Teaching Service Quality in Special Education Schools: A Descriptive Study of Teachers without Special Education Qualifications
Keywords:
Quality of Teaching Services, Educational Qualifications, Special EducationAbstract
This study aims to determine how the quality of teaching services of Special School (SLB) teachers is in designing learning for students. The study was motivated by the fact that many teachers still teach outside their area of expertise, particularly in Special Education Schools. The research method used in this study is qualitative research, employing in-depth interview techniques with research subjects. The research subjects were special school teachers at SLB Bina Bakti, South Jakarta, with data collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and documentation. Data validity was ensured using source triangulation and method/technique triangulation. Data analysis employed an interactive model consisting of data collection, data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results of this study indicate that the quality of teaching services of teachers at SLB Bina Bakti remains low due to the high number of teachers with non-special education qualifications at the school. This situation affects several aspects: 1) In lesson planning for students with emotional and behavioral disorders, teachers are still lacking in preparation and determining the appropriate models and methods. This is because teachers continue to use lesson plans that do not align with the standards for teaching students with special needs established by the school itself. 2) In the implementation of learning, teachers are still lacking in providing appropriate learning treatments for students with special needs, such as adapting materials, using varied methods, utilizing adequate media, and maintaining conducive classroom management. 3) Evaluation is relatively effective, often using written tests adjusted to the students needs and guided by teachers in completing the questions or evaluation tests according to the students conditions. Thus, teachers face numerous challenges in teaching students with special needs.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, S. (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Chomaidi, & Salamah. (2018). Pendidikan dan Pengajaran: Strategi Pembelajaran Sekolah. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Djamarah, Syaeful Bahri.(2005).Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Anak Didik : Rineka Cipta Jakarta
Fasli, J. (2010). Reformasi Pendidikan Dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusantara.
Febrianti, E. (2017). Deskripsi Kompetensi Pedagogik dan Profesional Guru yang Berlatar Belakang Pendidikan Non PLB (Studi Kasus di SDLB Maarif Kowen, Timbulharjo, Sewon, Bantul). Jurnal Al Tanzim, 88-94.
Haikal, R. M., & Darmiani, H. (2022). Problematika Guru dalam Mengajar Peserta Didik Berkebutuhan Khusus di SLB Azahra. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 643-648.
Hastuti, M. B. (2017). Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Non PLB di SLB Negeri Pembina Jakarta. Al Tanzim, 43-47.
Hernawaty , S. (2006). What Makes Effective Teaching in the 21st Century. 1st English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC), 145-151.
Huberman, A.M, M. H., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi. Universitas Indonesia Press, 128-134.
Komang, A. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Mangkunegara , A. P. (2015). Kecerdasan Emosi, Stres Kerja dan Kinerja Guru SLB. Jurnal Kependidikan : Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, Volume 45, Nomor 02, 142-155.
Nurmawanti, I., Haryati, L. F., Radiusman, Anar, A. P., & Novitasari, S. (2020). Problematika dan Tindakan Guru Dalam Menghadapi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di MI NW T anak Beak. Jurnal Progres Pendidikan, 1(2), 72–79.
Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud. (2019). Laporan Nasional 2018 Indonesia. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.
Rahayuni,W.(2017).Kemampuan guru kelas dalam mengajar Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus berkesulitan belajar pada Program Inklusi.Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan Dasar.9(2), 81–88.
Sakir, M. (2012). Konsep Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan Berbasis Madrasah. Cendekia Vol.10 No.1, 64-67.
Scachter, J. (2009). Teacher Performance-Based Accountability:Why, What and How. Journal International, 354-362.
Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sundayana, R. (2013). Media Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriono, A. (2017). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik, Profesional, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan, Volume 18, Nomor 2 September, 1-12.
Suryobroto, B. (2010). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Syahabuddin. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Pengembangan Materi Bahan Ajar Melalui Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah Di SLB Negeri Taliwang Kab. Sumbawa Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2018-2019. JURNAL KEPENDIDIKAN,Vol 6, No 1, Agustus, 65-76.
Tentawa, F. (2016). The Roles Of Teachers’ Work Motivation And Teachers’ Job Satisfaction In The Organizational Commitment In Extraordinary Schools. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) ,Vol.5, No.1, March, 39-45.
Yulianti Wulan, Yunia Anita, Setyaningtyas Emilya, Aprida Sihombing.(2025) Penguatan Kompetensi Komunikasi Public Speaking dan Negosiasi Rumah Autis . Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia,Vol.5,No 1, 369-370.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Isti Haryani; Irwan Hermawan, Drinka Radisic

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







