Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 46/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023/PN Pbr Pada Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Dalam Kasus Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v6i3.44911Keywords:
Pemutusan hubungan Kerja, Mutasi kerja, Hubungan IndustrialAbstract
The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal considerations in Decision Number 46/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023/PN Pbr related to the case of termination of employment (PHK) between Yosep Primadona (worker) and PT Eluan Mahkota (employer). The problem of this research is how the legal considerations in Decision Number 46/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023/PN Pbr are viewed from juridical, philosophical, and sociological aspects. Normative juridical research method using conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The results showed that the panel of judges decided that the mutations and layoffs carried out by the company were invalid because they were contrary to Article 32 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The judges' considerations cover three aspects, based on the juridical aspect, the mutations and layoffs did not fulfill legal procedures, including the absence of prior notification and violation of Company Regulations, based on the philosophical aspect, the decision is based on the principles of substantive justice, balance of rights, and respect for the dignity of workers, based on the sociological aspect, the decision pays attention to the social impact of layoffs on workers and emphasizes the importance of protecting workers' rights in industrial relations. This decision reflects the application of the principles of legal certainty, justice, and worker protection, as well as emphasizing that layoffs must be the last resort (ultima ratio).
Downloads
References
Aloysius Uwiyono, Asas-Asas Hukum Perburuhan, Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
Imam Budi Santoso, Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial: Dalam Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2024.
Lalu Husni, Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010, hlm.107.
Lanny Ramli, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2008.
Moch. Faisal Salam, Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan Industrial di Indonesia , Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, 2009.
R. Goenawan Oetomo, Pengantar Hukum Perburuhan Dan Hukum Perburuhan Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Grhadika Binangkit Press, 2010.
Sehat Damanik, Hukum Acara Perburuhan , Jakarta: Dss Publishing, 2006.
Zainal Asikin, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
Annisa Asrini Makkuasa, et al., “Peran Hakim Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Terhadap Perkara Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja,” Jurnal Filsafat Lex (JLP) 5 no. 2 (2024):1100-1113. https://mail.pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1882.
Hasna Hanifah Astiti, et al., "Kajian Yuridis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Oleh Perusahaan Terhadap Pekerja Yang Menolak Mutasi." Estudiante Law Journal 3.3 (2021): 358-371. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/eslaw/index
Jihan Rafifah et al., “Implementasi Dan Tantangan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pekerja Dalam Hubungan Kerja Di Indonesia,” Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikas 2 (2025): 147–57, https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i1.626.
Mivtahur, Faradiba, Muskibah, dan Yetniwati. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Yang Mengalami Kecelakaan Kerja Pada CV. Nusa Indotama”. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law 3 (2022): 23-33. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v3i1.12249.
Raditya Pratomo, et al., “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja yang Uang Pesangon dan atau Penghargaan Masa Kerja Tidak Dibayar Oleh Pengusaha,” Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal, 2 no. 1 (2024):807-818. https://doi.org/10.57185/mutiara.v2i1.126
Risnawati Liani Putri, and Mahyuni. "Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dengan Alasan Penolakan Mutasi," Lex Positivis 1.3 (2023): 208-221. https://jtamfh.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jtamfh/article/view/38
Rudi Febrianto Wibowo and Ratna Herawati, “Perlindungan Bagi Pekerja Atas Tindakan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) Secara Sepihak,” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021): 109–20, https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.109-120.
Yulianis Satul Faidhah, et al.,“Optimalisasi Kebijakan Ketenagakerjaan Untuk Mengatasi Dampak Phk Massal Dan Meningkatkan Perlindungan Pekerja,” Jurnal Pengembangan Ketenagakerjaan 2 no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.59574/jpk.v2i2.118.
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.
Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 46/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023/PN Pbr
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafi Saputra, Yetniwati, Novianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All material published on Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
