Beyond 50:50 of Matrimonial Asset: Applying the Contra Legem Principle in Marital Property Division in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v7i1.43606Keywords:
Contra Legem Principle, Itikad baik, Divorce, Joint property, Harta BersamaAbstract
This paper investigates the legal and ethical implications of deviating from the equal (50:50) distribution of marital property in Indonesian divorce cases, particularly when one spouse acts in bad faith. While Indonesian law—namely Article 35 of the Marriage Law and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law—generally upholds equal division of joint property, this study highlights how courts may apply the contra legem principle to achieve substantive justice. Using a normative legal method, the research examines regulations and judicial discretion in reallocating marital assets when faced with evidence of misconduct, unequal contributions, or financial manipulation. The study draws from comparative legal systems and landmark court decisions to illustrate how contra legem serves not as a defiance of law, but as a mechanism to protect vulnerable spouses and promote fairness. It concludes that flexible, contribution-based distribution, supported by judicial transparency and evidentiary standards, better reflects the realities of modern marriages and ensures just outcomes within Indonesia’s dual legal framework.
Downloads
References
Anderson, Siwan. “Legal Origins and Female HIV”. American Economic Review 108, no 6 (01 Junie 2018): 1407–39. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151047.
Anwar, Khairil, en Sri Ikamulia. “PERKARA IZIN POLIGAMI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BENGKALIS (Analisis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Nomor: 0307/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Bkls)”. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 18, no 2 (2019): 163 – 174. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v18i2.1656.
Arnórsdóttir, Agnes S. Death and donation: Different channels of property transfer in late medieval Iceland. The Marital Economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400-1900, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315238418-25.
Arnull, Anthony. “European Union Law and the Contra Legem Principle”. European Law Review 47, no 3 (2022): 291 – 309. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132590571&partnerID=40&md5=d9c7f20a98da6ae242b2fc3a1281b34a.
Awiety, Jomana Mohamed Sabri, en Abdul Kadir Riyadi. “HISTORY OF JOINT MARITAL PROPERTY IN INDONESIA AND ITS LEGALIZATION”. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 8, no 2 (2020): 94 – 112. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol8no2.256.
Bary, Christiane von. “Distribution of family property in Germany: family law and beyond”. In Research Handbook on Family Property and the Law, 278–91. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204681.00026.
Brown, Nahum. “Sartre and the Modality of Bad Faith: The Contingency Debate”. Kritike 18, no 1 (2024): 31 – 46. https://doi.org/10.25138/18.1.A1.
Buckley, Lucy-Ann. “Irish matrimonial property division in practice: A case study”. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21, no 1 (2007): 48 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebl021.
Chen, Wei, Xin Zhang, en Lei Shi. “Empirical Research on Protecting Women’s Property Rights in Divorce Proceedings in China”. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 32, no 1 (2018): 109 – 118. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebx016.
Cohen, Mathilde, Hawa Allan, Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov, Lenni Benson, Jessica Clarke, Ashley Deeks, Erin Delaney, et al. “When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons: A Comparative When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons: A Comparative Law Approach Law Approach When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons: A Comparative Law Approach”. Washington and Lee Law Review 72: 3–4. Toegang verkry 28 April 2025. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol72/iss2/3.
Correya, Stalin Joseph. “Not Just Lying to Oneself: An Examination of Bad Faith in Sartre”. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 38, no 1 (2021): 103 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-021-00232-y.
Dagan, Hanoch, en Carolyn J Frantz. Properties of Marriage. Property: Values and Institutions, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737864.003.0022.
Draguiev, Deyan. “Bad faith conduct of states in violation of the ‘fair and equitable treatment’ standard in international investment law and arbitration”. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5, no 2 (2014): 273 – 305. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idu002.
Faradilla Asyatama, en Fully Handayani Ridwan. “Analisis Perjanjian Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan Di Indonesia”. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no 2 (25 Desember 2021): 109–22. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3937.
Fikri, Fikri, Aris Aris, Saidah Saidah, Nurul Fitra Ramadhan, en Rizal Darwis. “Contextualization of Rights and Justice through Exceptions in the Counterclaim of Marital Property Lawsuit”. Al-Mizan 19, no 2 (12 Desember 2023): 227–48. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v19i2.4144.
Gashi, Haxhi, en Bashkim Preteni. “MARRIAGE AND PROPERTY REGIME OF SPOUSES UNDER KOSOVO CURRENT LAW AND DRAFT – CIVIL CODE; [BRAK I IMOVINSKI REŽIM IZMEĐU BRAČNIH DRUGOVA PREMA AKTUALNOM ZAKONU I PREMA NACRTU GRAĐANSKOG ZAKONIKA KOSOVA]”. Pravni Vjesnik 36, no 3–4 (2020): 309 – 323. https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/10800.
Ghambaryan, A S. “DEVELOPMENT OF LAW CONTRARY TO THE LEGAL ACTS (CONTRA LEGEM) IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA”. Gosudarstvo i Pravo 2023, no 5 (2023): 145 – 157. https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520025195-5.
Ibrahim, Norliah, Nora Abdul Hak, en Roslina Che Soh. “Duty of full and frank disclosure in the division of matrimonial property: The law and practice in Malaysia”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6, no 11 (2012): 306 – 311. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84871804315&partnerID=40&md5=4e719e37b7c3660ddddb9b95aac8b14e.
Jayusman, en Zuhri Imansyah. “The decision on joint properties in Bengkulu high religious court jurisdiction”. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 21, no 1 (2021): 99 – 134. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.99-134.
Jedrzejewska, Ewa. Division of joint property of spouses after termination of marital property: Selected practical problems. Family, Law, and Society: from Roman Law to the Present Day, 2023. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183758995&partnerID=40&md5=70cea5bbf8837078e7db5301559abde1.
Jungo, Alexandra, en Laura von Arb. Switzerland: participation in acquisitions. Research Handbook on Family Property and the Law, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204681.00031.
Kurniawan, Justicia Firdaus, Dominikus Rato, en Moh Ali. “Mixed Marriage Law On Marital Property Due To Divorce”. Mimbar Yustitia: Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 8, no 2 (2024): 111–23. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v7i2.
Kurniawan, Muhamad Beni. “KONSEP PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA BERDASARKAN KONTRIBUSI DALAM PERKAWINAN”. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 17, no 2 (05 Julie 2017). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v17i2.4741.
Liu, Liantai. “On the property division rules of the judicial interpretation (III) of the marriage law of China”. Frontiers of Law in China 7, no 4 (2012): 656 – 667. https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-001-012-0031-3.
Marlina, Siti, en Haris Mubarak. “JOINT PROPERTY AFTER DIVORCE IN POLYGAMOUS MARRIAGE: Comparative Research in Indonesia and Malaysia”. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 22, no 2 (2022): 273 – 287. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i2.1289.
Melia, Muzakkir Abubakar, en Darmawan. “SHARING ASSISTANCE AFTER DIVORCE (STUDY OF SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 597K/Ag/2016; [PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA SETELAH PERCERAIAN (Studi terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 597K/Ag/2016)]”. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 7, no 3 (2019): 506 – 518. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.665.
Merrill, Thomas W, en Henry E Smith. “Optimal standardization in the law of property: The numerus clausus principle”. Yale Law Journal 110, no 1 (2000): 1 – 70. https://doi.org/10.2307/797586.
Mesraini. “The Concept of Joint Assets and its Implementation in the Religious Court.; [KONSEP HARTA BERSAMA DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA]”. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 12, no 1 (2012): 59 – 70. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v12i1.980.
Moldovan, Iosif Florin. “Matrimonial Regimes”. Journal of Legal Studies 16, no 30 (01 Desember 2015): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/jles-2015-0010.
Mutiso, Benedeta. “Getting to Equal: Resolving the Judicial Impasse on the Weight of Non-Monetary Contribution in Kenya’s Marital Asset Division”. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, no 26.1 (2019): 121. https://doi.org/10.36641/mjgl.26.1.getting.
Nazar, Mirosław. “Gloss to the resolution of the supreme court of 19 october 2018 (iii czp 45/18). substitution of assets in personal (separate) properties of spouses under the joint marital property; [Glosa do uchwały sądu najwyższego z dnia 19 października 2018 r. (iii c”. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 29, no 3 (2020): 267 – 276. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.3.267-276.
Niglia, Leone. “Conforming Interpretation”. European Review of Private Law 30, no 4 (2022): 635 – 658. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022031.
Nutz, Theresa, Anika Nelles, en Philipp M. Lersch. “Who Opts Out? The Customisation of Marriage in the German Matrimonial Property Regime”. European Journal of Population 38, no 3 (23 Augustus 2022): 353–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09613-8.
Parkinson, Patrick. “Family Property Division and the Principle of Judicial Restraint”. University of New South Wales Law Journal 41, no 2 (Mei 2018). https://doi.org/10.53637/XHPU9987.
Pelu, Ibnu Elmi As, en Ahmad Dakhoir. “MARITAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE MARRIAGE LAW A Debate on Legal Position and Actual Applications”. Al-Jami’ah 59, no 2 (2021): 287 – 316. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.287-316.
Rosettenstein, David S. “Big money divorces and unequal distributions: Value, risk, liquidity and other issues on the road to unfairness”. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 19, no 2 (2005): 206 – 217. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebi015.
Semerdzhiev, Angel. “Bankruptcy in divorce: The litigation tactic of the angry spouse”. Family Court Review 61, no 1 (2023): 189 – 202. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12698.
SHCHERBANYUK, Oksana, Vіtalii GORDIEIEV, en Laura BZOVA. “Legal nature of the principle of legal certainty as a component element of the rule of law”. Juridical Tribune 13, no 1 (31 Maart 2023). https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/1.02.
Singkep, Pengadilan Agama Dabo. “YURISPRUDENSI TENTANG PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA”. Sistem Informasi Data Perkara (SIDARA), 2018.
Spaht, Katherine Shaw. “Postmodern Marriage as Seen through the Lens of the ALI’s ‘Compensatory Payments’”. In Reconceiving the Family, 249–68. Cambridge University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617706.015.
Stikāne, Līga. “The Right of the Spouses to Choose the Law Applicable to their Matrimonial Property Regime in a Marital Agreement”. In Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I, 286–300. LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2019. https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.25.
Sukiati, Nurasiah, en Milhan. “Approaches of the Religious Court Judges in Indonesia to Settle Joint Marital Property Disputes”. Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice 19, no 3 (2023): 71 – 81. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175811302&partnerID=40&md5=2c94706fe183870aa191af8a651d2607.
Wei, Jiaxu. “RELIGIOUS ETHICS AND THE MORAL FOUNDATIONS OF MARITAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF SPOUSAL OWNERSHIP AND THE MARRIAGE LAW”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 17, no 2 (2025): 210 – 226. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2025.4671.
Undang-Undang Republik Indoneia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3019)
Undang-Undang Republik Indoneia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076)
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1975 Nomor 12, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3050)
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Penyebarluasan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3019)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Afriansyah Tanjung, Moh. Lubsi Tuqo Romadhan, Maela Khoirul Ummah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Authors(s) retain copyrights of the Article published on Recital Review. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.Â
