Evaluasi Modifikasi Metode Analisis Serat Kasar Bahan Pakan di Laboratorium Nutrisi Ternak Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep: Evaluation of Modified Methods for Analyzing Crude Fiber in Feed at Animal Nutrition Laboratory of Pangkep State Polytechnic of Agriculture

Rahma Fitriastuti; Nurbaya Udin; Windawati Alwi

doi:10.22437/jiiip.v29i1.37592

Authors

Rahma Fitriastuti Jurusan Peternakan, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan-Indonesia
Nurbaya Udin Jurusan Peternakan, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan-Indonesia
Windawati Alwi Jurusan Peternakan, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan-Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v29i1.37592

Keywords:

accuracy, feed, precision, crude fiber, method validation

Abstract

Background: Crude fiber in feedstuffs is the most important point in determining nutrient digestibility in livestock. The crude fiber analysis method in feed ingredients that is commonly used as a reference is the Weende Method. This reference method of crude fiber analysis requires quite a lot of reagent solutions. To improve the efficiency of chemical use and waste, it is necessary to modify the analysis method. The use of modified analytical methods needs to be done through validation of the method in the laboratory. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the modification of the Weende Method to reduce the number of samples and reagents, thereby reducing waste and increasing cost efficiency. Methods: This study analyzed several forage feed ingredients (indigofera flour, elephant grass and rice straw) using the Weende method and its modification conducted for 7 days. The accuracy test was carried out with a complete randomized design with two replications and data analysis with the T test. In addition, the method validation test was continued which included the recovery value and repeatability. Results: The results of the study showed that the modified method for analyzing roughage did not differ significantly from the reference method (Weende Method). The recovery values ranged from 99.60% to 100.58%, and the precision test yielded coefficient of variation (CV) values ranging from 0.38% to 0.74%. The precision values were lower than the CV of the Horwitz analysis, demonstrating that the modified method provided satisfactory repeatability. Conclusion: Finally, the modified method for analyzing roughage, which uses half the amount of reagents and samples, can be effectively utilized as an analysis method in the laboratory (in-house).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nurbaya Udin, Jurusan Peternakan, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan-Indonesia

Windawati Alwi, Jurusan Peternakan, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan-Indonesia

References

Banakar, P. S., Kumar, A., Shashank, C. G., & Lakhani, N. (2018). Physically effective fibre in ruminant nutrition: A review. Article in Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 18(4), 303 – 308. https:www.researchgate.net/publication/349097299

Diana Boes. (2021). Verifikasi dan Validasi Metode Pengujian Mendukung Penerapan ISO / IEC 17025 : 2017 Universitas Samratulangi-Manado In House Training 25-26 Oktober 2021 Dra Diana Boes MM Mengapa Metode Harus Divalidasi ( Diverifikasi ). https://lppm.unsrat.ac.id/psbkkwallacea/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/UNSRAT-OKTOBER-2021-Verifikasi_Validasi-Metode_Diana.pdf.

Dumadi, E. H., Abdullah, L., & Sukria, H. A. (2021). Kualitas Hijauan Rumput Gajah (Pennisetum purpureum) Berbeda Tipe Pertumbuhan: Review kuantitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 19(1), 6–13.

Fahey, G. C., Novotny, L., Layton, B., & Mertens, D. R. (2019). Critical factors in determining fiber content of feeds and foods and their ingredients. Journal of AOAC International, 102(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-0067

FAO. (2011). Quality assurance for animal feed analysis laboratories. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 14. In Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Faridah, D. N., Erawan, D., Sutriah, K., Hadi, A., & Budiantari, F. (2018). Implementasi SNI ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - Persyaratan Umum Kompetensi Laboratorium Pengujian dan Laboratorium Kalibrasi. In Badan Standarisasi Nasional.

Ferreira, K. C., Bento, J. A. C., De Jesus, L. S., & Bassinelo, P. Z. (2018). Dietary Fibers: Analysis Methods. Científic@ - Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(3), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.29247/2358-260x.2018v5i3.p174-179

Ginindza, M., Mbatha.K.R, & Ng’ambi, J. (2022). Dietary Crude Fiber Levels for Optimal Productivity of Male. Animals, 1–12.

Hiraoka, H., Fukunaka, R., Ishikuro, E., Enishi, O., & Goto, T. (2012). Improvement and validation of the method to determine neutral detergent fiber in feed. Animal Science Journal, 83(10), 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01019.x

Juliasih, N. L. G. R., Hidayat, D., Pirdaus, P., & Rinawati, R. (2021). Verification of the Determination Method of Dissolved Metal Content using ICP-OES and Its Application for River Water in Bandar Lampung City. Jurnal Kimia Sains Dan Aplikasi, 24(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/jksa.24.1.29-36

Mahmood, T., & Guo, Y. (2020). Dietary fiber and chicken microbiome interaction: Where will it lead to? Animal Nutrition, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2019.11.004

Manika, D. (2022). Method Verification and Measurement of Uncertainty Estimation for the Proximate Analysis in Animal Feed-Single Laboratory Verification Protocol (Nordtest Approach). “Austin Journal of Analytical and Pharmaceutical Chemistry,” 9(3). https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1148

Marcinkowska, R., Namieśnik, J., & Tobiszewski, M. (2019). Green and equitable analytical chemistry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 19, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.04.003

Möller, J. (2014). Comparing methods for fibre determination in food and feed. Foss, 1, 1–6.

Suharlina, S., & Sanusi, I. (2020). Kualitas Nutrisi Hijauan Indigofera zollingeriana Yang Diberi Pupuk Hayati Fungi Mikoriza Arbuskula. Jurnal Pertanian Terpadu, 8(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.36084/jpt..v8i1.219

Syafiyullah, R., Kumalasari, N. R., & Abdullah, L. (2021). Produksi Dan Kualitas Jerami Padi Sumber Hijauan Pakan Dengan Waktu Panen Dan Dosis Pupuk Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 19(3), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.19.3.85-89

Yanuartono, Y., Purnamaningsih, H., Indarjulianto, S., & Nururrozi, A. (2017). Potensi jerami sebagai pakan ternak ruminansia. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 27(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2017.027.01.05