An Analysis of Lexical and Syntactical Errors in English Abstract Made by Students of the Accounting Department Polmed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v4i2.42105Keywords:
Lexical, syntactical, error, semantics, taxonomyAbstract
The main purpose of the study is to find out the kinds of lexical and syntactical errors in writing the student’s paper of English Abstract. The data collecting technique used the field research method from 25 student’s papers of English abstract of Accounting Department Politeknik Negeri Medan. The method used in the research is a qualitative approach. The findings of the research revealed that there were so many errors found in the student’s papers of English abstract. There were two kinds of lexical errors relate to Semantic Error in Lexis found in the student’s papers of English abstract which are Confusion of Sense Relations and Collocational Errors. The number of errors in Confusion of Sense was 20 errors with percentage 62.50 % while the collocational errors were also found as many as 12 errors that constituted 37,50% of the total errors collected in the data analysis process. The errors in the syntactical level are also found in the student’s paper of English abstract based on surface structure taxonomy. There were five kinds of errors found in the analysis process. The most frequent errors made by students are misformation 62 (40,79%) of error followed by omission error reach 54 (35,53%) of errors. The addition errors reach 22 (14,47%) of error. then, misordering errors are found 13 (8,55%) of errors. finally, the blend is only found 1 (0,66%) of errors in student’s papers of English abstract in Accounting Department Politeknik Negeri Medan.
Downloads
References
Alamin, A., & Ahmed, S. (2012). Syntactical and punctuation errors: An analysis of technical writing of University Students science college, Taif University, KSA. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n5p2
Azevedo, M. M., & Corder, S. P. (1983). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. The Modern Language Journal, 67(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.2307/326720
Brown, H. D. (2006). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (fifth edit; D. Belfiore, ed.). Retrieved from http://angol.uni-miskolc.hu/wp- content/media/2016/10/Principles_of_language_learning.pdf
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800002822
Dulay, Burt, & K. (1982). Language Two. New York, Oxport University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flick, uwe. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (Fourth edi). London: SAGE Publication, Ltd.
Gayo, H., & Widodo, P. (2018). An analysis of morphological and syntactical errors on the English writing of junior high school Indonesian students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(4), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.4.4
Gedion, A., & Peter, J. C. (2016). A Syntactic Errors Analysis in the Malaysian ESL Learners ’ Written Composition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 96–104.
Hafiz, M. S. (2018). Analysis of Syntactic Errors in English Writing : A Case Study of Jazan University Preparatory Year Students. 9(11), 113–120.
Hemchua, S., & Schmitt, N. (2006). An Analysis of Lexical Errors in the English Compositions of Thai Learners.
James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use. University of California: Longman.
James, C. (2013). Errors in Language Learning and Use (P. C. N. CANDLIN, ed.). Retrieved from file:///F:/New folder (2)/(Applied Linguistics and Language Study) Carl James - Errors in Language Learning and Use_ Exploring Error Analysis-Routledge (2013).pdf
Llach. (2011). Lexical Errors and Accuracy in Foreign Language Writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Miles and Hubermen. (1994). Qualitative data analyis (Second Edi). California: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Richard, jack R. (2010). LANGUAGE TEACHING AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS
(fourth edi). Great Britain.
Roscoe, J. . (1975). Fundamentals Research Statistics for Behavioural Sciences. (2nd.). in Hill, R. (1998). “What SampleSize is ‘Enough’ in Internet Survey Research”? Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An electronic Journal for the 21st Century. Available at: http://www.emoderators.com/ipct-j/1998/n3-4/hill.hmtl.
Sanders, R. (1987). Error Analysis In Purely Syntactic Parsing Of Free Input The Example Of German. CALICO Journal, Volume 9(Number 1), 75.
Saud, W. I. (2018). Lexical Errors of Third Year Undergraduate Students. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 161. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p161
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nuraini, Ridwan Hanafiah, Masdiana Lubis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









