Morphological Error in Students’ Recount Text

Authors

  • Ghustiva Liani Politeknik Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/kalistra.v4i3.52059

Keywords:

morphology, error, recount text

Abstract

The objective of this research was to know, describe and interpret the morphological error in recount text made by students of a Private Junior High School in North Jakarta. The population in this research is the students of grade VIII at the school. The method used in this study is descriptive analysis method to describe students’ errors consisting of 28 erroneous sentences and analyze the data taken from written test. The classification of errors in this research is divided into four categories; they are omission, addition, misformation, and disordering. The findings showed that the number of errors in morphological level, committed by the students are in inflectional morphology as much as 22 (79%) and derivational morphology is 6 (21%). It happened because students’ lack of understanding in applying the parts of speech in the sentences, such as verb, to be, preposition, pronoun, noun, conjunction, adverb, adjective and others. Thus, students find it difficult to arrange or form one word along with its meaning.

Abstrak

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui, mendeskripsikan, dan menginterpretasikan kesalahan morfologis dalam “recount text” yang dibuat oleh para siswa di salah satu sekolah SMP swasta di Jakarta Utara. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII di sekolah tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode analisis deskriptif untuk menggambarkan kesalahan siswa yang terdiri dari 28 kalimat yang mengandung kesalahan, serta menganalisis data yang diambil dari tes tertulis. Klasifikasi kesalahan dalam penelitian ini dibagi menjadi empat kategori, yaitu penghilangan, penambahan, pembentukan yang salah, dan penyusunan yang salah. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa jumlah kesalahan pada tingkat morfologis yang dilakukan oleh para siswa di sekolah tersebut terdapat pada morfologi infleksional sebanyak 22 kesalahan (79%) dan morfologi derivasional sebanyak 6 kesalahan (21%). Hal ini terjadi karena kurangnya pemahaman siswa dalam menerapkan kelas kata (parts of speech) dalam kalimat, seperti kata kerja, kata kerja bantu (to be), preposisi, pronomina, kata benda, konjungsi, kata keterangan, kata sifat, dan lainnya. Akibatnya, siswa mengalami kesulitan dalam menyusun atau membentuk suatu kata beserta maknanya.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Algouzi, S., Alzubi, A. A. F., & Nazim, M. (2023). Strengthening English language undergraduates’ presentation skills: A blackboard-mediated intervention program. PLoS ONE, 18(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289936

Azizah, Dewita Nur. (2014). Errors in Recount Text Made by Tenth Grade Students of SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta. Skripsi: UMS.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2002) Bahasa asing sebagai bahasa pengantar dalam sistem pendidikan, bahasa dan sastra. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Dornyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59(1), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x

Fauziati, E. (2016). Reading on applied linguistics: principle of foreign language teaching, learning, and researcher. Surakarta: Era Pustaka Mandiri.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hartono, Rudi. (2005). Genre of text, Semarang: UNNES.

Jack R Fraenkel & Norman E Wallen. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th edition). Washington DC: Beth Mejia.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2003). An Introduction to language. Boston, MA: Heinle.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). How to teach writing. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Ronald, C., & Michael, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.

W.M. K. Trochim., & J.P. Donnelly. (2008). The research methods knowledge base (3rd edition). Mason: OH.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Liani, G. (2025). Morphological Error in Students’ Recount Text. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 4(3), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.22437/kalistra.v4i3.52059

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.