The Potential of ChatGPT as a Substitute for Human Teachers: Insights from Tunisian EFL Learners' Perspectives

Leila Najeh

doi:10.22437/langue.v4i1.49199

Authors

Leila Najeh Sfax University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/langue.v4i1.49199

Keywords:

artificial language model, foreign language learning, ChatGPT, linguistic capabilities, Tunisian English language learners

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about various language robots, with ChatGPT being among the most sophisticated due to its human-like linguistic capabilities and adaptability. This raises the idea of using ChatGPT in foreign language learning. Starting from the premise that positions ChatGPT as a mediator between language and learner, functioning as a “ghost teacher” offering a peaceful and secure learning space, this study explores the attitudes of Tunisian students of English towards ChatGPT as a “Foreign Language Teacher” and digital assistant. Forty-five third-year English students at Tunisian universities completed a Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of thirty-one items covering phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. A scale ranging from 'Strongly Disagree' to 'Strongly Agree' was used to assess their attitudes toward integrating ChatGPT in language learning effectively and meaningfully. Results indicate generally positive attitudes toward using ChatGPT, particularly in aspects like syntax, phonology, and morphology. However, learners show hesitation regarding its usefulness in pragmatics and semantics, where AI may struggle with deeper, context-sensitive language levels and cultural nuances. These attitudes are shaped by several factors, especially students' technological familiarity and the structure of the education system. Learners with regular exposure to digital tools and online environments tend to be more receptive to AI integration. In contrast, those from rural or under-resourced areas often express skepticism due to limited access and training. Moreover, the nature of the academic system, whether teacher–centered or learner-centered, influences perceptions of AI's usefulness in education and its potential role in personalized learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Roud, A. (2016). Problems of English speaking skill that university students encounter from their perspectives. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 18(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjesbs/2016/28404

Amalaraj, J. J. P., Saminathan, T. A., Lourdes, T. G. R., Al-Maliki, M. A. A., Aziz, M. A. F. A., Yusoff, N. A. M., & Zaki, R. A. (2023). E-learning during COVID-19 and anxiety levels among university students: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health and Emergency, 7, Article eXXXX.

Chen, Y. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on Chinese students’ foreign language anxiety in Macau’s EMI higher education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 39, 346–355.

Chomsky, N. (2014). Aspects of the theory of syntax (No. 11). MIT Press.

Chomsky, N., Roberts, I., & Watumull, J. (2023). The false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times.

Coseriu, E., & Geckeler, H. (1974). Linguistics and semantics. Current Trends in Linguistics, 12(1), 103–158.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Fang, S., & Han, Z. (2025). On the nascency of ChatGPT in foreign language teaching and learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1–31.

Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.

Kalla, D., & Smith, N. (2023). Study and analysis of ChatGPT and its impact on different fields of study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3).

Kirmani, A. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence–enabled science poetry. ACS Energy Letters, 8(1), 574–576.

Kocmi, T., & Federmann, C. (2023). GEMBA-MQM: Detecting translation quality error spans with GPT-4. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13988

Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2013). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lieber, R. (2005). English word-formation processes. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 375–427). Springer.

Łazorczyk, A., Elsman, M., Lord, C., Rochman, L., Sáez, L., Gergel, R., & Snape, N. (2009). Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and acquisition. Georgetown University Press.

Magouri, A., Alaya, N., Ben Jelili, R., & Mabkhout, A. (2018). Déséquilibres régionaux: Axes et actions prioritaires et inégalités sociales en Tunisie. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Milmo, D. (2023). ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. The Guardian.

Mofareh, A. (2019). Difficulties facing students in English language conversation. International Research in Higher Education, 4(3), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.5430/irhe.v4n3p51

Nykon, Y. (n.d.). Essentials of artificial intelligence for language learning: Apply AI in language learning and develop personalized content that accelerates your students’ progress. Intellias. Retrieved October 17, 2025, from https://intellias.com/how-ai-helps-crack-a-new-language/

Omar, R., Mangukiya, O., Kalnis, P., & Mansour, E. (2023). ChatGPT versus traditional question answering for knowledge graphs: Current status and future directions toward knowledge graph chatbots. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06466

Oranga, J. (2023). Benefits of artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) in education and learning: Is ChatGPT helpful? International Review of Practical Innovation, Technology and Green Energy, 3(3), 46–50.

Peters, O. (2002). Distance education in transition: New trends and challenges. BIS Verlag.

Phosa, S. (2024). The study of EFL students’ attitudes and behaviors toward using ChatGPT in English language learning. Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 332–344.

Raskin, V. (1987). Linguistics and natural language processing. In Machine translation: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 42–58). Cambridge University Press.

Scales, J., Wennerstrom, A., Richard, D., & Wu, S. H. (2006). Language learners’ perceptions of accent. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 715–738.

Schmidt-Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(1), 105–119.

Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press.

Wang, Y., Zhong, W., Li, L., Mi, F., Zeng, X., Huang, W., & Liu, Q. (2023). Aligning large language models with humans: A survey. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12966

Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo, and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122–1136.

Ye, Y., You, H., & Du, J. (2023). Improved trust in human–robot collaboration with ChatGPT. IEEE Access.