The Effect of Video Modeling Example, Worked-Example, and Practice Problem on Mathematics Learning

Zakiya Amalia Hartanto Putri; Cecep Anwar Hadi Firdos  Santosa; Novaliyosi Novaliyosi

doi:10.22437/edumatica.v15i3.46296

Authors

Zakiya Amalia Hartanto Putri Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Cecep Anwar Hadi Firdos Santosa Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Novaliyosi Novaliyosi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v15i3.46296

Keywords:

video modeling example, worked-example, practice problem, self-efficacy, motivation

Abstract

Low learning results, learning motivation, and student confidence are frequently encountered when teaching mathematics in junior high school. To address these issues, it is vital to use learning methods that are appropriate for the student's qualities. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the impact of different learning strategies, such as video modelling examples, worked-examples, and practice problems, on students' self-efficacy, motivation, and learning outcomes in the cognitive parts of mathematics teaching. This study used a quantitative methodology and a quasi-experimental design. The study involved eighth-grade pupils from a junior high school in Serang City, who were divided into three classes and given different learning techniques. A learning outcomes exam, a self-efficacy questionnaire, and a motivation survey were used to collect data. To identify significant differences between groups, the obtained data were evaluated using a t-test, one-way ANOVA, and a post hoc Tukey HSD test. The study found that the three strategies had a substantial impact on self-efficacy, motivation, and learning results in the cognitive domain. The practice problem method is more effective at boosting self-efficacy, the video modelling example at raising learning motivation, and the worked example at enhancing learning results in cognitive areas. These findings emphasize the necessity of selecting instructional approaches that are consistent with the targeted learning objectives. Future research should look into the effectiveness of these methods across different topic areas, grade levels, or in combination with other pedagogical approaches to acquire a more complete knowledge of their effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, S. N., & Kusuma, A. B. (2021). Pentingnya Kemampuan Self-Efficacy Matematis Serta Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran Daring Matematika. JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal), 4(2), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.37081/mathedu.v4i2.2642

Aziz, T. A., & Azhar, E. (2021). The validity and reliability study of the Indonesian version of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy scale. 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041691

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control (1st ed.). New York: Worth Publisher.

Fazariyah, A., & Dewi, P. S. (2020). Studi Pendahuluan:Kontribusi Fasilitas Belajar Dan Tingkat Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR), 3(1), 36–41.

Fiorella, Logan., & Mayer, R. E. . (2015). Learning as a generative activity : eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (S. Kiefer, Ed.; Eight, Vol. 17). McGraw-Hill.

Herzamzam, D. A. (2021). Peningkatan Motivasi dan Self Efficacy Belajar Matematika melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2133–2144. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1177

Hidayat, A., Sa’diyah, M., & Lisnawati, S. (2020). Metode Pembelajaran Aktif Dan Kreatif Pada Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Di Kota Bogor. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v9i01.639

Hikmah, S. N., & Saputra, V. H. (2022). Studi Pendahuluan Hubungan Korelasi Motivasi Belajar Dan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR), 3(1), 7–11.

Hoogerheide, V., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2014). Comparing the effects of worked examples and modeling examples on learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 80–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.013

Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., van Nassau, H., & van Gog, T. (2018). Model-observer similarity and task-appropriateness in learning from video modeling examples: Do model and student gender affect test performance, self-efficacy, and perceived competence? Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.012

Jainiyah, Fahrudin, F., Ismiasih, & Ulfah, M. (2019). Peranan Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Belajar Siswa. DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(2), 1304–1309. https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v12i2.181

Kaiser, I., & Mayer, J. (2019). The Long-Term Benefit of Video Modeling Examples for Guided Inquiry. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00104

Kamsurya, M. A., Wijaya, A., Ramadhani, R., & Hukom, J. (2022). The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Students’ Mathematical Abilities: A Meta-Analysis Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(2), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202205

Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge. In TechTrends (1st ed., Vol. 65, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00565-6

Koedinger, K. R., Booth, J. L., & Klahr, D. (2013). Instructional Complexity and the Science to Constrain It. Science, 342(6161), 800–937. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238056

Lestari, D., Nurlita, M., & Muhlis, V. M. (2022). Effect of Mathematics Learning Using Learning Video Media on the Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(03), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v12i03.21784

Puspaningtyas, N. D., Dewi, P. S., & Maskar, S. (2021). Penerapan Metode Bimbingan Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Self-Efficacy Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2330–2341. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4144

Putri, F. M., & Safrizal. (2023). Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Minat Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas VI SD Nageri 12 Baruh-Bukit. Jurnal Riset Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (JURMIA), 3(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.32665/jurmia.v2i2.1346

Santosa, C. A. H. F., & Filiz, M. (2025). Investigating the limit of peer collaboration: Insight from worked-example in multivariable calculus. Infinity Journal, 14(2), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i2.p461-482

Santosa, C. A. H. F., Rafianti, I., & Yulistiany, D. (2022). Worked-Example Method on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in term of Students’ Initial Ability. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i2.33301

Santosa, C. A. H. F., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Syamsuri, S. (2018). The Role of Worked-Example in Enhancing Students’ Self-Explanation and Cognitive Efficiency in Calculus Instruction. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v0i0.19602

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011a). Cognitive Load Theory. In The Worked Example and Problem Completion Effects. New York.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011b). Cognitive Load Theory. In The Worked Example and Problem Completion Effects. New York.

Van Harsel, M., Hoogerheide, V., Janssen, E., Verkoeijen, P., & van Gog, T. (2022). How do higher education students regulate their learning with video modeling examples, worked examples, and practice problems? Instructional Science, 50(5), 703–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09589-2

Van Harsel, M., Hoogerheide, V., Verkoeijen, P., & van Gog, T. (2020). Examples, practice problems, or both? Effects on motivation and learning in shorter and longer sequences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3649