Konstruksi Yuridis Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Atas Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat
(Pendekatan Kewenangan Peradilan Agama)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v6i3.45613Keywords:
tort, Religious Court, jurisdictionAbstract
The domestic violence-grounded divorce lawsuit in Religious Court has never followed by a claim for compensation despite the wife suffers losses. In fact, the Religious Court has jurisdiction on property disputes or other civil disputes among moslems. The reason of the fact was the intersection authority to proceed claim of compensation due to domestic violence between General Court and Religious Court. Consequently, we have yet to reach an optimum legal protection for the wife due to claim for compensation mechanism still considered under the authority of General Court. The research is a normative research and uses a statutory approach. The problems studied: 1. What is the point of authority intersection to proceed cases of civil tort between Religious Court and General Court?; 2. What is the legal construction of combining divorce cases with claims for compensation for domestic violence? The results of the study indicate that the provisions of Article 50 of Law No. 3 of 2006 provide legal basis for the Religious Court to proceed claim for compensation of its particular case. Claims for compensation in a divorce case are constructed as additional claims for unlawful acts in accordance with the principles of speedy administration justice.
Downloads
References
Asnawi, M. Natsir, Hukum Acara Perdata – Teori, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya di Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama, (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019).
Fuady, Munir, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Pendekatan Kontemporer, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013).
Harahap, M. Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006).
Manan, Abdul, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, (Jakarta: Yayasan Al Hikmah, 2000).
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (Liberty, Yogyakarta:1998).
Subekti, Hukum Acara Perdata, (Jakarta: Bina Cipta, 1977).
Enjang Nursolih, Analisis Penyusunan Surat Gugatan, (Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, Volume 7, Nomor 1, 2019).
Hasanuddin, Disertasi, “Gugatan Ganti Rugi Perdata Terhadap Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum di Bidang Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama,” (Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, 2019).
Purwosusilo, Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum dalam Berkas Kasasi dan PK, (Bogor: Materi Diklat Sertifikasi Ekonomi Syariah).
Febri, Peradilan Umum vs Peradilan Agama “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum”, (https://law.ugm.ac.id/peradilan-umum-vs-peradilan-agama-perbuatan-melawan-hukum/), dikakses pada 23 Maret 2025.
Laporan Kegiatan Tahun 2024 Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Laporan Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Perceraian Pada Pengadilan Agama Sleman Tahun 2024 (LIPA 10).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Natsir Asnawi, Fakhir Tashin Baaj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All material published on Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
