Analisis bibliometrik atas fenomena disenfranchisement dalam pemilihan umum

Abstract

This study aims to explore the global development of research on the theme of disenfranchisement in elections, focusing on the Scopus database from 2020 to 2025. Disenfranchisement, defined as the loss or limitation of voting rights, is a critical issue in democratic studies, affecting the legitimacy and inclusivity of electoral systems. The research employs a scoping review methodology combined with bibliometric analysis using R and Biblioshiny, guided by PRISMA protocols. A total of 60 articles were selected based on specific inclusion criteria, including publication year, subject area, language, and document type. The bibliometric analysis is structured into three main components: author analysis, document analysis, and conceptual structure mapping. Results show that the United States dominates scientific production on this topic, while countries from the Global South, such as Nigeria, are emerging contributors. Key findings include the identification of influential authors, thematic trends over time, and keyword co-occurrence networks. The study reveals a multidimensional research landscape, where disenfranchisement is examined not only through political lenses but also legal, sociological, and behavioral perspectives. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive bibliometric mapping of disenfranchisement studies at a global scale, which has been underexplored in previous literature. The implications are significant for future research and policy development, as the findings highlight gaps in representation and collaboration across regions. This study contributes to the advancement of social science by offering strategic insights into the dynamics of electoral exclusion and promoting inclusive democratic practices through evidence-based scholarship.