Article  
Method The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Learning Independence of Students on  
Chemistry Learning Achievement: Case Study State of 10th Grade Senior High  
School in Public High School 15 Pekanbaru  
Ayu Rahmawati Putri1, Lenny Anwar2*, Rasmiwetti3, Yesi Nursofia4  
1,2,3 Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Chemical Education, University of Riau, Pekanbaru-  
28293, Indonesia  
4College of Pharmacy, Taipe Medical University, No. 291, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan  
Abstract  
Self-efficacy and learning independence are important factors in improving chemistry learning  
achievement and these factors must be mastered by students. This study aims to determine the effect  
of self-efficacy and learning independence on chemistry learning achievement partially or  
simultaneously. This type of research is a survey-research with a quantitative approach. The data  
collection methods for this study are questionnaires and documentation. The self-efficacy and learning  
independence questionnaires used were 21 questions after being validated. The questionnaires were  
distributed to all samples of 119 students taken using the simple random sampling technique.  
Documentation was used to collect data on chemistry learning achievement scores. Data analysis used  
in this study was multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study showed (1) There is a positive  
and significant effect of self-efficacy partially on chemistry learning achievement, (2) there is a positive  
and significant effect of learning independence on learning achievement, (3) There is a positive and  
significant effect between self-efficacy and learning independence simultaneously on chemistry learning  
achievement.  
Keywords: Learning Achievement, Learning Independence, Self-Efficacy  
Graphical Abstract  
*
Corresponding author  
Received April 29th 2024; Accepted June 29th 2024; Available online June 30th 2024  
Copyright © 2024 by Authors, Published by Chempublish Journal. This is an open access article under the CC BY License  
42  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Introduction  
Individuals who have high self-efficacy tend to  
choose more challenging jobs, complete many  
tasks, do not give up easily so that they get good  
academic results. While individuals who have low  
self-efficacy will feel low self-confidence and give  
up easily.[5]. The actions taken by students when  
they have low self-efficacy are postponing the  
completion of tasks given by the teacher. This  
treatment causes high academic procrastination  
and means having low self-efficacy. Academic  
procrastination is also often done intentionally  
by postponing work. So teachers are expected to  
always carry out maximum supervision during  
Education continues to develop and is very  
important for life. Through education, it can  
create competent human resources (HR). The  
formation of quality HR is supported by several  
supporting factors and cannot be separated from  
the guidance of educators, so that the success of  
the implementation of education is achieved. In  
addition, the success of education can also be  
achieved through improving the quality of  
education[1]. The quality of education plays an  
important role in forming quality individuals with  
noble character. Improving the quality of  
education can develop individual skills and  
become a measuring tool in the success of the  
learning process. The creation of students who  
are rich in potential within themselves will bring  
changes to the quality of education in the  
future[2].  
the learning process [6]  
.
In addition to having high self-efficacy, there are  
other important factors to improve student  
learning  
achievement,  
namely  
learning  
independence. Learning independence is the  
ability of a student who wants to be independent  
in exploring information while learning. This  
independence emphasizes the active role of  
students in learning and being responsible for  
their learning success. Students who have strong  
learning independence will not give up easily.  
Learning independently does not necesserily  
learning individually, rather than a way of  
learning that emphasizes the independence of  
Educational success can be seen from the  
learning achievements achieved by students who  
have reached the target. One of the indicators  
used to measure learning success is learning  
outcomes that refer to an achievement. Student  
learning success can be seen from the value  
obtained after completing a task or learning, so  
that student abilities can be measured from the  
scores received for each learning[3]. As for  
learning chemistry, it is abstract and requires  
self-confidence in understanding the material, so  
that learning chemistry is less popular with  
students. This is because students find it difficult  
to understand and lack motivation to learn  
chemistry. Therefore, not a few students get low  
students  
in  
obtaining  
information  
and  
.
knowledge that does not depend on others [7]  
In reality, in the chemistry learning process,  
educators tend to be more active than students.  
The cause of low student learning independence  
is because they are accustomed to receiving  
material and always depending on the teacher.  
Therefore, teachers try to guide students into  
independent learning process[8]. Several relevant  
studies state that self-efficacy and learning  
independence can improve learning outcomes,  
one of which is a study conducted by Chairunnisa  
et al. (2021) with research results showing that  
self-efficacy partially has a significant effect on  
learning achievement results[4].  
A
difficult  
chemistry learning requires educators to be  
more creative in choosing interesting learning  
methods so that students' curiosity arises during  
learning and can improve students' learning  
achievement. In addition to conducive learning to  
understand chemistry material, students need to  
have important factors within themselves to  
improve learning achievement, namely self-  
confidence (self-efficacy).  
cognitive  
learning  
outcomes,  
learning  
independence has a partial positive effect on  
cognitive learning outcomes, and there is a  
positive influence of self-efficacy and learning  
independence simultaneously on the cognitive  
learning outcomes of 11th natural sicences grade  
students on the material on ion equilibrium in  
salt solutions[9].  
Self-efficacy is a belief in an individual in terms of  
motivating themselves, making changes in  
themselves, adapting themselves to the social  
environment and implementing the knowledge  
that has been mastered to carry out a task.  
43  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Based on the results of observations and  
interviews with chemistry teachers in 10th grade  
of Public High School 15 Pekanbaru, there are  
several problems faced during the chemistry  
learning process, namely that more than 50% of  
students' learning achievements have exceeded  
the set standards, but during the teaching and  
learning process they still find it difficult to  
understand chemistry material, actions taken by  
students such as still being hesitant in answering  
teacher questions, often ignoring material notes  
and even not doing chemistry assignments  
individually. Related to this description, it is  
necessary to make updates related to self-  
efficacy and learning independence to help  
educators in guiding students in improving  
learning achievement based on these important  
factors  
consisting of self-efficacy (X1) and learning  
independence (X2) and one dependent variable,  
namely chemistry learning achievement (Y). The  
data analysis technique used is multiple linear  
regression analysis.  
In this study, validity and reliability tests of the  
instrument were conducted using the SPSS  
version 16 program. Validity tests were  
conducted  
using  
the  
product  
moment  
correlation formula, while reliability tests used  
the Cronbach Alpha method. The results of the  
validity test showed that 21 items in the self-  
efficacy questionnaire and 21 items in the  
learning independence questionnaire were  
declared valid. The results of the reliability test  
showed that the Cronbach`s alpha value of self-  
efficacy was 0.851 and learning independence  
was 0.816 so it can be concluded that the  
research instrument used is reliable and can be  
used in research  
Material and Methods  
Materials and Instrumentation  
Results and Discussions  
The type of research used is survey research  
using descriptive methods with a quantitative  
approach. Data acquisition is done by answering  
a series of questions designed in a questionnaire  
then filled in by all predetermined samples. The  
source of the data population is 168 students  
divided into 5 classes, with the number of  
samples used in the study as many as 119  
students of 10th grade of Public High School 15  
Pekanbaru. In this study, two research variables  
were used, namely two independent variables  
The results of the descriptive statistical analysis  
including the average value (mean) and standard  
deviation based on student respondents are  
presented in Table 1. Table 1 shows that the level  
of self-efficacy and learning independence of 10th  
grade students of Public High School 15  
Pekanbaru tends to be in the high category, while  
chemistry learning achievement tends to be in  
the good category.  
Table 1. Descriptive Analysis Results  
N
Mean  
60.17  
62.04  
78.84  
Category  
High  
High  
Good  
SD  
Self-efficacy  
Learning independence  
Learning achievement  
119  
119  
119  
7.398  
6.442  
8.219  
Table 2. Normality and Homogenity  
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test  
Self-efficacy  
Learning Independence  
Learning achievement  
N
119  
119  
119  
Asymp. Sig (2-tailed)  
.629  
.442  
.064  
44  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Classic  
Assumption  
Test:  
The  
classical  
Analysis of the influence of self-efficacy on  
learning achievement  
assumption test in this study is include  
Normallity and Homogenity test. Table 2 shows  
that the Asymp. Sig (2-tailed) value > 0.05, which  
means that each research variable is normally  
distributed.  
Before conducting a regression test to determine  
the effect of self-efficacy on chemistry learning  
achievement, a linearity test needs to be  
conducted. The results of the linearity test  
obtained a significance value of deviation from  
linearity of 0.067> 0.05. It can be concluded that  
there is a linear relationship between the self-  
efficacy variable and the chemistry learning  
achievement variable.  
Multicollinearity test: In Table 3, it can be seen  
that the independent variables (self-efficacy and  
learning independence) have the same results,  
namely a tolerance value of 0.608 > 0.10 and a VIF  
value of 1.646 < 10, which can be concluded that  
the data is free from multicollinearity.  
Furthermore, a regression test of self-efficacy on  
student learning achievement was conducted on  
chemistry learning achievement, the results are  
presented in Table 5.  
Table 3. Multicollinearity  
Coefficients  
Model  
Collinearity Statistics  
Table 5 shows that the constant value (α) is  
50.718, meaning that if self-efficacy is equal to  
zero, then the students' chemistry learning  
achievement is 50.718. The regression coefficient  
value (b) is 0.466 and has a positive sign, meaning  
that for every 1 unit increase in self-efficacy,  
there is an increase in chemistry learning  
achievement of 0.466. So that the regression  
equation becomes Y = 50.718 + 0.466X1.  
Tolerance  
VIF  
1
Self-efficacy  
Learning  
independence  
0.608  
0.608  
1.646  
1.646  
Hypothesis testing  
Analysis of sex differences: Differential tests  
were conducted on the sex of students which  
were related to self-efficacy and learning  
independence based on student responses  
presented in Table 4. Table 4 shows that the  
significance value of the variables self-efficacy,  
The significance value obtained is 0.000 < 0.05  
with a t count value of 5.071 which means it is  
greater than t table of 1.657. So, it can be  
concluded that the self-efficacy variable has a  
learning  
independence,  
and  
learning  
significant  
effect  
on  
chemistry  
learning  
achievement is > 0.05, which indicates that there  
is no significant difference based on the sex  
demographics.  
achievement.  
Table 4. Independent Sample Test Results  
Variable  
Sex  
N
Mean  
Std.  
Deviation  
F
T
Df  
Sig. (2-  
tailed)  
Self-efficacy  
Male  
Female  
Male  
45  
74  
45  
74  
45  
74  
59.33  
60.68  
61.53  
62.35  
77.51  
79.54  
7.845  
7.120  
6.384  
6.501  
8.075  
8.116  
0.607  
0.221  
0.148  
-0.959  
-0.670  
-1.325  
117  
117  
117  
0.339  
0.504  
0.188  
Learning  
Independence  
Female  
Male  
Learning  
Achievement  
Female  
45  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Table 5. Partial Test Results of Self-Efficacy on Learning Achievement  
Unstandardized  
Coefficients  
Model  
B
t
Sig.  
1
(Constant)  
Self-efficacy  
50.718  
.466  
9.100  
5.071  
.000  
.000  
Analysis  
of  
the  
influence  
of  
learning  
that there is a linear relationship between the  
independence on learning achievement: In  
conducting a regression test, a linearity test must  
be conducted first to determine whether the  
learning independence variable has a linear  
learning  
chemistry  
independence  
learning achievement  
variable  
and  
variable.  
the  
Furthermore, a regression test of learning  
independence and chemistry learning  
relationship  
with  
the  
chemistry  
learning  
achievement was conducted. The results of the  
simple linear regression test are presented in  
Table 6.  
achievement variable. The results of the linearity  
test obtained a significance deviation from  
linearity value of 0.562> 0.05. It can be concluded  
Table 6. Partial Test Results of Learning Independence on Chemistry Learning Achievement  
Unstandardized  
Coefficients  
Model  
B
t
Sig.  
1
(Constant)  
Learning independence  
52.089  
.430  
7.617  
3.923  
.000  
.000  
Table 6 shows that the constant value (α) is  
52.089, meaning that if learning independence is  
equal to zero, then the students' chemistry  
learning achievement is 52.089. The regression  
coefficient value (b) is 0.430 and has a positive  
sign, meaning that for every 1 unit increase in  
learning independence, there is an increase in  
chemistry learning achievement of 0.430. so that  
the regression equation becomes Y = 52.089 +  
0.430X2. The significance value obtained is 0.000  
< 0.05 with a t count value of 3.923 which means  
it is greater than the t table of 1.657. The result  
shown that, the learning independence variable  
has a significant effect on chemistry learning  
achievement.  
Analysis of the influence of self-efficacy and  
learning  
independence  
simultaneously  
on  
learning achievement  
Multiple Linear Regression Test: In order to  
determine the magnitude of the influence of self-  
efficacy (X1) and learning independence (X2) on  
chemistry learning achievement (Y) using  
multiple linear regression analysis. The results of  
the analysis are presented in Table 7.  
Table 7. Multiple Linear Regression Analysis Results  
Coefficients  
Unstandardized  
Coefficients  
Standardized  
Coefficients  
Beta  
T
Sig.  
Model  
1
B
Std. Error  
(constant)  
Self-efficacy  
Learning  
46.167  
.381  
6.827  
.118  
.135  
6.762  
3.237  
1.151  
.000  
.002  
.252  
.347  
.123  
.156  
independence  
46  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Table 7 shows that the constant value (α) is  
46.167, meaning that if self-efficacy and learning  
independence in the research object are equal to  
zero (0), then the learning achievement (Y) of  
students is 46.167. The regression coefficient  
value (b1) is 0.381 which is positive, meaning that  
there is a positive influence between self-efficacy  
(X1) and learning achievement (Y). This means  
that the higher the self-efficacy value, the higher  
the learning achievement obtained. While the  
regression coefficient value (b2) is 0.156 which is  
table using a significance level of 5% with df1  
(number of variables) = k-1 = 3-1 = 2, and df2 = n-  
k-1 = 119-2-1 = 116, so that the Ftable value is 3.07.  
Therefore, the Fcount value (13.557) > Ftable (3.07)  
and it can be concluded that self-efficacy and  
learning independence have a simultaneous  
effect on chemistry learning achievement.  
Table 8. F Test  
ANOVA  
F
Sig  
positive, meaning that there is  
a
positive  
influence between learning independence (X2)  
and learning achievement (Y). So that if the  
learning independence value is higher, the  
learning achievement will also be higher. So that  
the regression equation can be seen as follows:  
푌 = 46,167 + 0,381푋1 + 0,156푋2 ......................... (1)  
13.557  
.000  
Coefficient of Determination: The coefficient of  
determination test is used to measure how much  
a model is able to explain the variation of the  
dependent variable. The results of the calculation  
of the coefficient of determination can be seen in  
Table 9.  
Simultaneous Test (F Test): The F test was  
conducted to determine whether the self-efficacy  
variable (X1) and the learning independence  
variable (X2) simultaneously influence students'  
learning achievement (Y). The results of the F test  
are presented in Table 8.  
Table  
9
shows  
that  
the  
coefficient  
of  
determination (R square) value is 0.189, which  
means  
independence  
contribute  
that  
self-efficacy  
as independent  
together to student  
in chemistry  
and  
learning  
variables  
learning  
Table 8 shows that the significance value of 0.000  
< 0.05 means that there is a significant influence  
on self-efficacy and learning independence  
achievement  
learning.  
The  
coefficient of determination (R2) value is 0.189 or  
18.9%, which means that the influence of self-  
efficacy and learning independence on learning  
achievement is 18.9 %, while the rest is  
influenced by other factors.  
simultaneously  
on  
chemistry  
learning  
achievement. The Fcount value obtained was  
13.557 which was compared to the Ftable value.  
The Ftable value can be found in the statistical  
Table 9. Results of Determination Coefficient Test  
Model Summary  
R
R Square  
.189  
.180  
Self-efficacy and learning independence  
Self-efficacy  
Learning independence  
.435  
.424  
.341  
.116  
The coefficient of determination of the self-  
The study was conducted to determine the effect  
of self-efficacy and learning independence on  
chemistry learning achievement of 10th grade at  
Public High School 15 Pekanbaru. There are three  
variables in this study, namely self-efficacy and  
learning independence as independent variables  
efficacy  
variable  
on  
chemistry  
learning  
achievement is 0.180. So that the self-efficacy  
variable contributes 18.0 % to chemistry learning  
achievement.  
The  
learning  
independence  
variable obtains a coefficient of determination of  
0.116, which means that learning independence  
and  
learning  
achievement  
as  
dependent  
contributes  
achievement in chemistry learning.  
11.6  
%
to  
student  
learning  
variables. The sample in the study was 119  
students divided into 5 classes. Based on student  
47  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
demographics, 37.8% were male and 62.2% were  
female, so there were more female students.  
a determination coefficient value of 0.180 or  
18.0%. The influence of good self-efficacy can  
produce learning achievement in chemistry  
learning that is categorized as moderate.  
Therefore, students continue to strive to produce  
satisfactory learning achievement. Students who  
have a moderate level of self-efficacy but some  
students have persistence in carrying out  
learning so that they do not give up easily and  
continue to try in carrying out academic activities  
[13]. Based on the research results that self-  
efficacy is a self-confidence in individuals to  
complete tasks and be able to overcome the  
obstacles they face. High self-efficacy will help  
students in following the learning process  
because they are able to face problems with self-  
confidence. Therefore, high self-efficacy affects  
students' learning achievement which is also  
good, and vice versa if students' self-efficacy is  
low then it will affect the learning achievement  
The results of the hypothesis testing on the self-  
efficacy variable showed no difference because it  
obtained a significance value of 0.339 > 0.05  
based on sex. The proposed hypothesis was  
rejected, because there was no difference in the  
self-efficacy variable. In line with the research  
conducted by Safitri, it showed that there was no  
significant difference by obtaining a t-test value  
of 0.167 > 0.05. This means that sex does not  
have a major effect on self-efficacy in this  
study[10]. The research results (Table 5) show that  
females' self-efficacy is higher than males’.  
The results of the hypothesis test of the learning  
independence variable showed no difference  
because it obtained a significance value of 0.504  
> 0.05 based on sex. The proposed hypothesis  
was rejected, because male and female students  
did not differ in the learning independence  
variable. In line with research conducted by  
Fauzan, it showed that there was no difference  
between male and female students in online  
learning by obtaining a significance value of 0.162  
> 0.05. This shows that there is no difference in  
independence between males and females[11].  
The research results (Table 4) show that learning  
independence in female students is higher than  
in male students.  
produced to become low [14]  
.
Testing the partial analysis results of the learning  
independence variable obtained that tcount value  
(3.923) > ttable (1.657) with a significance value of  
0.000 < 0.05, so the proposed hypothesis is  
accepted.  
independence  
This  
means  
that  
learning  
learning  
partially  
influences  
achievement in chemistry learning with  
a
determination coefficient value of 0.116 or  
11.6%. In line with research conducted by  
Widianti, it states that there is an influence  
between learning independence and learning  
The  
achievement  
results  
of  
the  
chemistry  
test  
learning  
no  
hypothesis  
showed  
achievement in Indonesian language subjects [15]  
.
difference with a significance value of 0.188 >  
0.05 based on sex. The proposed hypothesis is  
accepted because there is no difference in the  
learning achievement variable based on sex. In  
line with research conducted by Sari, it shows no  
significant difference in the learning outcomes of  
male and female students. Where they have an  
average of good learning outcomes or are  
The same results were also obtained by Wirayat,  
namely the influence of learning independence  
on learning outcomes with a determination  
coefficient of 0.102 with an influence of 10.2% [16]  
.
Based on the results of the research conducted,  
independent learning has a great influence on  
students' learning achievements, because it can  
be used to develop themselves to appear  
equivalent  
to  
achieving  
the  
minimum  
[17]  
independently without the help of others  
.
completeness criteria that have been set [12]  
.
Learning independence must also continue to be  
developed because the influence obtained is still  
in the moderate category, so that if the influence  
of learning independence increases, it can  
improve the learning achievements obtained by  
students during chemistry learning.  
Partial analysis results testing on the self-efficacy  
variable obtained that tcount value (5.071) > ttable  
(1.657) with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05,  
so the proposed hypothesis is accepted. This  
means that self-efficacy partially influences  
learning achievement in chemistry learning with  
48  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Simultaneous testing on the variables of self-  
efficacy and learning independence showed a  
positive and significant influence as seen through  
the Fcount value (13.557) > Ftable (3.07) with a  
significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, so the  
proposed hypothesis is accepted. This means  
that self-efficacy and learning independence  
simultaneously influence chemistry learning  
achievement with a determination coefficient  
value of 0.189 or 18.9%. The regression equation  
obtained is = ퟒퟔ, ퟏퟔퟕ + , ퟑퟖퟏ푿1 + , ퟏퟓퟔ푿2.  
Based on the resulting regression equation, the  
self-efficacy regression coefficient is 0.381 and  
the learning independence regression coefficient  
is 0.156. This means that the self-efficacy variable  
has a more dominant influence than learning  
independence on student learning achievement.  
The results of the study were strengthened by  
Rachman's research where there was a positive  
and significant influence on chemistry learning  
achievement as evidenced by a significance value  
of 0.000. In addition to being partial, self-efficacy  
and learning independence can influence  
together as evidenced by a significance value of  
0.000 and have a contribution of 18.9% which is  
influenced by the variables of self-efficacy and  
learning independence, and the rest is influenced  
by other factors that can improve learning  
achievement  
Acknowledgement  
This research was supported by Faculty of  
Teacher Training and Education, Chemical  
Education, Universitas Riau.  
Author Contibutions  
Conceptualization, A.R.P, L.A.; Methodology,  
A.R.P, L.A; Validation, L.A, R.R; Formal Analysis,  
A.R.P, L.A; Investigation, R.R; Data Curation, A.R.P,  
L.A, Y.N; WritingOriginal Draft Preparation,  
A.R.P; Writing Review & Editing, L.A, Y.N;  
Visualization, A.R.P; Supervision, L.A  
and  
variables  
significant  
of  
relationship  
self-efficacy  
between  
and learning  
the  
independence together with learning outcomes  
in biology subjects. The amount of contribution  
given by self-efficacy and learning independence  
to learning outcomes was 23.9% [18]  
.
Conflict of Interest  
There are no significant conflicts  
References  
With the existence of self-efficacy and learning  
independence, it is very influential in improving  
students' chemistry learning achievement in  
chemistry learning [19,20]. In addition, it is an  
encouragement for teachers to continue to  
1.  
Safri, H. Ali, and K. I. Rosadi, “Literatur Review  
Keberhasilan Pendidikan: Berfikir Sistem,  
Potensi Eksternal dan Kurikulum,” J. Ekon.  
Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 497504, 2022.  
S. Baro`ah, “Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Sebagai  
Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan,” J.  
tawadhu, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10631073, 2020.  
improve  
self-efficacy  
by  
honing  
their  
independence in the teaching and learning  
process. So that students are more courageous  
in speaking in class with various other actions to  
2.  
3.  
foster  
self-efficacy  
and  
independence  
in  
N.  
Agustyaningrum  
and  
S.  
Suryantini,  
themselves  
“Hubungan Kebiasaan Belajar dan Kepercayaan  
Diri Dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa  
Kelas VIII SMPN 27 Batam,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat.,  
vol. 1, no. 2, 2016.  
Conclusions  
Self-efficacy in the form of students' self-  
confidence is able to improve learning  
4.  
N.  
Mukasari,  
“Upaya  
Meningkatkan  
Pemahaman Kimia Materi Hidrokarbon Melalui  
Model Discovey Learning Peserta Didik Kelas XI  
MIPA 6 SMA Negeri 2 Kuta,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat.  
dan IPA, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3541, 2023.  
A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.  
New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1997.  
Minarti, “Efikasi Diri Guru (Studi di Kabupaten  
Sidenreng Rappang - Sulawesi Selatan),” Poros  
Onim J. Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–  
130, 2020.  
achievement by continuing to be trained and  
developed within themselves, and self-efficacy  
can provide a positive and significant influence  
on chemistry learning achievement as evidenced  
by a significance value of 0.000. Student learning  
independence is carried out with the aim that  
students are able to carry out learning activities  
independently without relying on others, where  
learning independence can provide a positive  
5.  
6.  
7.  
S. Nurfadilah and D. L. Hakim, “Kemandirian  
49  
Chempublish Journal, 8(1) 2024, 43-51  
Belajar Siswa Dalam Proses Pembelajaran  
Matematika,” Pros. Sesiomadika, vol. 2, no. 1e,  
pp. 12141223, 2019.  
S. Aisah, D. Kurniasih, and Fitriani, “Analisis  
Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran  
Kimia di Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Sintang,” Ar-Razi J.  
Ilm., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 7686, 2018.  
W. O. C. Chairunnisa, Murtihapsari, and C. N.  
Larasati, “Efikasi Diri dan Kemandirian Belajar  
Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Peserta Didik di  
SMA,” J. Pendidik. Kim. Undiksha, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.  
7582, 2021.  
I. Safitri, B. Yolida, and A. Surbakti, “Hubungan  
Self-Efficacy Berdasarkan Gender Dengan Hasil  
Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran IPA,” J. Bioterdidik,  
vol. 7, no. 3, 2019.  
F. Fauzan, M. Fathurrohman, and Syamsuri,  
“Perbedaan Persepsi dan Kemandirian Belajar  
Siswa SMA Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring  
Ditinjau dari Gender,” J. Penelit. dan Pengajaran  
Mat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136151, 2020.  
D. P. Sari, N. I. Meifiani, and Suryatin, “Pengaruh  
Gender terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V Mi  
Al-Huda Ploso Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020,”  
STKIP PGRI Pacitan, pp. 17, 2020.  
D. K. Pramesta and D. K. Dewi, “Hubungan  
Antara Efikasi Diri dengan Stres Akademik pada  
Siswa di SMA X,” Character J. Penelit. Psikol., vol.  
8, no. 7, 2021.  
15.  
M. Widianti, M. Nursolihah, and Nasaruddin,  
“Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar terhadap  
Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa  
Kelas XI SMA di Kota Depok Jawa Barat,” Literasi,  
J. Ilm. Pend. Bahasa, Sastra Indones. dan Drh., vol.  
10, no. 1, pp. 4253, 2020.  
A. Wirayat, J. H. Matsum, and Okianna,  
“Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil  
Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi di  
SMA,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa,  
vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 112, 2015.  
8.  
9.  
16.  
17.  
18.  
19.  
S.  
Julaecha  
and  
A.  
Baist,  
“Hubungan  
10.  
11.  
Kemandirian Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa  
SMK Kelas XII pada Pelajaran Matematika,” J.  
Anal., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103108, 2019, doi:  
10.15575/ja.v5i2.4752.  
S. A. Rachman, R. F. Mustofa, and D. Diella,  
“Hubungan Self-efficacy dan Kemandirian  
Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada  
Materi Sel,” Bio-Edu J. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 7, no. 1,  
pp. 5160, 2022.  
A. Kurniawati, P. Pardjono, F. Mutohhari, S.  
Nurhaji, S. Purnomo. Improving Self Efficacy  
and Learning Motivation Through Hybrid  
Learning Based Google Classroom, Jurnal  
Pendidikan Indonesia., Vol.11, No.3, pp. 501-521,  
2022.  
12.  
13.  
14.  
20.  
F. Solikhin, A. Wijanarko. Profile of Students'  
Self-Efficacy in Using Chemdroid Media in  
S. U. Nurhasanah, “Pengaruh Efikasi Diri dan  
Sarana Prasarana terhadap Hasil Belajar pada  
Siswa SMK Negeri 44 Jakarta.,” Universitas  
Negeri Jakarta, 2018.  
Thermochemistry  
Educational Chemistry., Vol.2, No.2, pp. 135-142,  
2021.  
Learning,  
Journal  
of  
50