Technology-Assisted Inductive Learning: A Content Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Lesson Plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v15i3.47944Keywords:
inductive learning, innovation, lesson plan, prospective mathematics teachers, SDGs 4Abstract
The shift in learning paradigm from passive to active requires prospective teachers to design meaningful learning experiences, one of which is through a technology-assisted inductive approach. This study aims to analyze the content of lesson plans developed by prospective mathematics teachers to implement technology-supported inductive learning. Using a qualitative content analysis method, this study involved 15 prospective mathematics teacher students from the State Islamic University of Salatiga who had taken courses related to lesson planning. The data sources for this study were lesson plan documents based on inductive learning, including Problem-Based Learning and Discovery Learning. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify hidden patterns and themes. The results show that prospective teachers have integrated technology into each indicator of inductive learning, where the learning stages clearly begin from specific cases or problems to the generalization of concepts. This study contributes to providing an in-depth understanding of how prospective mathematics teachers translate inductive learning theory into lesson planning practices in the digital era, while also identifying aspects that need improvement in teacher training. Future research should investigate the relationship between the quality of lesson plan design and classroom teaching performance. Furthermore, comparative studies involving different technology platforms are needed to identify which tools best facilitate the conceptual discovery phase of inductive learning.
Downloads
References
Aldalur, I., & Perez, A. (2023). Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process. Heliyon, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13135
Andriyani, E., Muhaimin, & Syaiful. (2021). Pengaruh Model Self Regulated Learning dan Discovery Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. 11(03). https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/14599/12327
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach (Vol. 9).
Argaw, A. S., Haile, B. B., Ayalew, B. T., & Kuma, S. G. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem solving skills of physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a
Ari, A. A., & Katrancı, Y. (2014). The Opinions of Primary Mathematics Student-teachers on Problem-based Learning Method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.478
Arjunaidi, A. J., & Azid, N. (2022). The Implementation of an Inductive Model on Science Students’ Critical Thinking Skills during Online Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.9.1694
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2019). Technology-enabled mathematics education: Optimising student engagement. In Technology-enabled Mathematics Education (Issue 3).
Bilici, S. C., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050
Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 41(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0272-7
Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cáceres-Nakiche, K., Carcausto-Calla, W., Yabar Arrieta, S. R., & Lino Tupiño, R. M. (2024). The SAMR Model in Education Classrooms: Effects on Teaching Practice, Facilities, and Challenges. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i2.6816
Carriazo-Regino, Y., Hurtado-Carmona, D., & Bermudez-Quintero, A. (2024). Improving trigonometric competency with GeoGebra: a quasi-experimental study in a high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(5), 2876–2889. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.28995
Choi, J., Lee, J. H., & Kim, B. (2019). How does learner-centered education affect teacher self-efficacy?The case of project-based learning in Korea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.005
Diego Antonio Urdanivia, A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Paucar, F. H. R., Caceres, K. S. C., & Viza, R. M. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Dominguez, M., DiCapua, D., Leydon, G., Loomis, C., Longbrake, E. E., Schaefer, S. M., Becker, K. P., Detyniecki, K., Gottschalk, C., Salardini, A., Encandela, J. A., & Moeller, J. J. (2018). A Neurology Clerkship Curriculum Using Video-Based Lectures and Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT). MedEdPORTAL : The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 14, 10691. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10691
Emanet, E. A., & Kezer, F. (2021). The effects of student-centered teaching methods used in mathematics courses on mathematics achievement, attitude, and anxiety: a meta-analysis study. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.21.38.8.2
Emblen-Perry, K. (2022). Auditing a case study: Enhancing case-based learning in education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134944
Fadlilah, N., Sulisworo, D., & Maruto, G. (2020). The Effectiveness of a Video-based Laboratory on Discovery Learning to Enhance Learning Outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3648–3654. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080843
Ge, Y., Li, F., Li, X., & Li, W. (2021). What Is the Mechanism Underlying the Interleaving Effect in Category Induction: An Eye-Tracking and Behavioral Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.770885
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Hilton, J. T. (2016). A Case Study of the Application of SAMR and TPACK for Reflection on Technology Integration into Two Social Studies Classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2015.1124376
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). In Educational Psychologist (Vol. 42, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Iyanda, F. O., & Sam-Kayode, C. O. (2024). Investigating The Effects of Inductive and Deductive Teaching Strategies on Students’ Learning in Basic General Mathematics: Implication for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, VIII(XII). https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2023.81210
Kamarudin, M. Z., Mat Noor, M. S. A., & Omar, R. (2022). A scoping review of the effects of a technology-integrated, inquiry-based approach on primary pupils’ learning in science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 42(3), 828–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2138847
Kihoza, P., Zlotnikova, I., Bada, J., & Kalegele, K. (2016). Classroom ICT integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges from the perspectives of TPACK and SAMR models. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 107–128.
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology - Conceptual Foundation. In Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology: Vol. Online.
López Cupita, L. A. (2016). Just in Time Teaching: A Strategy to Encourage Students’ Engagement. HOW, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.19183/how.23.2.163
Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
Lusiana, R., Suprapto, E., & Sukristini, I. (2021). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ).
Lutfi, A., Ayu, A., & Sari, I. (2025). Comparative Effectiveness of PBL, PjBL, and Discovery Learning in Pesantren: Controlling for IQ. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.vl5i2.45436
Marnewick, C. (2023). Student experiences of project-based learning in agile project management education. Project Leadership and Society, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100096
Norhagen, S. L., Krumsvik, R. J., & Røkenes, F. M. (2024). Developing professional digital competence in Norwegian teacher education: a scoping review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363529
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Odegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S., & Sorvik, G. O. (2015). Budding Science and Literacy. A Classroom Video Study of the Challenges and Support in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.674
Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, A., Lagzdinyte-Budnike, I., Gaiziuniene, L., Sukacke, V., & Daniuseviciute-Brazaite, L. (2022). Assessing Education for Sustainable Development in Engineering Study Programs: A Case of AI Ecosystem Creation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031702
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2007). The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5).
Putri, F. A. E., & Siburian, J. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Online Inquiry dan Problem Based Learning (PBL). Edumatica: JurnalPendidikanMatematika, 11(1).
Richter, T., Nemeth, L., Berger, R., Ferri, R. B., Hänze, M., & Lipowsky, F. (2022). Using Interleaving to Promote Inductive Learning in Educational Contexts: Promises and Challenges. Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie, 54(4), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000260
Sapkota, B., & Hayes, A. H. (2024). Preservice teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection. School Science and Mathematics, 124(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12644
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The effects of a discovery learning module on geometry for improving students’ mathematical reasoning skills, communication and self-confidence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.12
Son, T. (2024). Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review Using the Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition Model. In Computers (Vol. 13, Issue 10). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13100270
Tabun, H. M., Taneo, P. N. L., & Daniel, F. (2020). The Ability of Student Math Literation on Problem Based Learning Model. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i1.6036
Thenetweeraphat, A. (2022). Teaching Techniques for Designing Physics Learning Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Pre-service Teachers’ Lesson Plans. Journal of Education Studies.
Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3
Wulandari, E. (2021). Model dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika:Teori dan Implementasi (Suwardi (ed.); 1st ed.).
Wulandari, E., Suyitno, A., & Mastur, Z. (2023). How difficult it is for prospective teachers to design inductive mathematics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2614. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0126306
Yelvalinda, Y., Pujiastuti, H., & Fatah, A. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap Pemahaman Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v9i1.6108
Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2019). Flipping an English writing class with technology-enhanced just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495654
Zulkiply, N. (2013). Effect of Interleaving Exemplars Presented as Auditory Text on Long- term Retention in Inductive Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.228
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Enika Wulandari, YL Sukestiyarno, Mariani Scholastika, Masrukan Masrukan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
