277

Sara, N. (2022). Analisis wacana kritis pemberitaan kasus kriminal pada media SimburSumatera.com di masa Covid-19 [Critical discourse analysis of crime news coverage on SimburSumatera.com during the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Undergraduate Thesis, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. Available from http://repository.radenfatah.ac.id/id/eprint/21543

Sari, D., & Nugroho, P. (2020). Anonimitas dan ujaran kebencian: Studi kasus di forum diskusi online [Anonymity and hate speech: A case study in online discussion forums]. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 8(3), 75-90.

Siddique, Z. F., Nahar, L., & Mahmood, F. (2025). Autoethnographic projection of climate change education through project-based learning: Perspectives from early career scholars. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1170.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D [Qualitative, Quantitative, and Research and Development (R&D) Methods]. Alfabeta.

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

Rahmawati, I. (2022). Norms and Communication Patterns in Online Communities: A Case Study on the Use of Toxic Language. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga Press.

Widodo, H. (2021). Social Media Algorithms and the Spread of Provocative Content. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2018). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748.

Yin, R. K. (2020). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zubair, S., Alyousfi, E. A., & Khan, S. A. (2025). New media and children’s social development: a case study of digital technology use among 8–12-year-Olds in Pakistan. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 3(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.37251/jetlc.v3i1.1730.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-10

How to Cite

Mayrita, H., Rahmawati, S., Sholikhah, H. A., Wongprakob, W., Hidayat, M., Fortunasari, F., … Marzulina, L. (2025). LANGUAGE POLITENESS IN DIGITAL STREAMING: THE IMPLICATIONS TO EDUCATION AND ETHICS IN COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE TECHNOLOGICAL ERA. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(3), 1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.44388