DEVELOPMENT OF GAS KINETIC THEORY LEARNING TOOLS: 5E & BRICK MAKING FOR COMPUTATIONAL THINKING

Authors

  • Ayu Mar'ati Barokatun Ni'mah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Jumadi Jumadi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Reny Afifah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Supahar Supahar Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v10i2.45367

Keywords:

Computational Thinking, Learning Cycle 5E , Learning Tools

Abstract

This research aims to (1) develop feasible learning tools for the kinetic theory of gases and (2) create effective physics learning tools for students. The research employs the ADDIE model. The data analysis to evaluate the feasibility and practicality of the learning tools uses a standard scale, while the validity of the question instrument is assessed using Aiken's V and item analysis with the Partial Credit Model (PCM). To measure the effectiveness of the tools in enhancing students' computational thinking skills, a repeated-measures MANOVA is conducted using the General Linear Model (GLM) with a significance level of 0.05. The findings indicate that (1) the developed learning tools are deemed feasible for use in improving computational thinking skills, as assessed by media experts, material experts, and practitioners. Moreover, (2) the analysis shows a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05, meaning there is a noticeable difference in computational thinking abilities between the experimental and control groups. Additionally, the effect size obtained was 0.813, which is categorized as large. These results suggest that the learning tools developed are both feasible and effective. In conclusion, this research demonstrates the potential of these tools to enhance students' computational thinking abilities in physics education, specifically in the context of the kinetic theory of gases, making them a valuable resource for future learning activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adi, N. H., Fernandes, A. L., & Hermansyah. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis android pada mata kuliah fisika dasar. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v3i1.414

Annisah, A., Hudha, A. M., Sukarsono, S., Rahardjanto, A., & Susetyarini, E. (2025). Development of student worksheets material on biodiversity of tidung tribe medicinal plants in SMA Negeri 3 Nunukan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 11(1), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i1.39530

Arafat, M. H., Budiyanto, C. W., Yuana, R. A., & Fenyvesi, K. (2024). Implementation of review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 12(5), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4271

Bonfiglio-Pavisich, N. (2018). Technology and pedagogy integration: A model for meaningful technology integration. Australian Educational Computing, 33(1). Retrieved from https://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/165

Çelik, İ. N., & Bati, K. (2025). The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Academic Performances and Computational Thinking Skills in the Computational Problem-Solving Approach. Informatics in Education, 24(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2025.01

Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7

Djadir, Upu, H., & Rezky, A. (2021). Model Pembelajaran learning cycle 5e (engage, explore, explain, elaboration, evaluate) berbasis daring dalam pembelajaran matematika. Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian 2021, 1931–1943. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnaslemlit/article/view/25459

Fayanto, S., Nyoman Sudana Degeng, I., Patmanthara, S., & Ulfa, S. (2024). Instructional process of design-based learning integration on computational thinking: a framework for effective teaching in course of physics experiment design. Science Education International, 35(4), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i4.10

Fitria, D., Asrizal, A., Dhanil, M., & Lufri, L. (2024). Impact of blended problem-based learning on students’ 21st century skills on science learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(4), 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4080

Guggemos, J. (2023). On the predictors of computational thinking self-efficacy. 20th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2023, Celda, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2023_202306l007

Gunawan, Ferdianto, F., Ulia, N., Akhsani, L., Untarti, R., & Istiqomah. (2025). The profile of students’ mathematical computational thinking process in terms of self-efficacy. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 17(1), 213–231. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1470642

Guven, U. (2009). The influence of the Hosford exponent on the critical major strain of a sheet metal. In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223(4). https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1403

Halimah, N., Megawati, S., Fata, A., Nordin, N. E., & Mulyanto, A. (2022). Tranformasi peran pengawas dalam upaya peningkatan mutu pendidikan sekolah: Sebuah kajian literature. Journal of Basic Educational Studies, 2(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.47467/edu.v4i3.6127

Hasballah, T. (2024). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka: tantangan, kebijakan, dan dampak terhadap pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Edukatif, 10(2), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.37567/jie.v10i2.3404

Haynes, A., Kelley, J., & Arce-Trigatti, A. (2024). Gaining ground: Toward the development of critical thinking skills in a social problems course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(01), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2024.180110

Herlina, K., Abdurrahman, A., Umam, A. N., Nurjanah, A., Rabbani, G. F., & Pratiwi, F. A. I. (2025). Expression-based e-worksheet (ebew): An effort to enhance students' computational thinking skills. Journal of Technology and Scince Education, 15(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2210

Isma, A., Isma, A., Isma, A., & Isma, A. (2023). Peta permasalahan pendidikan abad 21 di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 01(3), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v1i3.153

Karopak, J., Yunus, M., & Hamid, S. (2023). Model desain kelas & proses belajar mengajar. Makassar: Chakti Pustaka Indonesia.

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716

Kirbas, A., & Bulut, M. (2024). Examining the 21st century skills teaching levels of teacher candidates. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(3), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.800

Kumalasari, E., & Widodo, S. T. (2025). Effectiveness of problem-based learning model with canva on fourth grade students’ pancasila learning outcomes. Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 54–68. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/gentala/article/view/42344

Kusmahardhika, N., Prasetyo, T. I., & Wati, B. M. (2023). The development of learning tools based on stem-pjbl to increase cognitive learning outcomes for 10th grade students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112237

Liana, D. (2020). Penerapan pembelajaran siklus belajar (learning cycle 5e) terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas VI SDN 007 Kotabaru Kecamatan Keritang. MITRA PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 6(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v6i1.127

Lubis, S. P. W., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Paidi, & Yanto, B. E. (2022). The effectiveness of problem-based learning with local wisdom oriented to socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15225a

Lumantarna, B., Pudjisuryadi, P., Soetanto, R. M., & Hindrajaya, G. G. (2017). Local wisdom to a sustainable non-engineered brick building. Procedia Engineering, 171, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.322

Madrin, A., & Ratnawati, R. (2024). Website development on herbal plant diversity as media in kurikulum merdeka. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.29850

Milala, H. F., Endryansyah, E., Joko, J., & Agung, A. I. (2021). Keefektifan dan kepraktisan media pembelajaran menggunakan adobe flash player. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 11(02), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpte.v11n02.p195-202

Muliyati, D., Sumardani, D., Siswoyo, S., Bakri, F., Permana, H., Handoko, E., & Sari, N. L. K. (2022). Development and evaluation of granular simulation for integrating computational thinking into computational physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2585–2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10724-8

Munawarah, Thalhah, S. Z., Angriani, A. D., Nur, F., & Kusumayanti, A. (2021). Development of instrument test computational thinking skills IJHS/JHS based RME approach. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 13(4), 202–220. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1332346

Lapawi, H., & Husnin, H. (2020). The effect of computational thinking module on achievement. Science Education International, 31(2), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.5

Nuroso, H., Supriyadi, Sudarmin, S., & Sarwi. (2018). Identification of indigenous science in the brick-making process through ethnoscience study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012172

Pangsuma, N. S., Nurahman, A. A., Riandi, R., & Solihat, R. (2024). Innovation of ESD learning module (education for sustainable development) based on bugis local wisdom for critical thinking skills and environmental literacy. Jornal of Science Learning, 7(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v7i3.71247

Priyohutomo, A. (2025). Understanding and applying of physical education teachers regarding the project based learning model and 4C skills. Febrero, 63, 580–589. http://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v63.107062

Purnomo, R. (2019). Pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri dengan model the 5 E learning cycle dapat meningkatkan keaktifan belajar dan hasil belajar siswa. Belantika Pendidikan, 2(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v2i2.32

Rahmasari, A., & Kuswanto, H. (2023). The effectiveness of problem-based learning physics local wisdom of catapults in improving mathematical and. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1962

Riawan, M. R. I., Sukamto, S., & Subekti, E. E. (2020). Keefektifan Media pembelajaran buku aktivitas peta si pintar dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 4(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i2.193

Richardo, R., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., Murti, R. C., Wijaya, A., Adawiya, R., Ihwani, I. L., Ardiyaningrum, M., & Aryani, A. E. (2025). Computational thinking skills profile in solving mathematical problems based on computational thinking attitude. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(2), 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21643

Said, K. (2024). Kurikulum merdeka: Langkah menuju pendidikan yang berfokus pada kreativitas dan kemandirian di sekolaH. IBTIDA’IY: Jurnal Prodi PGMI, 9(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.31764/ibtidaiy.v9i2.27704

Sugiyanto, S., Muryani, C., & Ni’matussyahara, D. (2024). Strengthening student empathy in geocapabilities: Digital learning innovations and pedagogical strategies for disaster mitigation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14913

Uyar, A. (2023). 21st century skills of pre-service teachers and visions of faculties of education in acquiring 21st century skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1274201

Widyaningtyas, F. S., Kuswanto, H., Rahman Aththibby, A., Tesi Muskania, R., Octavia Rosa, F., Damayanti, P., & Endri Yanto, B. (2024). Creative physics problem solving based on local culture to improve creative thinking and problem-solving Skills. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(1), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.01.26

Yadav, A., & Berthelsen, U. D. (2022). Computational thinking in education: A pedagogical perspective. New York: Routledge.

Yusuf, M. (2018). Inovasi pendidikan abad-21: perspektif, tantangan, dan praktik terkini. Yogyakarta: Selat Media Patners.

Yusuf, R. R., Abdjul, T., & Payu, C. S. (2023). Validitas, kepraktisan, dan efektivitas bahan ajar berbantuan google sites pada materi getaran, gelombang dan bunyi. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 9(1), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v9i1.1115

Zainil, M., Kenedi, A. K., Rahmatina, Indrawati, T., & Handrianto, C. (2023). The influence of a STEM-based digital classroom learning model and high-order thinking skills on the 21st-century skills of elementary school students in Indonesia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4336

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Ni’mah, A. M. B., Jumadi, J., Afifah, R., & Supahar, S. (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF GAS KINETIC THEORY LEARNING TOOLS: 5E & BRICK MAKING FOR COMPUTATIONAL THINKING. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(3), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v10i2.45367