Menelaah Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum

Orin Gusta Andini; Yunus; Herdiansyah Hamzah

doi:10.22437/pampas.v6i3.48492

Authors

Orin Gusta Andini Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mulawarman
Yunus Pengadilan Negeri Maros, Indonesia
Herdiansyah Hamzah Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v6i3.48492

Keywords:

Child, Criminal Liabillity, Criminal Offense, Election, Anak, Pemilihan Umum, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Tindak Pidana

Abstract

Research related to criminal responsibility for children who commit election crimes is necessary as an effort to minimize the misuse of children in committing election offenses and to strengthen legal certainty in the context of election law enforcement involving children as perpetrators. This study aims to describe the regulation of election crimes committed by children and analyze the criminal liability of children who commit election crimes through the implementation of diversion. The research method used is a normative research through a legislative approach and a case approach. This study concludes that the election law does not provide for the implementation of diversion for children who commit electoral crimes, while the SPPA Law only regulates diversion in general, whereby diversion can be implemented based on the consent of the victim/their family. Even though the resolution refers to the SPPA Law, the implementation of diversion for election crimes faces difficulties in terms of obtaining the victim's consent to implement the requirements for diversion. This article recommends that if a child commits an election crime that This article recommends that if a child commits an election crime that meets the requirements for diversion, then diversion should be implemented with the involvement of Bawaslu as the victim's representative to give consentfor diversion because Bawaslu is the state representative that represents the interests of the victim, whether the community, candidate pairs, or the state. Additionally, this study also recommends that future Election Laws should expressly regulate the authority to declare an agreement on the implementation of diversion.

ABSTRAK

Penelitian terkait dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap anak yang melakukan tindak pidana pemilu diperlukan sebagai upaya untuk memperkecil celah penyalahgunaan anak untuk melakukan tindak pidana pemilu dan memperkuat kepastian hukum dalam rangka penegakan hukum pemilu mellaui diversi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaturan tindak pidana pemilu yang dilakukan oleh anak dan menganalisis peneran diversi terhadap anak yang melakukan tindak pidana pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa undang-undang pemilihan belum memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap pelaksanaan diversi, sedangkan UU SPPA hanya mengatur diversi secara umum dengan syarat dilakukan berdasarkan persetujuan korban atau keluarganya. Sekalipun penyelesaiannya merujuk pada UU SPPA, pelaksanaan diversi pada tindak pidana pemilu mengalami kesulitan dalam hal memenuhi syarat adanya persetujuan korban. Artikel ini merekomendasikan jika anak melakukan tindak pidana pemilu yang memenuhi syarat untuk dilakukan diversi, maka diversi dilaksanakan dengan melibatkan Bawaslu sebagai representasi korban untuk memberikan persetujuan diversi karena Bawaslu merupakan representasi negara yang mewakili kepentingan korban, baik masyarakat, pasangan calon, maupun negara. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga merekomendasikan diperlukannya penyesuaian ius constituendum aturan kepemiluan mengatur secara expressive verbiss pelaksanaan pemenuhan syarat dalam pelaksanaan diversi yang telah diatur dalam UU SPPA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andini, Orin Gusta, Nilasari, and Andreas Avelino Eurian. “Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: A Utopia.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 1 (2023): 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247.

Andiraharja, Diyar Ginanjar. “Politik Hukum Pada Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu.” Khazanah Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v2i1.7681.

Ardan, Isnaeni, Hambali Thalib, and Lauddin Marsuni. “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Kejaksaan Dalam Penerapan Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS) 2, no. 3 (2022): 404–17.

Baranovska, Tetiana, Oleh Ihnatiuk, Stanislav Sokha, Lidiia Moskvych, and Olena Dragan. “Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Legal Responsibility in Criminal Justice.” Multidisciplinary Science Journal 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0737.

Block, Steven. “Victimless Crime.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition 25 (2015): 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.45092-0.

Carreras, Miguel, and Giancarlo Visconti. “Who Pays for Crime? Criminal Violence, Right-Wing Incumbents, and Electoral Accountability in Latin America.” Electoral Studies 79, no. September (2022): 102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102522.

Chandra, Erika Magdalena. “Victimless Crime in Indonesia: Should We Punished Them?” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 216–32. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a1.

Desiandri, Yati, Madiasa Ablisar, Marlina Marlina, and Edy Ikhsan. “Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Di Tingkat Penyidikan (Studi Di Polresta Medan).” Usu Law Journal 5, no. 1 (2017): 147–57.

Fahmi, Khairul. “Sistem Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 264. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1224.

Firdaus, Firdaus, Nalom Kurniawan, Muhammad Uut Lutfi, and Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya. “The Scope of Competence of the Constitutional Court in Deciding Disputes of General Election Results.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 2 (2024): 316–44. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2129.

Fuentes, Francisco Maldonado. “Crimes Related to Public Contributions Intended for Electoral Purposes Francisco.” Politica Criminal 19, no. February (2024): 4–6. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992024000100215.

Hasbi, Mhd., and Tengku Mabar Ali. “Kelemahan Regulasi Tindak Pidana Pemilu Dalam Upaya Mencegah Dan Menanggulangi Praktik Politik Uang (Money Politic).” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 05, no. 02 (2024): 32–42. https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Judge/index.

I Made Sugita. “Penerapan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum.” Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2022): 187–211. https://ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/satya-dharma.

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Yogyakarta: Mitra Buana Media, 2020.

Junaidi, Muhammad. “TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU DAN PILKADA OLEH SENTRA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERPADU.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 2 (2020): 220–34.

Keith, Shelley. “Making Connections: Assessing Restorative Justice Processes and Values in a Juvenile Justice Diversion Program.” Criminal Justice Studies 38, no. 2 (April 3, 2025): 133–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2025.2508058.

Klimova, Yulia N. “The Dispositions and Sanctions of Russian and Foreign Criminal Laws on Liability for Falsifying Election Results.” Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law 9, no. 3 (2015): 547–59. https://doi.org/10.17150/1996-7756.2015.9(3).547-559.

Maran, Alfian Mela, Yusti Probowati, Ajuni Ajuni, and Mary Philia Elisabeth. “Proses Diversi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum: Belajar Dari Sistem Diversi Di Amerika Serikat.” Binamulia Hukum 13, no. 2 (2024): 555–71. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.957.

Muchlis, Ahmad. “Penegakan Prinsip Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Pada Penerapan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 12, no. 1 (2024): 66–77.

Mulyani, Tri, and Sukimin Sukimin. “Pelibatan Anak Dalam Kegiatan Kampanye Politik.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 365–84. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2877.

Nurhaliza, Rina, Herry Liyus, and Dheny Wahyudi. “Pelaksanaan Kesepakatan Diversi Pada Tingkat Penyidikan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 1 (2021): 110–24. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8097.

Nwozor, Agaptus, and John Shola Olanrewaju. “Power Contests Beyond the Electoral Arena: The Dynamics and Challenges of Election Management and Consolidation in Nigeria BT - Anonymous Power: Parties, Interest Groups and Politics of Decision Making in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic (Essays in Honour of El.” edited by Okechukwu Ibeanu, Israel ’Kelue Okoye, Ikenna Mike Alumona, and Ernest Toochi Aniche, 169–89. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6058-0_8.

Perrella, Lucrezia, Ernesto Lodi, Gian Luigi Lepri, and Patrizia Patrizi. “Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices in Prison: A Systematic Literature Review.” Rassegna Italiana Di Criminologia 18, no. 1 (2024): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.7347/RIC-012024-p69.

Ponce, Aldo F, Rodrigo Velázquez López Velarde, and Jaime Sáinz Santamaría. “Do Local Elections Increase Violence? Electoral Cycles and Organized Crime in Mexico.” Trends in Organized Crime 25, no. 1 (2022): 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-019-09373-8.

Posumah Dina Ayudectina, Rimbing Nontje, and Sepang Max. “Prosedur Pelaksanaan Diversi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Lex Privatum XI, no. 3 (2023).

Ratomi, Achmad. “Konsep Prosedur Pelaksanaan Diversi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak.” Arena Hukum 6, no. 3 (2013): 394–407. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00603.6.

Saputra, Haris Dwi, and Muhammad Miswarik. “Implementasi Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.” Inicio Legis 2, no. 1 (2021): 36–50. https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v2i1.11071.

Singaruju, Rayendra Erwin Moeslimin. “Establishment of a General Election Court System in Indonesia.” Prophetic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2022): 48–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol4.iss1.art3.

Sodikin, Sodikin. “Pemilihan Umum Menurut Hukum Islam.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 15, no. 1 (2019): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v15i1.2848.

Sulistyoningsih, Dewi Permatasari. “PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU (Studi Terhadap Pelanggaran Pemilu Di Indonesia).” Sulistyoningsih 1, no. November (2015): 219–28.

Summersett Williams, Faith, Rachel M Sax, Noel C Slesinger, Neil Jordan, Doug Sharp, Noshwerwan Yazin, Zoran Martinovich, and Tracy Fehrenbach. “An Examination of a Juvenile Justice Diversion Program for Youth with Mental Health Needs and Traumatic Stress Symptoms: A Strengths-Based Approach.” Psychology, Crime & Law 30, no. 7 (August 8, 2024): 653–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2109632.