Metode pengajaran berbasis kecocokan gaya mengajar dengan gaya belajar pada MDKU Bahasa Inggris
Keywords:
Learning styles, MKDU, Teaching methods, Teaching styles, University of JambiAbstract
This study aims to analyze the compatibility of students' learning styles with lecturers' teaching styles in MKDU English courses in several study programs at the University of Jambi. This research is a descriptive qualitative research that aims to gain an in-depth understanding of lecturers' teaching styles, student learning styles. The findings of this study explain that the effectiveness of the learning process is greatly influenced by the suitability between the lecturer's teaching style and the student's learning style. First, Cluster 1 (Expert–Formal Authority ↔ Dependent, Participant, Competitive) shows that methods such as structured lectures, drill & practice, and debates or academic competitions are the most effective for students with dependent and competitive tendencies. Second, Cluster 2 (Personal Model–Expert ↔ Collaborative, Dependent, Participant) emphasizes the importance of using demonstration methods, cooperative learning, and role modeling, which facilitate students in learning through imitation and collaboration. Third, Cluster 3 (Facilitator–Personal Model ↔ Collaborative, Participant, Independent) highlights the importance of implementing learning methods that foster student independence, such as Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Project-Based Learning (PjBL), and small group discussions. Fourth, Cluster 4 (Delegator–Facilitator–Expert ↔ Independent, Collaborative, Participant) shows that methods such as inquiry-based learning, independent projects, and peer teaching are more suitable for students who have independent and collaborative tendencies.
Downloads
References
Açıkgöz KÜ. Inquiry-based learning and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research. 2003;96(1):35–45.
Astuti W, Handayani S. Hubungan gaya belajar mandiri dengan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi dan Pendidikan. 2020;17(2):89–98.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Conti GJ. Identifying your teaching style. Journal of Extension. 2004;42(6):1–10.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
Gencel IE. The relationship between learning styles and teaching styles of prospective teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2007;7(4):1229–1258.
Gholami M, Bagheri M. Relationship between teaching styles and learning approaches in students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;84:932–937.
Goh SC, Fraser BJ. Classroom learning environments and student outcomes in higher education. Learning Environments Research. 2019;22(3):383–402.
Grasha AF. Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Pittsburgh: Alliance Publishers; 1996.
Hidayat R, Maulida S. Pendekatan personal dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar mahasiswa bergaya avoidant. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan. 2021;9(1):56–64.
Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review. 2004;16(3):235–266.
Hmelo-Silver CE, Duncan RG, Chinn CA. Scaffolding and achievement in problem based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist. 2007;42(2):99–107.
Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education; 1980.
Komarraju M, Karau SJ. The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2008;45(6):532–537.
Murray HG, Renaud RD. A teaching style measure and its relationship to student learning.
Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 1995;25(3):33–52.
Nugroho F, Fitriana R. Pengaruh pembelajaran terarah terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa bergaya belajar dependen. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora. 2022;10(2):115– 124.
Piaget J. The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Viking Press; 1970.
Rachmawati D, Prasetyo A. Pengaruh gaya mengajar personal model terhadapnmotivasi belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Inovatif. 2020;5(2):98–107.
Rahmawati N. Pengaruh kompetisi akademik terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan. 2020;11(1):23–31.
Rochmawati S, Sugiyanto S. Pengaruh gaya mengajar fasilitatif terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kolaboratif mahasiswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan. 2020;6(3):210–222.
Rogers CR, Freiberg HJ. Freedom to Learn. 3rd ed. New York: Merrill; 1994.
Sari DA, Sunardi S. Gaya belajar kolaboratif dan pengaruhnya terhadap motivasi dan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2021;9(1):33–45.
Siregar R, Zainuddin M. Efektivitas gaya mengajar expert dan formal authority terhadap pemahaman konseptual mahasiswa. Jurnal Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. 2018;24(1):77–89.
Sujanarko B. Pengaruh gaya mengajar fasilitatif terhadap motivasi dan partisipasi mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. 2018;25(2):145–154.
Thomas JW. A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation; 2000.
Trowler V. Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy. 2010;1–15.
Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
Widodo A. Hubungan gaya belajar participant dengan kepuasan belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi. 2019;7(4):201–210.
Yuliana M, Tanuwijaya H. Gaya mengajar fasilitator–delegator dan hubungannyadengan motivasi intrinsik mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. 2021;15(3):188–199.
Zepke N, Leach L. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2010;11(3):167–177.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RD. M. Ali, Yulhenli Thabran, Reny Heryanti, Dony Efriza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published with license by LPPM Universitas Jambi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0 International). This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.







