Sengketa Merek Dagang ‘Ayam Geprek Bensu’ Versus ‘I Am Geprek Bensu’

Authors

  • Amelia Puspita Sari Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia
  • Fokky Fuad Wasitaatmadja Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v8i1.48516

Keywords:

Trademark, UMKM, first to file, Bensu, legal protection

Abstract

The trademark dispute between Ayam Geprek Bensu and I Am Geprek Bensu highlights the complexity of trademark protection in Indonesia, particularly when involving public figures and large-scale business interests. At the core of this dispute is the application of the first to file principle under Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, which affirms that legal ownership is determined by formal registration rather than prior use in commerce. This issue is not only relevant due to its controversy but also because it reflects the vulnerability of Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Many UMKM, despite operating for years, have been compelled to discontinue their brands after third parties registered them earlier. Such cases expose weaknesses in legal protection and demonstrate the limited awareness of UMKM regarding the necessity of formal trademark registration. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing both case study and statutory approaches to analyze the legal foundations, judicial reasoning, and consequences of applying the first to file system. Furthermore, it evaluates the extent to which Indonesia’s trademark regime influences the legal standing of UMKM and examines their capacity to safeguard business identity when competing against parties with greater resources and faster access to formal registration.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Application, International, Published Under, T H E Patent, Cooperation Treaty, International Publication Number, International Publication Date, dan Designated States. 2020. “Wipo i.” (12): 492.

Arifin, Zaenal, dan Muhammad Iqbal. 2020. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5(1): 47. doi:10.26623/jic.v5i1.2217.

Gaumi, Shellen Dhea Af, dan Rudy Hartono. 2022. “Analisa Hukum Sengketa Merek Dagang Geprek Bensu Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 196/G/2020/PTUN-JKT).” Jurnal Darma Agung 30(196): 75–90.

Gultom, Meli Hertati. 2014. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Merek Terhadap Perbuatan Pelanggaran Merek.” Jurnal Warta 56(April): 97–108.

Hukum, Fakultas, dan Universitas Pasundan. 2024. “Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.5. No.8 (Agustus 2024) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Pemerintahan (Bulan Kedelapan) https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/.” 5(8): 1–15.

Irayadi, Muhammad. 2021. “ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM HUKUM PERJANJIAN Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam, Jakarta.” Hermeneutika 5(1): 2021. http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/HERMENEUTIKA.

Latifiani, Dian. 2022. “Benda Bagi Hak Cipta Atau Merk Perusahaan.” Supremasi Hukum :Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 31(1): 66–74.

Mafulah, Hanim. 2020. “Pengecualian Perjanjian yang Berkaitan Paten dan Lisensinya dalam Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1(2): 87–103. doi:10.37276/sjh.v1i2.55.

Magister, Pascasarjana, Ilmu Hukum, dan Universitas Islam. 2023. “Indragiri Law Review.” 1(1): 19–24.

Maileni, Dwi Afni. 2018. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang di Kota Batam.” Jurnal Trias Politika 2(1): 117. doi:10.33373/jtp.v2i1.1239.

Maulidina, Hanifah Isyana, dan Devi Siti Hamzah Marpaung. 2022. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Melalui Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999.” JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora 9(1): 475–87. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia.

Nurlani, Meirina. 2022. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan 3(1): 27. doi:10.32502/khdk.v3i1.4519.

Panjaitan, Hulman. 2018. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia.” To-Ra 4(1): 29. doi:10.33541/tora.v4i1.1170.

Oksidelfa Yanto. 2015. “KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA DALAM RANAH HUKUM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (Studi Kritis Pembajakan Karya Cipta Musik dalam Bentuk VCD dan DVD).” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 93(3): 746–60. doi:10.20961/yustisia.v93i0.3702.

Perdana, Karlina, dan , Pujiyono. 2017. “KELEMAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK DALAM HAL PENDAFTARAN MEREK (Studi Atas Putusan Sengketa Merek Pierre Cardn).” Jurnal Privat Law 5(2): 84. doi:10.20961/privat.v5i2.19398.

Rafianti, Laina. 2015. “Perkembangan Hukum Merek di Indonesia.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7(1). doi:10.25041/fiatjustisia.v7no1.364.

Rahadatul ‘Aisy, Firsta. 2022. “Efektivitas Perjanjian Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lisensi Merek Dagang di Indonesia.” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia 1(12): 1266–72. doi:10.58344/jii.v1i12.1302.

Ramin, Moh. 2023. “Sengketa Merek Dagang Di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur.” ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies 1(1): 23–30. doi:10.61397/ays.v1i1.6.

Sinaga, Niru Anita. 2020. “Pentingnya Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Sasana 6(2): 150–51.

Surnaryo, Euis. 2019. “Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Pembatik.” Journal of Intellectual Property 1(1): 5–6.

Syafira, Viona Talitha. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Superman Terhadap Pelanggaran Merek.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 3(1): 85. doi:10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p85-114.

Tektona, Rahmadi Indra. 2013. “Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 6(1): 86–94.

Yeti Andrias, Maria, Najamuddin Gani, Abdul Rahman Upara, dan Mukti Stofel. 2024. “Hak Milik Intelektual dalam Era Globalisasi: Tantangan Hukum dan Kebijakan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 4(4): 747–61. doi:10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2063.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-25

How to Cite

Puspita Sari, A., & Fuad Wasitaatmadja , F. (2026). Sengketa Merek Dagang ‘Ayam Geprek Bensu’ Versus ‘I Am Geprek Bensu’. Recital Review, 8(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v8i1.48516