Constructing the Concept of Geometric Transformation through APOS Theory: A Perspective on Learning Readiness

Nur Fauziyah; Elsa Nur Wahyunita

doi:10.22437/edumatica.v15i2.43166

Authors

Nur Fauziyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
Elsa Nur Wahyunita Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v15i2.43166

Keywords:

APOS theory, concept construction, geometric transformation, learning readiness

Abstract

Concept construction is essential for developing mathematical abilities such as conceptual understanding and problem-solving. The APOS theory (Action, Process, Object, Scheme) offers a framework for conceptual development through mental activity sequences. A key factor influencing concept construction is students’ learning readiness, which is strongly tied to their initial abilities. This study investigates the relationship between learning readiness and concept construction, as well as describes students’ concept construction profiles based on APOS theory. Employing a mixed-method approach with an explanatory sequential design, the study involved 34 eleventh-grade students from a public high school in Gresik. Data collection techniques included cognitive diagnostic assessments, written tests, think-aloud protocols, interviews, and classroom observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using regression and correlation analyses, while qualitative data were processed through reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. Findings revealed a very strong, positive correlation (r=0.9046) between learning readiness and concept construction, suggesting that higher readiness aligns with more complex conceptual structures. Additionally, three profiles emerged: students with advanced readiness displayed complete analytical constructions; those developing readiness showed pseudo-complete constructions; and newly developing students exhibited incomplete geometric constructions. Future studies should explore APOS-based instructional models tailored to readiness levels and validate findings across broader mathematical topics and grade levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggraini, D., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Construction of the Mathematical Concept of Pseudo Thinking Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1022/1/012010

Anwar, & Rofiki, I. (2018). Investigating Students’ Learning Trajectory: A Case of Triangle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012021.

Arnawa, I. M., Yerizon, Y., & Nita, S. (2019). Improvement Students’ Level of Proof Ability in Abstract Algebra Trough APOS Theory Approach. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(7), 128–131.

Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS Theory: A Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Mathematics Education. Springer.

Bansilal, S., Brijlall, D., & Trigueros, M. (2017). An APOS Study on Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Injections and Surjections. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.002

Borji, V., Martínez-Planell, R., & Trigueros, M. (2024). Students’ Geometric Understanding of Partial Derivatives and the Locally Linear Approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10242-z

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5 th). Sage Publications.

Díaz-Berrios, T., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2022). High School Student Understanding of Exponential and Logarithmic Functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100953

Ed Dubinsky, M. A. M. (2017). APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1–22.

Fauziyah, N., & Husniati, A. (2023). Learning Trajectory in Problem-Based Mathematics Learning with Literacy and Numeracy Reinforcement: An Implementation of Lesson Study at Junior High School. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i2.12883

Fuentealba, C., Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Badillo, E., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Thematization of Derivative Schema in University Students: Nuances in Constructing Relations Between a Function’s Successive Derivatives. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1248508

Gustavo, D., Delgado, L., Gustavo, D., & Delgado, L. (2019). Permanent Application of Diagnostic Assessment on Learning Teaching Process. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(4), 34–45.

Haj-Yahya, A., Hershkowitz, R., & Dreyfus, T. (2016). Impacts of Students’Difficulties in Constructing Geometric Concepts on Their Proof’S Understanding and Proving processes. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4(October 2017).

Harel, G. (2019). Varieties in the Use of Geometry in the Teaching of Linear Algebra. ZDM, 51(7), 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01015-7

Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Brown, M., & Martin, D. (2024). Low-Attaining Secondary School Mathematics Students’ Perspectives on Recommended Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10420-8

Imamuddin, M., Isnaniah, I., Rusdi, R., & Pedinal, P. (2019). Gender Based Perception on Understanding Mathematics Concept by Using PBL. HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies, 3(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v3i1.1061

Ismail, R., Abrar, A. I. P., Nur, F., Suharti, S., & Halimah, A. (2021). Development of Contextual-Based Mathematics Learning Tools on the Subject of Comparison. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(01). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i01.12045

Lima, P. D. S. N., Silva, L. D. A., Felix, I. M., & Brandao, L. D. O. (2019). Difficulties in Basic Concepts of Mathematics in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2019-October. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028658

Lin, S.-Y., Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2013). Student Difficulties in Translating Between Mathematical and Graphical Representations in Introductory Physics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789699

López, J., Robles, I., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2016). Students’ understanding of Quadratic Equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1119895

Martínez-Planell, R., & Trigueros, M. (2019). Using Cycles of Research in APOS: The Case of Functions of Two Variables. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.003

Martinez, I. G.-, & Parraguez, M. (2017). The Basis Step in the Construction of the Principle of Mathematical Induction Based on APOS Theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 128-143.

Mayorova, V. I., Grishko, D. A., & Leonov, V. V. (2021). “Vivid Mathematics” as a General Vector of Multidisciplinary STEM Education for Future Aerospace Engineers. Acta Astronautica, 178, 72–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.09.003

Mudrikah, A. (2015). Problem-Based Learning Associated by Action-Process-Object-Schema (APOS) Theory to Enhance Students’ High Order Mathematical Thinking Ability. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.88952

Mulyono, D., Asmawi, M., & Nuriah, T. (2018). The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching , Student Facilitator and Explaining and Learning Independence on Mathematical Learning Results by Controlling the Initial Ability of Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 199–205.

Nagle, C., Martínez-planell, R., & Moore-russo, D. (2019). Using APOS theory as a framework for considering slope understanding. August 2018.

Ng, C. L., & Chew, C. M. (2023). Uncovering Student Errors in Measures of Dispersion: An APOS Theory Analysis in High School Statistics Education. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13260

Nga, N. T., Dung, T. M., Trung, L. T. B. T., Nguyen, T. T., Tong, D. H., Van, T. Q., & Uyen, B. P. (2023). The Effectiveness of Teaching Derivatives in Vietnamese High Schools Using APOS Theory and ACE Learning Cycle. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.507

Noviyla, D., Syaiful, S., & Maison, M. (2023). Analisis Rekonstruksi Konsep Siswa pada Soal Bangun Datar Segiempat dan Segitiga Ditinjau dari Teori APOS. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2675–2687. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2631

Oktaç, A., Trigueros, M., & Vázqueq, A. R. (2019). APOS Theory: Connecting Research and Teaching. In For the Learning of Mathematics (Vol. 39, Issue 1, pp. 33–37).

Pramesti, C., & Prasetya, A. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Mathematics Learning Difficulty Levels in Using Mathematical Principles. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(02).

Rofiki, I., Anam, A. C., Sari, P. E., Irawan, W. H., & Santia, I. (2020). Students’ Mental Construction in Cube and Cuboid Concepts Based on Mathematical Ability Differences. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i1.5946

Rosyidi, A. H., & Hasanah, K. (2022). The Construction Process of New Concept based on APOS Theory: Male vs Female in Direct Proportion. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 3360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5706

Salgado, H., & Trigueros, M. (2015). Teaching Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Using Models and APOS Theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.06.005

Scheiner, T., & Pinto, M. M. F. (2014). Cognitive Processes Underlying Mathematical Concept Construction: the Missing Process of Structural Abstraction. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA, 5(1982).

Simanjuntak, M. B., Suseno, M., Setiadi, S., Lustyantie, N., & Barus, I. R. G. R. G. (2022). Integration of Curricula (Curriculum 2013 and Cambridge Curriculum for Junior High School Level in Three Subjects) in Pandemic Situation. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 8(1), 77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v8i1.615

Suriyah, P., Waluya, B., Dwijanto, & Rosyida, I. (2022). Construction Of Mathematics Problem-Based On APOS Theory To Encourage Reflective Abstraction Viewed From Students’ Creative Thinking Profile. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(9).

Tsafe, A. K. (2024). Effective Mathematics Learning Through APOS Theory by Dint of Cognitive Abilities. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2), em058. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14308

Turmuzi, M., Wahidaturrahmi, W., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability on Geometry Material. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(01), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i01.12394

Uegatani, Y., Otani, H., Shirakawa, S., & Ito, R. (2024). Real and Illusionary Difficulties in Conceptual Learning in Mathematics: Comparison Between Constructivist and Inferentialist Perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(4), 895–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00478-6

Ulum, M., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Learning Styles Against Students Understanding Mathematical Concepts. Edumatica, 10(September).