ADOPTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN STEM LEARNING: EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF PERFORMANCE, EFFORT, AND SOCIAL FACTORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i4.44475Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Behavioral Intention, Effort Expectancy, Performance Expectancy, Social Influence, STEMAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently gained prominence in higher education, particularly in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines, offering transformative potential for learning and innovation. However, students’ adoption of AI tools is influenced by multiple psychological and contextual factors. This study aims to examine the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence on students’ behavioral intentions to integrate AI into STEM education. A quantitative research design was employed, involving 203 undergraduate students from the University of Jambi and Universitas PGRI Mahadewa Indonesia. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through SmartPLS 3.3 to identify direct and mediating relationships among variables. The findings revealed that performance expectancy significantly influenced students’ behavioral intentions, indicating that perceived usefulness of AI outweighs ease of use in determining adoption. Effort expectancy also had a substantial effect and mediated the relationship between performance expectancy and behavioral intentions, while social influence showed no significant impact. These results highlight that students’ engagement with AI in STEM learning is driven more by perceived academic and functional benefits than by peer or social reinforcement. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework with the STEM education context in developing countries, providing new empirical insights into AI adoption behavior. The study recommends designing AI-supported learning environments that emphasize practical benefits, user-friendly interfaces, and pedagogical integration to enhance students’ learning outcomes and technological readiness.
Downloads
References
Adam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2021). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7.
Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021). Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1874(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085.
Agarwal, P., Swami, S., & Malhotra, S. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption in the post COVID-19 New-Normal and role of smart technologies in transforming business: a Review. In Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management (Vol. 15, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2021-0122.
Al Humaid Alneyadi, M. R. M., & Normalini, M. K. (2023). Factors influencing user’s intention to adopt AI-based cybersecurity systems in the UAE. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 18. https://doi.org/10.28945/5166.
Ali, A. A., Abbass, A., & Farid, N. (2020). Factors influencing customers’ purchase intention in social commerce. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.10097.
Alshammari, S. H., & Alshammari, M. H. (2024). Factors affecting the adoption and use of ChatGPT in higher education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.339557.
Aluri, A., & Tucker, E. (2015). Social influence and technology acceptance: The use of personal social media as a career enhancement tool among college students. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2015.1033103.
An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z.
Andrews, J. E., Ward, H., & Yoon, J. W. (2021). UTAUT as a model for understanding intention to adopt AI and related technologies among librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102437.
Barbul, M., & Bojescu, I. (2023). Generations’ Perception Towards the Interaction with AI. https://doi.org/10.24818/basiq/2023/09/041.
Bardakcı, S., & Alkan, M. F. (2019). Investigation of Turkish preservice teachers’ intentions to use IWB in terms of technological and pedagogical aspects. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09904-4.
Bhowmik, S., Barrett, A., Ke, F., Yuan, X., Southerland, S., Dai, C. P., West, L., & Dai, Z. (2022). Simulating students: An AI chatbot for teacher training. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS .
Bouteraa, M., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Al-Daihani, M., Dirie, K. A., Benlahcene, A., Sadallah, M., Zaki, H. O., Lada, S., Ansar, R., Fook, L. M., & Chekima, B. (2024). Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students’ integrity matter? Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100402.
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0039.
Bowman, B., & Howie Huang, H. (2021). Towards Next-Generation cybersecurity with Graph AI. Operating Systems Review (ACM), 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3469379.3469386.
Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and Behavioral Intentions towards Learning Artificial Intelligence in Primary School Students. Educational Technology and Society, 24(3).
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Khorana, S., Mikalef, P., & Sharma, A. (2023). Assessing organizational users’ intentions and behavior to AI integrated CRM systems: a Meta-UTAUT approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10181-1.
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118.
Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426.
Cubric, M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257.
Cui, D., & Wu, F. (2021). The influence of media use on public perceptions of artificial intelligence in China: Evidence from an online survey. Information Development, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919893411.
Dash, B., Sharma, P., & Swayamsiddha, S. (2023). Organizational digital transformations and the importance of assessing theoretical frameworks such as TAM, TTF, and UTAUT: A review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140201.
Du, Y., Li, T., & Gao, C. (2023). Why do designers in various fields have different attitude and behavioral intention towards AI painting tools? an extended UTAUT model. Procedia Computer Science, 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.08.010.
Dung Le, (Jenny), Chung, K., Quach, S., & Thaichon, P. (2022). A framework of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in marketing. In Artificial Intelligence for Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280392-5.
Duong, C. D., Bui, D. T., Pham, H. T., Vu, A. T., & Nguyen, V. H. (2024). How effort expectancy and performance expectancy interact to trigger higher education students’ uses of ChatGPT for learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0096.
Esiyok, E., Gokcearslan, S., & Kucukergin, K. G. (2025). Acceptance of educational use of AI chatbots in the context of self-directed learning with technology and ICT self-efficacy of undergraduate students. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2303557.
Faqih, K. M. S., & Jaradat, M. I. R. M. (2021). Integrating TTF and UTAUT2 theories to investigate the adoption of augmented reality technology in education: Perspective from a developing country. Technology in Society, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101787.
Fetaji, M. (2023). Dеvising a modеl AI-UTAUT by combining artificial inteligence AI with unifiеd thеory of accеptancе and usе of tеchnology (UTAUT). SAR Journal - Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.18421/sar63-06.
Filieri, R., D’Amico, E., Destefanis, A., Paolucci, E., & Raguseo, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) for tourism: an European-based study on successful AI tourism start-ups. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2021-0220.
Fu, H. P., Chang, T. H., Lin, S. W., Teng, Y. H., & Huang, Y. Z. (2023). Evaluation and adoption of artificial intelligence in the retail industry. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2021-0610.
García de Blanes Sebastián, M., Sarmiento Guede, J. R., & Antonovica, A. (2022). Application and extension of the UTAUT2 model for determining behavioral intention factors in use of the artificial intelligence virtual assistants. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993935.
Giabbanelli, P. J., & Tawfik, A. A. (2020). Reducing the gap between the conceptual models of students and experts using graph-based adaptive instructional systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12425 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_40.
Ebirim, G. E., Unigwe, I. F., Oshioste, E. E., Ndubuisi, N. L. Odonkor, B., & Asuzu, O. F. (2024). Innovations in accounting and auditing: A comprehensive review of current trends and their impact on U.S. businesses. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0134.
Gokcearslan, S. (2020). Perspectives of students on acceptance of tablets and Self-directed learning with technology. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6186.
Habibi, A., Muhaimin, M., Danibao, B. K., Wibowo, Y. G., Wahyuni, S., & Octavia, A. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education learning: Acceptance and use. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190.
Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.
He, T., Huang, Q., Yu, X., & Li, S. (2021). Exploring students’ digital informal learning: the roles of digital competence and DTPB factors. Behaviour and Information Technology, 40(13). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1752800.
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2022). A framework for collaborative artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of Retailing, 98(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.001.
Jain, R., Garg, N., & Khera, S. N. (2022). Adoption of AI-Enabled tools in social development organizations in India: An extension of UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893691.
Jang, J., Jeon, J., & Jung, S. K. (2022). Development of STEM-Based AI education program for sustainable improvement of elementary learners. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215178.
Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Krzypkowska, P., & Kurasinski, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence prompt engineering as a new digital competence: Analysis of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110302.
Krempkow, R., & Petri, P. S. (2022). Digital Competences of Students. In Transformation Fast and Slow. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004520912_003.
Li, X., Xiang, H., Zhou, X., & Jing, H. (2023). An empirical study on designing STEM + AI teaching to cultivate primary school students ’ computational thinking perspective. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3606094.3606130.
Liang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: an integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. In Interactive Learning Environments (Vol. 31, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348.
Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438.
Luo, L., Stoeger, H., & Subotnik, R. F. (2022). The influences of social agents in completing a STEM degree: an examination of female graduates of selective science high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00324-w.
Menon, D., & Shilpa, K. (2023). “Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the factors influencing users’ intention to Use the Open AI’s ChatGPT using the UTAUT model. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20962.
Nam, B. H., & Bai, Q. (2023). ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education: a media discourse analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00452-5.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6.
Nixon, N., Lin, Y., & Snow, L. (2024). Catalyzing equity in STEM teams: Harnessing generative AI for inclusion and diversity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231220356.
Nuangchalerm, P. (2023). AI-Driven learning analytics in STEM education. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v5i2.1596.
Parsakia, K. (2023). The effect of Chatbots and AI on the Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem, Problem-Solving and critical thinking of students. Health Nexus, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.61838/hn.1.1.14.
Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025.
Rahman, M., Ming, T. H., Baigh, T. A., & Sarker, M. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in banking services: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2020-0724.
Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020). Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to-business firms: Past, present, and future. In Industrial Marketing Management (Vol. 86). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.019.
Salah, O. H., & Ayyash, M. M. (2024). E-commerce adoption by SMEs and its effect on marketing performance: An extended of TOE framework with ai integration, innovation culture, and customer tech-savviness. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100183.
Samala, N., Katkam, B. S., Bellamkonda, R. S., & Rodriguez, R. V. (2022). Impact of AI and robotics in the tourism sector: a critical insight. Journal of Tourism Futures, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-07-2019-0065.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Market Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2.
Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., & Naccache, H. (2024). Leadership styles and AI acceptance in academic libraries in higher education. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102849.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.
Sidlauskiene, J., Joye, Y., & Auruskeviciene, V. (2023). AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions. Electronic Markets, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00633-8.
Soriano, G. (2021). Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Faculty Evaluation for Online Teaching (FEOT). Bedan Research Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v6i1.28.
Stoilova, E. (2021). AI chatbots as a customer service and support tool. ROBONOMICS: The Journal of the Automated Economy, 2.
Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI Chatbots in Chinese higher education: adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—an integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549.
Vasconcelos, M. A. R., & dos Santos, R. P. (2023). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313.
Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Wald, R., Piotrowski, J. T., Araujo, T., & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2023). Virtual assistants in the family home. Understanding parents’ motivations to use virtual assistants with their Child(dren). Computers in Human Behavior, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107526.
Xu, X., & Thien, L. M. (2025). Unleashing the power of perceived enjoyment: exploring Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ intention to use ChatGPT for English learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0555.
Yusop, F. D., Habibi, A., & Razak, R. A. (2021). Factors Affecting Indonesian Preservice Teachers’ Use of ICT During Teaching Practices Through Theory of Planned Behavior. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211027572.
Zafari, M., Bazargani, J. S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. In IEEE Access (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179356.
Zeroual, L., & Zerouali Ouariti, O. (2022). Factors Influencing User’s Satisfaction with Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010743500003101.
Zhou, Y., Chai, C. S., Liang, J. C., Jin, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). The relationship between teachers’ online homework guidance and technological pedagogical content knowledge about educational use of web. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0344-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Wayan Sumandya, I Wayan Widana, Robi Hendra, Supian Supian, Muhammad Yusuf, Hansein Arif Wijaya, Rahma Ayu Safitri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
