DEVELOPMENT AND ISO 25010 EVALUATION OF A WEB-BASED LABORATORY AND WORKSHOP INVENTORY SYSTEM

Bekti Wulandari; Dzul Fadli Rahman; Doni Fitriyanto; Satriyo Agung Dewanto; Muhammad Munir

doi:10.22437/jiituj.v10i1.47430

Authors

Bekti Wulandari Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-6917
Dzul Fadli Rahman Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9082-7488
Doni Fitriyanto Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-7211
Satriyo Agung Dewanto Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5149-6207
Muhammad Munir Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v10i1.47430

Keywords:

Inventory Information System, ISO 25010, Laboratory and Workshop, Waterfall Model, Web-based

Abstract

Effective management of laboratory tools and materials is essential to support experimentation and practical learning in higher education. However, many institutions still rely on manual inventory processes, which lead to data inaccuracies, inefficiencies, and limited monitoring capabilities. This study aims to develop and evaluate a web-based laboratory and workshop inventory management system tailored to the Department of Electronics and Informatics Education Engineering (DPTEI). The research adopts a Research and Development (R&D) design using the Waterfall Model, encompassing communication, planning, modeling, construction, and deployment phases. Data were collected from 22 participants (laboratory officers, workshop technicians, and lecturers) selected through purposive sampling. Requirement analysis was conducted via observations, structured interviews, and document review, while system evaluation employed questionnaires and automated testing tools. System quality was assessed using ISO 25010 criteria—functional suitability, reliability, performance efficiency, and usability—and a paired t-test was used to compare inventory management efficiency before and after implementation. The system achieved 100% functional suitability, very high reliability (up to 99.84% in stress testing), and strong performance efficiency with an average Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) of 1.180 seconds. The System Usability Scale (SUS) yielded a score of 84, classified as excellent, and the paired t-test (p = 0.002) indicated a significant improvement in inventory efficiency. These findings demonstrate that the developed system is robust, reliable, and well-accepted by users, contributing a domain-specific, empirically validated solution for digital resource management in academic laboratory settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bekti Wulandari, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Department of Electronics and Informatics Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dzul Fadli Rahman, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Department of Electronics and Informatics Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Doni Fitriyanto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Department of Electronics and Informatics Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Satriyo Agung Dewanto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Department of Electronics and Informatics Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

References

Accad, M. J. R., Bantayan, R. M., Calma Jr, A. A., Maquiñana, K. E., Tanael, D. V., & Maupay, A. C. M. (2023). Integrated inventory management and asset tracking system with user-centric computer kiosk interface. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(3), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2471.

Adekunle, A. A., Abolore, B. L., Mutiu, G., & Olalekan, A. M. (2024). Design and implementation of a web-based laboratory management system for efficient resource tracking. Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences, 13(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.70112/ajes-2024.13.2.4248.

Almassalkhi, M., Frolik, J., & Hines, P. (2022). Packetizing the power grid: The rules of the internet can also balance electricity supply and demand. IEEE Spectrum, 59(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2022.9706403.

Anggara, B., Anshor, A. H., & Hadikristanto, W. (2024). Implementation Web-Based QR-Code information system design in warehouse inventory management system using rapid application development (RAD). Formosa Journal of Computer and Information Science, 3(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjcis.v3i2.10117.

Asthana, A., & Olivieri, J. (2009). Quantifying software reliability and readiness. 2009 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CQR.2009.5137352.

Benavides, L., Tamayo Arias, J., Arango Serna, M., Branch Bedoya, J., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291.

Bock, P. (2020). Getting it right : R&D methods for science and engineering (2nd edition). Academic Press.

Chen, L., & Yang, J. (2016). Research on the current situation and countermeasures of the college laboratory safety management. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Advances in Management, Arts and Humanities Science. https://doi.org/10.2991/amahs-16.2016.6.

Chrysohoou, C., Marketou, M., Aktsiali, M., & Griveas, I. (2025). A Delphi consensus project to capture experts’ opinion on hyperkalaemia management across the cardiorenal spectrum. ESC Heart Failure, 12(2), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15153.

Chyung, S. Y. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-Based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the likert scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727.

Comeaga, M. L. (2022). Digital transformation of the laboratories. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1268(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1268/1/012001.

Dąbrowska, J., Almpanopoulou, A., Brem, A., Chesbrough, H., Cucino, V., Di Minin, A., Giones, F., Hakala, H., Marullo, C., Mention, A., Mortara, L., Nørskov, S., Nylund, P. A., Oddo, C. M., Radziwon, A., & Ritala, P. (2022). Digital transformation, for better or worse: A critical multi‐level research agenda. R&D Management, 52(5), 930–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12531.

Dewanto, S. A., Munir, M., & Wulandari, B. (2021). Sistem K3 pada pembelajaran Praktik di Prodi Pendidikan Teknik Elektronika Fakultas Teknik UNY [K3 System in Practical Learning in the Electronic Engineering Education Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, UNY]. Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), 5(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v5i2.36109.

Gronier, G., & Baudet, A. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the F-SUS: Creation and validation of the french version of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898828.

Gurung, G., Shah, R., & Jaiswal, D. P. (2020). Software development life cycle models-a comparative study. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT206410.

Hadikin, V. B., & Wiratama, J. (2024). Web-Based ERP system prototype for enhanced inventory and supply chain management in the logistics industry. Ultima InfoSys : Jurnal Ilmu Sistem Informasi, 15(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v15i2.3839.

Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Technologies for the future of learning: State of the art. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(2), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00640-0.

Itakussu, E. Y., Morita, A. A., Kakitsuka, E. E., Pitta, F., Cavalheri, V., & Hernandes, N. A. (2021). Instruments to assess function or functionality in adults after a burn injury: A systematic review. Burns, 47(5), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.003.

Kadi, I., Idri, A., & Ouhbi, S. (2016). Quality evaluation of cardiac decision support systems using ISO 25010 standard. IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA). https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2016.7945657.

Kammerlohr, V., Paradice, D., & Uckelmann, D. (2023). A maturity model for the effective digital transformation of laboratories. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2022-0050.

Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2020). How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1750075.

Kortum, P., Acemyan, C. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2021). Is it time to go positive? assessing the positively worded system usability scale (SUS). Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 63(6), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819881556.

Kranjc, T. (2021). Introduction to laboratory software solutions and differences between them. In Digital Transformation of the Laboratory (pp. 75–84). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527825042.ch3.

Kumar, B., Anjali, Y., Mudholkar, M., Mudholkar, P., Bharati, P. V., & Abdullayeva, N. (2024). IoT-Enabled asset management and tracking in organizations. 2024 Second International Conference Computational and Characterization Techniques in Engineering & Sciences (IC3TES), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3TES62412.2024.10877428.

Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: Mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14), 11221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221.

Mejri, I., Layeb, S. B., Aissaoui, N., & Kaabar, M. Y. (2024). Inventory Management Performance of Medical Analysis Laboratory in a Public Hospital (pp. 267–283). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70292-1_13.

Meneses, B., & Varajão, J. (2022). A framework of information systems development concepts. Business Systems Research Journal, 13(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0006.

Mishra, A., Dubey, D., & Choudhary, R. K. (2023). Structured software development versus agile software development: A comparative study. Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5.

Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Duncan Matthews, R. (2022). A sustainable university: Digital transformation and beyond. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8961–8996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10968-y.

Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1.

Mulyawan, M. D., Kumara, I. N. S., Swamardika, I. B. A., & Saputra, K. O. (2021). Kualitas sistem informasi berdasarkan ISO/IEC 25010: Literature review [Information system quality based on ISO/IEC 25010: Literature review]. Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro, 20(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24843/mite.2021.v20i01.p02.

Munir, M., Dewanto, S. A., & Wulandari, B. (2018). The implementation of occupational safety and health (osh) in practical courses of the electronics engineering education study program, faculty of engineering, Yogyakarta State University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1140, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1140/1/012015.

Namoun, A., Alrehaili, A., & Tufail, A. (2021). A Review of Automated Website Usability Evaluation Tools: Research Issues and Challenges (pp. 292–311). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_20.

Nikolic, S., Ritz, C., Vial, P. J., Ros, M., & Stirling, D. (2015). Decoding student satisfaction: How to manage and improve the laboratory experience. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(3), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2346474.

Oyekan, E. A., & Ikuomola, A. J. (2024). An improved web-based inventory management system for universities. Proceedings of the 3rd International Multi-Disciplinary Conference: Integrated Sciences and Technologies (IMDC-IST 2023). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-10-2023.2348749.

Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2020). A laboratory as the infrastructure of engagement: Epistemological reflections. Open Library of Humanities, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.569.

Pratama, A. A., & Mutiara, A. B. (2021). Software quality analysis for Halodoc application using ISO 25010:2011. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120844.

Putri, S. N. (2023). Manajemen sarana dan prasarana pendidikan untuk meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran di sekolah [Management of educational facilities and infrastructure to improve the quality of learning in schools]. Thawalib: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 4(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.54150/thawalib.v4i2.233.

Rahmawati, B. D., Prasetyo, Y. A., & others. (2024). System usability scale (SUS) as an analysis method for official website evaluation. Telematika, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.31315/telematika.v21i2.12918.

Ratnaduhita, N., Sudianto, Y., & Kusumawati, A. (2023). ISO/IEC 25010: Analisis kualitas sistem e-learning sebagai media pembelajaran online [ISO/IEC 25010: Quality analysis of e-learning systems as online learning media]. Journal of Information System, Graphics, Hospitality and Technology, 5(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.37823/insight.v5i1.302.

Saravanos, A., & Askounis, D. (2023). Simulating the software development lifecycle: The waterfall model. Computation, 6(6), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation6060108.

Senagi, K., & Tonnang, H. E. Z. (2022). A novel tightly coupled information system for research data management. Electronics, 11(19), 3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193196.

Shehun, Md. T. F. (2025). The impact of data-driven industrial engineering models on efficiency and risk reduction in U.S. Apparel supply chains. International Journal of Business and Economics Insights, 05(03), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.63125/y548hz02.

Soegoto, E. S., & Palalungan, A. F. (2020). Web based online inventory information system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 879, 012125. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012125.

Souza-Pereira, L., Ouhbi, S., & Pombo, N. (2021). Quality-in-use characteristics for clinical decision support system assessment. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 207, 106169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106169.

Timoteo, M. O., Brochado, A. C. B., Costa-Silva, D., Granjeiro, J. M., Olej, B., & Alves, G. G. (2020). The impact of online management systems: a qualitative assessment of staff perception at a clinical research laboratory. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), e9239109188. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9188.

Tziakou, E., Fragkaki, A. G., & Platis, A. Ν. (2023). Identifying risk management challenges in laboratories. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 28(4), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-023-01540-3.

Wang, F. (2022). Research on intelligent management of laboratory information technology. Procedia Computer Science, 208, 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.027.

Yang, B. (2021). Research on the laboratory management mode based on the optimal allocation of resources. OALib, 08(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107119.

Zhang, J., & Li, H. (2021). Research on the problems and countermeasures of laboratory management in Colleges and Universities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1798(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1798/1/012006.