Metacognitive Strategies in Learning English:
A Think-Aloud Protocol in Completing Grammar Tasks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v9i1.44317Keywords:
Grammar task, Metacognition, Metacognitive strategies, Think-aloud protocol, EFL learnersAbstract
This study explores metacognitive strategies used by students in learning English grammar. The participants of this study were students of a private university in East Java from three different batches (2020, 2021, and 2022). There were two stages of research conducted: (1) a survey questionnaire and (2) a think-aloud protocol. The survey questionnaire was conducted for all the participants (N=30) using Google Forms. The think-aloud protocol was employed with six selected participants. In the think-aloud stage, the six participants were required to complete a grammar task in the form of sentence combining. While they were working on the task, they said aloud their thought processes. The think-aloud process while they were completing the task was observed and recorded. The questionnaire data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, and the transcribed data from the think-aloud protocol were analyzed thematically to find out the metacognitive strategies used in solving the grammar task. The results of this study indicate the usefulness of metacognitive strategies in learning grammar, especially in solving grammar tasks. The findings support previous studies that high achievers in foreign language learning tend to use various metacognitive strategies in their learning.
Downloads
References
Abbasian, G.-R., & Esmaeilifard, F. (2013). A Synthetic approach to the infusion of metacognitive strategy in teaching grammar. Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology(5), 114-122.
Abdel Latif, M. (2018). Using think-aloud protocols and interviews in investigating writers’ composing processes: combining concurrent and retrospective data. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2018.1439003
Anderson, N. J. (2012). Metacognition: Awareness of language learning. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for Language Learning: Insights from Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 169-187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829
Azizmohammadi, F., & Barjesteh, H. (2020). On the relationship between EFL learners’ grammar learning strategy use and their grammar performance: Learners’ gender in focus. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1104.08
Baker, L., & Cerro, L. C. (2000). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, (pp. 99-145). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (2002). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 229-243). Springer-Science + Business Media, B.V.
Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar Pedagogy in Second and Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL QUARTERLY, 25(3), 459-480.
Chong, S. W. (2020). Metacognitive Mindscapes: Understanding Secondary EFL Writing Students' Systems of Knowledge. Routledge.
Cross, J. (2015). Metacognition in L2 listening: Clarifying instructional theory and practice. TESOL QUARTERLY, 49(4), 883-892. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.258
Cummins, C., Stewart, M. T., & Block, C. C. (2005). Teaching several metacognitive strategies together increases students' independent metacognition. In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), (2005). Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. (pp. 277-295). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Daradoumis, T., & Arguedas, M. (2020). Cultivating students’ reflective learning in metacognitive activities through an affective pedagogical agent. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 19-31.
Dilek, B. S., & Guven, M. (2011). Meta-cognitive strategy usage and epistemological beliefs of primary school teacher trainees. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 51-57.
Dornyei, Z., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). The motivational foundation of learning languages other than global English: Theoretical issues and research directions. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 455-468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12408
Dypedahl, M. (2018). A metacognitive approach to intercultural learning in language teacher education. In Å. Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.), Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 48-66). Routledge.
Farahian, M., & Avarzamani, F. (2018). Metacognitive awareness of skilled and less-skilled EFL writers. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0052-4
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Goh, C. C. M. (2018). Metacognition in Second Language Listening. 1-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0572
Haukås, Å. (2018). Metacognition in language learning and teaching: An overview. In Å. Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.), Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 11-30). Routledge.
Haukås, Å., Bjørke, C., & Dypedahl, M. (2018). Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching. Routledge.
Holzknecht, F., & Harding, L. (2023). Repeating the listening text: Effects on listener performance, metacognitive strategy use, and anxiety. TESOL QUARTERLY. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3249
Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Facilitating L2 writers' metacognitive strategy use in argumentative writing using a process-genre approach. Front Psychol, 13, 1036831. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036831
Jones, C., & Oakey, D. (2024). Learners' perceived development of spoken grammar awareness after corpus‐informed instruction: An exploration of learner diaries. TESOL QUARTERLY, 58(3), 1138-1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3305
Knospe, Y. (2018). Metacognitive knowledge about writing in a foreign language: A case study. In Å. Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.), Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 121-156). Routledge.
Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2013). The interaction of motivation, self‐regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL QUARTERLY, 48(2), 275-299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.129
Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and Metacognitive Instruction in Second Language Writing Classrooms. TESOL QUARTERLY, 52(4), 1085-1097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.436
Murray, G., Gao, X. A., & Lamb, T. (2011). Identity Motivation and Autonomy in Second Language Learning. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Okmawati, M. (2021). The Role of Metacognitive Strategy in Learning English. Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020). ,
Oyelana, O. O., Olson, J., & Caine, V. (2022). An evolutionary concept analysis of learner-centered teaching. Nurse Educ Today, 108, 105187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105187
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73-81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019
Rahmati, T., Sadeghi, K., & Ghaderi, F. (2018). English language teachers’ vision and motivation: Possible selves and activity theory perspectives. RELC Journal, 50(3), 457-474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218777321
Ramadhanti, D., & Yanda, D. P. (2021). Students’ metacognitive awareness and its impact on writing skill. International Journal of Language Education, 5(3), 193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i3.18978
Rimun, J. C., & Yumarnamto, M. (2024). Metacognition in ELT writing: Teacher’s facilitation and students’ strategies Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 11(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v11i2.20563
River, P., & Whitehead, G. E. K. (2018). Teaching metacognitively adaptive inside-out thinking in the language classroom. In Å. Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.), Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 243-262). Routledge.
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Baffoe-Djan, J. B. (2019). Data collection research methods in applied linguistics. Bloomsbury Academic.
Ruan, Z. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863901
Sabnani, R. L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2021). Developing young learners’ metacognitive awareness for speaking. TESOL QUARTERLY, 56(1), 336-346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3042
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., & Kruk, R. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1565067. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1565067
Stephen, S. M., & Singh, X. P. (2010). Learning grammar autonomously through metacognitive strategies: An experiment. Journal of NELTA, 15(1-2), 146-150.
Sun, P. P. (2022). Strategic Self‐Regulation for Speaking English as a Foreign Language: Scale Development and Validation. TESOL QUARTERLY, 56(4), 1369-1383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3132
Svalberg, A. M. L. (2015). Understanding the complex processes in developing student teachers’ knowledge about grammar. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 529-545. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12241
Üstünbaş, Ü., & Alagözlü, N. (2021). Efficacy beliefs and metacognitive awareness in English language teaching and teacher education. BUEFAD: Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(2), 267-280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/buefad.828035
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2061683
Williams, J. P., & Atkins, J. G. (2009). The role of metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 26-43). Routledge.
Wolcott, M. D., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). Using cognitive interviews and think-aloud protocols to understand thought processes. Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 13(2), 181-188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2018). Metacognition in TESOL: Theory and Practice. In A. Shehadeh (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. (pp. 1-8). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0803
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2020). Think aloud protocols. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 302-311). Routledge.
Zhao, C. G., & Liao, L. (2021). Metacognitive strategy use in L2 writing assessment. System, 98, 102472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102472
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Language Teaching and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to International Journal of Language Teaching and Education (IJoLTe) and Magister Program of English Education Department, Universitas Jambi as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
IJoLTe keep the rights to articles that have been published. And, the authors are permitted to disseminate published article by sharing the link of IJoLTe' website. Authors are allowed to use their works for any purposes deemed necessary without written permission from IJoLTe with an acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
IJoLTe and Magister Program of English Education Department, Universitas Jambi, and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in IJoLTe are the sole and responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors who submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. IJoLTe will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. IJoLTe will only communicate with the corresponding author.
By submitting the article/manuscript to this journal, the authors agree with this policy and consciously agree that IJoLTe does not provide royalties or other fees to the authors for their published articles. By agreeing this policy, IJoLTe ensures that published articles are publicly accessible and will be free of charge for the readers. No specific document sign-off is required.
Users of this website will be licensed to use materials from this website following the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Please use the materials accordingly
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.



.png)










