Pengembangan Asesmen Formatif Berbasis Socrative untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Umpan Balik dalam Mengukur Kerja Ilmiah Siswa
(Development of Socrative-Based Formative Assessment to Improve the Effectiveness of Feedback in Measuring Students' Scientific Work)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/biodik.v12i1.51766Abstract
Formative assessment plays a crucial role in supporting process-oriented science learning, particularly in measuring and developing students' scientific work. However, assessment practices in schools still tend to focus on outcomes and minimize rapid and meaningful feedback. Therefore, the development of technology-based formative assessment is an urgent need. This study aims to develop a Socrative-based formative assessment and assess the effectiveness of its feedback in measuring students' scientific work. The study used a Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model, which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. A limited trial was conducted on high school students, collecting data in the form of a scientific work test based on science process skills and a student perception questionnaire. Data analysis was descriptive. The results showed that most students were in the medium to high scientific work category and had positive perceptions of the use of Socrative-based formative assessment. The real-time feedback was perceived as helping students understand learning outcomes and reflect on them. These findings suggest that Socrative-based formative assessment has the potential to be an alternative assessment that supports more responsive and meaningful biology learning.
Abstrak. Asesmen formatif berperan penting dalam mendukung pembelajaran sains yang berorientasi pada proses, khususnya dalam mengukur dan mengembangkan kerja ilmiah siswa. Namun, praktik asesmen di sekolah masih cenderung berfokus pada hasil akhir dan minim umpan balik yang cepat serta bermakna. Oleh karena itu, pengembangan asesmen formatif berbasis teknologi menjadi kebutuhan yang mendesak. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan asesmen formatif berbasis Socrative serta mengkaji efektivitas umpan baliknya dalam mengukur kerja ilmiah siswa. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Research and Development (R&D) dengan model ADDIE yang meliputi tahap analisis, desain, pengembangan, implementasi, dan evaluasi. Uji coba terbatas dilakukan pada siswa SMA dengan pengumpulan data berupa tes kerja ilmiah berbasis keterampilan proses sains dan angket persepsi siswa. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar siswa berada pada kategori kerja ilmiah sedang hingga tinggi, serta memiliki persepsi positif terhadap penggunaan asesmen formatif berbasis Socrative. Umpan balik yang diberikan secara real-time dipersepsikan membantu siswa memahami hasil belajar dan melakukan refleksi. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa asesmen formatif berbasis Socrative berpotensi menjadi alternatif asesmen yang mendukung pembelajaran biologi secara lebih responsif dan bermakna.
Downloads
References
Abbas, R., Sebastián, A., & Casanova, J. (2024). Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance? Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13048-5
Amaefule, E. O. (2025). Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes Through Live Marking and Socrative: A Formative Assessment Study in Secondary Science Classrooms. European Journal of Innovative Studies and Sustainability, 1(3), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejiss.2025.1(3).05
Amjad, A. I., Aslam, S., Tabassum, U., Sial, Z. A., & Shafqat, F. (2024). Digital Equity and Accessibility in Higher Education: Reaching the Unreached. European Journal of Education, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12795
Azzahra, Y., & Lubis, S. (2025). Developing Formative Assessment on Procedure Text through Socrative for Tenth Grade Students at MAN 2 Model Medan. REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 14(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v14i2.66160
Bukhori, B., & Amaliah, S. (2023). The Practice of Formative Assessment by Indonesian Vocational School’s English Teachers during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Kutubkhanah, 23(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.24014/kutubkhanah.v23i1.24857
Bulut, O., Gorgun, G., & Yildirim-Erbasli, S. N. (2025). The impact of frequency and stakes of formative assessment on student achievement in higher education: A learning analytics study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13087
Dervan, P. (2024). Increasing in-class student engagement using Socrative (an online Student Response System). The All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher, 6(2), 1977.
Gizaw, G. G., & Sota, S. S. (2023). Improving Science Process Skills of Students: A Review of Literature. Science Education International, 34(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i3.5
Goertzen, L., Heeneman, S., & Schils, T. (2025). The impact of formative assessment on pupil academic achievement: An empirical study of the effects of a formative assessment practices program that was co-designed in a teacher community. Learning and Instruction, 99(May), 102153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102153
Izmala, A., Yusuf, D., Meilisa, & Iskandar, S. (2025). PERAN GURU DALAM MENDORONG INOVASI PEMBELAJARAN DI ERA DIGITAL Athariah. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 292–302. http://search.jamas.or.jp/link/ui/2014143423
Jhuniati, N. L. P. A., Puryanti, N. W. S., & Putri, N. P. Y. S. (2024). Pengaruh Penggunaan Socrative dalam Penilaian Diagnostik terhadap Efektivitas Pengajaran: Perspektif Guru. Indonesian Journal of Instruction, 5(3), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v5i3.85958
Kaliappen, N., Ismail, W. N. A., Ghani, A. B. A., & Sulisworo, D. (2021). Wizer.Me and socrative as innovative teaching method tools: Integrating tpack and social learning theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I3.21744
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2022). Laporan survei pembelajaran digital di sekolah. Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/25293/1/Laporan%20Survei%20Pembelajaran%20Digital.pdf
Lebedeva, M., Taranova, M., & Beketov, V. (2023). Assessment of academic achievements in m-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5945–5965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11423-8
Martinez, C., Serra, R., Sundaramoorthy, P., Booij, T., Vertegaal, C., Bounik, Z., van Hastenberg, K., & Bentum, M. (2023). Content-Focused Formative Feedback Combining Achievement, Qualitative and Learning Analytics Data. Education Sciences, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101014
Nurhasanah, F., & Khasanah, N. (2020). the Effectiveness of Socrative Application for Formative Assessment in Teaching Vocabulary At Sma Muhammadiyah 1 Ponorogo. ELTALL: English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistic and Literature, 1(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v1i2.2448
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Assessing scientific literacy: PISA 2025 science framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2025-science-framework.pdf
Pai, G. (2025). Using Formative Assessment and Feedback from Student Response Systems (SRS) to Revise Statistics Instruction and Promote Student Growth for All. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 33(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2024.2321241
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2020). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
Parmigiani, D., Nicchia, E., Murgia, E., & Ingersoll, M. (2024). Formative assessment in higher education: an exploratory study within programs for professionals in education. Frontiers in Education, 9(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1366215
Putri, D. M., Prastikawati, E. F., & Wiyaka, W. (2023). Socrative as Online Formative Assessment to Foster Reading Comprehension. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 4(1), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v4i1.582
Roman, C., Delgado, M. A., & García-Morales, M. (2021). Socrative, a powerful digital tool for enriching the teaching–learning process and promoting interactive learning in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering studies. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1542–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22408
Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R., Geelan, D. R., Hine, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Carter-Thuiller, B., Gkintoni, E., & Xuan, Q. (2024). A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on the Impact of Formative Assessment on K-12 Students’ Learning: Toward Sustainable Quality Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718
Suryani, L., & Fauziati, E. (2022). Proceedings of the 7th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PROFUNEDU 2022). In Proceedings of the 7th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PROFUNEDU 2022). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-71-8
Vo, D. Van, & Simmie, G. M. (2025). Assessing Scientific Inquiry: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Tools and Techniques. In International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (Vol. 23, Issue 4). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10498-8
Wu, J., & Yu, X. (2025). The influence of formative assessment on academic performance: exploring the role of teachers’ emotional support. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(April), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567615
Zareie, F., Baghaei, R., Sheykhi, N., & Rasouli, D. (2025). The Impact of Audience Response System in Changing Students’ Attitudes Towards Lectures During Training Courses; A Before-After Study. Health Science Reports, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70366
Žerovnik, A. (2024). Technology-Enhanced Feedback System Usability in the Context of Self-Regulation Promotion. Education Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090948
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shynta Ayinda Puspa, Ana Ratna Wulan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Biodik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, copyright is retained by the authors and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
