Analisis Yuridis Atas Akta Notaris Yang Cacat Hukum Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum

Authors

  • Dripsy Teresa P. Sapni Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v7i2.46980

Keywords:

Notary, Authentic Deed, Legal Defects, Accountability, Legal Certainty

Abstract

Notaries have an important role in ensuring legal certainty through the creation of authentic deeds. However, in practice, there are various cases where deeds made by notaries contain legal defects, resulting in cancellation or cancellation by law by the court. This study aims to analyze the factors causing legal defects in notarial deeds, the form of notary accountability, and its legal enforcement against the parties. This study uses a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, by reviewing regulations, scientific journals, and related court decisions. The results of the study indicate that notaries can be held accountable for both civil, administrative, and criminal, depending on the level of error made. In addition, deeds containing legal defects have the potential to cause legal uncertainty and losses for the parties involved. Therefore, stricter supervision of notarial practices and increased notary professionalism are needed, so that cases of legal defects in deeds can be minimized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardini, Shela. “Otoritas Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Mengusulkan Pemberhentian Tidak Hormat Notaris Kepada Majelis Pengawas Pusat.” Gorontalo Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 454–65.

Dedy Mulyana, S H. “Tanggung jawab notaris/ppat terhadap akta jual beli tanah yang batal demi hukum.” Juris and Society: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial dan Humaniora 1, no. 1 (2021): 106–18.

Huda, Muhammad Chairul, dan M H S HI. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Pendekatan Yuridis Sosiologis). The Mahfud Ridwan Institute, 2021.

Mido, Citra, Muhammad Tiantanik, I Nyoman Nurjaya, dan Rachmad Safa’at. “Tanggung Jawab Perdata Notaris terhadap Akta yang Dibacakan oleh Staf Notaris di Hadapan Penghadap.” Lentera Hukum 5 (2018): 171.

Muyassar, Muyassar, Dahlan Ali, dan Suhaimi Suhaimi. “Pertanggungjawaban hukum notaris terhadap pengingkaran akta jual beli tanah bersertipikat oleh pihak yang dirugikan.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 147–66.

Putri, Kerina Maulidya, Ichsan Anwary, dan Diana Haiti. “Kewajiban Notaris melakukan Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta di Depan Semua Pihak secara Bersama-Sama.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2022): 157–75.

Rante, Marchelina, dan Hernita Matana. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Terhadap Indikasi Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dibuat.” Paulus Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2021): 29–38.

Sihite, Chaterine Felicia. “Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Dijatuhi Sanksi Administratif Oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris.” Jurnal Notarius 2, no. 1 (2023).

Wibowo, Wahyu Satya, Johni Najwan, dan Firdaus Abu Bakar. “Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Recital Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 323–52.

Wulandari, Anak Agung Deby. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Batalnya Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Karena Cacat Hukum.” Udayana University, 2019.

Zulfar, M Afrizal. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terkait Penggunaan Identitas Palsu Penghadap Dalam Pembuatan Akta.” Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA 2, no. 1 (2024): 319–28.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Teresa P. Sapni , D. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Atas Akta Notaris Yang Cacat Hukum Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum. Recital Review, 7(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v7i2.46980