When Peace is Personalized: The Clash between the BoP Charter and Indonesia’s Free and Active Foreign Policy

Authors

  • Rudi Natamiharja Faculty of Law, University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia.
  • Robi Cahyadi Kurniawan Faculty of Social and Political Science, University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia.
  • Ovide Egide Manzanga Kpanya Faculty of Law, Universite Pedagogique Nationale, The Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Rainnade Geojona Ablin Faculty of Law, University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v7i1.53260

Keywords:

board of peace;, international law;, indonesian constitutional law;, bebas aktif policy; , sovereign policy.

Abstract

Background: This article critically examines the legal and constitutional implications of Indonesia’s engagement with the "Board of Peace" (BoP), an emerging ad hoc entity in global peace governance. It highlights the systemic tension between established multilateral frameworks and the BoP’s "Chairman-centric" model, which represents a shift from rule-based to person-based international authority. Methodology: This study employs a normative legal research method to compare the BoP Charter, the United Nations Charter, and Indonesia’s domestic legal framework. Objectives: The research, aims to evaluate the compatibility of the BoP’s centralized governance with the principles of sovereign equality, modern multilateralism, and Indonesia’s constitutional mandate of a "Bebas Aktif" (free and active) foreign policy. Findings: The analysis reveals that the BoP’s institutional design—characterized by unfettered discretionary power vested in a single office—breaks the "chain of democratic delegation" required by Article 1 of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Furthermore, it risks creating "functional subordination" that undermines Law No. 37 of 1999 on Foreign Relations. Conclusion: Consequently, the study argues that Indonesia should utilize the period prior to ratification as a "constitutional firewall" to protect its strategic autonomy and domestic legal integrity. Novelty: This research provides a pioneering analysis of the BoP Charter through the lens of Indonesian constitutionalism, offering a critical perspective on how middle powers in the Global South should navigate ad hoc governance initiatives that bypass traditional UN-centric multilateralism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belhaj, Ferid. Legalized Power? The Board of Peace and The Governance of Conflict. n.d.

Biermann, Frank, Philipp Pattberg, Harro Van Asselt, and Fariborz Zelli. ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’. Global Environmental Politics 9, no. 4 (November 2009): 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.

Bijos, Leila, and Renan De Souza. ‘Private Military Companies and the Outsourcing of War: A Spark of Destabilisation to the Global Security’. Annales de La Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, ahead of print, 15 March 2020. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2020.69.0004.

Buchanan, Allen, and Robert O. Keohane. ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’. Ethics & International Affairs 20, no. 4 (December 2006): 405–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x.

Cai, Congyan, Larissa Van Den Herik, and Tiyanjana Maluwa. The UN Security Council and the Maintenance of Peace in a Changing World. 1st edn. Edited by Anne Peters and Christian Marxsen. Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009423458.

———. The UN Security Council and the Maintenance of Peace in a Changing World. 1st edn. Edited by Anne Peters and Christian Marxsen. Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009423458.

———. The UN Security Council and the Maintenance of Peace in a Changing World. 1st edn. Edited by Anne Peters and Christian Marxsen. Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009423458.

Charter of The Board of Peace (2026).

Ciorciari, John D., and Jürgen Haacke. ‘Hedging in International Relations: An Introduction’. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 19, no. 3 (September 2019): 367–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz017.

Dellmuth, Lisa, and Jonas Tallberg. Legitimacy Politics: Elite Communication and Public Opinion in Global Governance. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222020.

Hoon, Marieke De. ‘Equality and Consistency as Antidotes to the Board-of-Peace-World’. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 44, no. 1 (March 2026): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519261429403.

Ikenberry, G. John. ‘The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 16, no. 3 (September 2015): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109915000158.

Institutional Sources of Legitimacy for International Organisations: Beyond Procedure versus Performance | Review of International Studies | Cambridge Core. n.d. Accessed 22 April 2026. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/institutional-sources-of-legitimacy-for-international-organisations-beyond-procedure-versus-performance/AE6F86C3936E6BFD02740B30F4123EDE.

Kelsen, Hans. The Principle of Sovereign Equality of States as a Basis for International Organization on JSTOR. 53, no. 2 (n.d.). Accessed 22 April 2026. https://www.jstor.org/stable/792798?origin=crossref.

Latif, Lyla. ‘The Privatisation of Peace under the Charter of the Board of Peace’. SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6134747.

Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 1999 Concerning Foreign Relations, No. 37. Accessed 23 April 2026. http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45358/uu-no-37-tahun-1999.

Michaelsen, Christopher. ‘Collective Security and the Prohibition on the Use of Force in Times of Global Transition’. The Australian Year Book of International Law Online 38, no. 1 (December 2020): 78–109. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660229_03801005.

Morse, Julia C., and Robert O. Keohane. ‘Contested Multilateralism’. The Review of International Organizations 9, no. 4 (December 2014): 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9188-2.

———. ‘Contested Multilateralism’. The Review of International Organizations 9, no. 4 (December 2014): 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9188-2.

Murphy, Ben L. ‘Situating the Accountability of the UN Security Council: Between Liberal-Legal and Political “Styles” of Global Constitutionalism?’ Global Constitutionalism 10, no. 3 (November 2021): 465–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381720000222.

Natamiharja, Rudi, Rudy Rudy, and Chaidir Ali. ‘Law Making Treaties: The Implication of International Law towards Indonesia’s Legislations’. Jambe Law Journal 3, no. 2 (April 2021): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.3.2.191-210.

Osland, Kari M., and Mateja Peter. ‘UN Peace Operations in a Multipolar Order: Building Peace through the Rule of Law and Bottom-up Approaches’. Contemporary Security Policy 42, no. 2 (April 2021): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1898166.

Refworld. ‘Indonesia: Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hubungan Luar Negeri (Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 Year 1999 on Foreign Relations)’. Accessed 23 April 2026. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1999/en/147504.

Sanchez, Maria A. ‘The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Forging a Jurisdictional Frontier in Post-Colonial Human Rights’. International Journal of Law in Context 19, no. 3 (September 2023): 352–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552323000046.

Setiawati, Siti Mutiah. ‘The Role of Indonesian Government in Middle East Conflict Resolution: Consistent Diplomacy or Strategic Shifts?’ Frontiers in Political Science 6 (March 2024): 1304108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304108.

Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. 5. ed., 5. print. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.

Silalahi, Artha Debora. ‘Rekonstruksi Pengawasan DPR RI Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Melalui Kerangka Demokrasi Konstitusional’. Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi 3, no. 2 (December 2023). https://doi.org/10.7454/JKD.v3i2.1306.

Thakur, Harish K. ‘Restoring Multilateralism: The Challenge from the Global South and the Rising Minilaterals’. The Round Table 113, no. 6 (November 2024): 556–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2024.2439673.

Zürn, Michael, Alexandros Tokhi, and Martin Binder. ‘The International Authority Database’. Global Policy 12, no. 4 (September 2021): 430–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12971.

In Respecting the UN Charter | Empowering the UN Security Council: Reforms to Address Modern Threats | Oxford Academic. Oxford University Press, n.d. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197780602.003.0002.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Natamiharja, R., Kurniawan, R. C., Kpanya, O. E. M., & Ablin, R. G. (2026). When Peace is Personalized: The Clash between the BoP Charter and Indonesia’s Free and Active Foreign Policy . Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 7(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v7i1.53260

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.