Konstruksi teoretik modul konseling interkultural dalam penanganan bullying di sekolah dasar multikultural
Keywords:
Intercultural counseling, Bullying, Elementary school, Multicultural, Grounded TheoryAbstract
Bullying in multicultural elementary schools in Jambi Province has shown an alarming increase, posing serious threats to children’s psychosocial development. This study aims to (1) explore the experiences of teachers, counselors, and students in addressing bullying at the elementary school level; (2) identify intercultural values relevant to counseling practices; and (3) construct a conceptual framework for an intercultural counseling module rooted in Jambi’s local wisdom. A qualitative approach with grounded theory was employed, involving the stages of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observations, and focus group discussions and validated through source triangulation, expert review, and limited dissemination. The findings indicate that bullying is influenced by three main factors: (1) individual factors, such as low self-control and lack of empathy; (2) socio-cultural factors, including the dominance of seniority norms, cultural acceptance of violence, and peer pressure; and (3) school environment factors, including limited teacher supervision and the absence of systematic anti-bullying policies. The grounded theory produced a conceptual construction of an intercultural counseling module that integrates cross-cultural empathy, local wisdom, and both preventive and curative counseling strategies tailored to multicultural. The novelty of this study lies in the development of an intercultural counseling module based on Jambi’s local culture, designed to be both theoretical and practical. The implications provide conceptual and practical contributions to the field of guidance and counseling, particularly intercultural counseling, and offer a culturally grounded intervention instrument to enhance the effectiveness of bullying prevention in multicultural elementary schools.
Downloads
References
Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272–281.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–333.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jambi. (2023). Data kasus bullying di SD di Provinsi Jambi [Sumber data internal].
Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln's parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116
Ferdiansyah, Muhammad. (2015). Dasar penelitian kualitatif. Bogor : Herya Media.
Khan, S. N., et al. (2014). Qualitative research method: Grounded theory. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p224
Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2020). Sejumlah kasus bullying sudah warnai catatan masalah anak di awal, begini kata komisioner KPAI. https://www.kpai.go.id
Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2023, Februari 12). Kasus bullying di sekolah meningkat [Press release]. http://repository.unika.ac.id/13294/5/12.60.0248%20Christina%20Thiveny%20Putri
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Santiago-Delefosse, M., Gavin, A., Bruchez, C., Roux, P., & Stephen, S. L. (2016). Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Social Science & Medicine, 148, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.007
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Sage.
Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. (2019). An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education, 13(1), 81-100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Ferdiansyah, Muhammad Alridho Lubis, Zubaidah Zubaidah, Muhammad Zulfikar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published with license by LPPM Universitas Jambi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0 International). This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.







