Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Evaluasi Kelembagaan Peternakan dengan Pendekatan Bibliometrik Menggunakan VOSviewer Berbasis PICOS dan PRISMA
Systematic Literature Review (SLR): An Institutional Evaluation of the Livestock Sector Using a Bibliometric Approach with VOSviewer Based on PICOS and PRISMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v29i1.45519Keywords:
Analysis Bibliometrics, Institutional, Strengthening, Livestock, SLRAbstract
Background: Livestock institutions play a crucial role in supporting the sustainability of the livestock sector, yet they still face challenges such as institutional fragmentation, suboptimal coordination among stakeholders, and the pressures of climate change. This study aims to evaluate the strengthening of livestock institutions and its implications for sustainability and socio-economic aspects. The approach used is a bibliometric-based Systematic Literature Review (SLR) employing the PICOS framework, analyzing 125 articles from 2020 to early 2025 sourced from reputable journals, including Google Scholar. The selection process followed the PRISMA protocol, while bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer to identify patterns of interrelationships, clusters, and research trends. The analysis results revealed three main clusters: livestock production, livestock management and business, and institutional strengthening intersecting with sustainability aspects. The dominance of the production and management clusters indicates that institutional studies remain focused on technical and economic aspects, while the integration of sustainability dimensions is not yet optimal. Research gaps are evident in the limited studies on minor livestock such as sheep, as well as the lack of strong integration of digitalization and climate change adaptation issues. The low level of involvement of local actors, such as cooperatives and community-based organizations, also poses a challenge to institutional strengthening. A review of the literature confirms that effective institutional strengthening requires an inclusive, collaborative, and evidence-based approach, involving the strengthening of local institutional capacity and cross-sectoral integration. This approach is essential for accommodating commodity diversification, enhancing the resilience of the livestock system, and promoting sustainable, adaptive, and competitive livestock development.
Downloads
References
Adams, N., Sans, A., Trier Kreutzfeldt, K.-E., Arias Escobar, M. A., Oudshoorn, F. W., Bolduc, N., Aubert, P.-M., & Smith, L. G. (2024). Assessing the impacts of EU agricultural policies on the sustainability of the livestock sector: A review of the recent literature. Agriculture and Human Values, 42, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10595-y
Amam, A., & Rusdiana, S. (2022). Peranan kelembagaan peternakan, sebuah eksistensi bukan hanya mimpi: Ulasan dengan metode systematic literature review (SLR). Jurnal Peternakan, 19(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.24014/jupet.v19i1.14244
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2003). Reforming livestock policy: An agenda for action. https://www.fao.org/4/y8349e/y8349e.htm
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Pathways towards lower emissions: A global assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options from livestock agrifood systems. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9029en
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.-a). Sheep and goat production in developing countries. https://www.fao.org/4/t8600t/t8600T01.htm
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.-b). Sustainable livestock for sustainable development. https://www.fao.org/policy-support/policy-themes/sustainable-livestock/en
Gider, D., Krautscheid, L., & Nielsen, V. H. (2021). Report on research in the field of sustainable animal production (Deliverable 6.4, ERA-NET SusAn).
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0138237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Kristjanson, P., Waters-Bayer, A., Johnson, N., Tipilda, A., Njuki, J., Baltenweck, I., & MacMillan, S. (2014). Livestock and women’s livelihoods. In Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap (pp. 209–233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_9
Marino, R., Petrera, F., & Abeni, F. (2023). Scientific productions on precision livestock farming: An overview of the evolution and current state of research based on a bibliometric analysis. Animals, 13(14), 2280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142280
Moyo, S., & Swanepoel, F. J. C. (2010). Multifunctionality of livestock in developing communities. In The role of livestock in developing communities: Enhancing multifunctionality (p. 69). https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928424819
Neethirajan, S. (2023). The significance and ethics of digital livestock farming. AgriEngineering, 5(1), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5010032
Nisa, N. K., Nabila, C., Azahra, S., & Apriliani, F. (2025). Tinjauan literatur optimalisasi manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk peningkatan produktivitas dan keberlanjutan peternakan sapi perah. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen, 4(2), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.58192/ebismen.v4i2.3559
Novra, A. (2022). Arah dan kebijakan pembangunan agribisnis peternakan sapi potong nasional. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Agribisnis Peternakan (STAP) (Vol. 9, pp. 26–42). Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Place, S. E. (2024). Environmental sustainability of livestock systems. Meat and Muscle Biology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.18117
Place, S. E., McCabe, C. J., & Mitloehner, F. M. (2022). Symposium review: Defining a pathway to climate neutrality for US dairy cattle production. Journal of Dairy Science, 105, 8558–8568. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21413
Rizkwanti, R. A. K. D., & Kurniawan, A. R. (2025). Integrated rural development: Sebuah tinjauan literatur sistematis di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2025.011.01.1
Suherman, E., Maulana, D., & Bida, O. (2023). Pengembangan kelembagaan, partisipasi dan kemandirian kelompok tani dalam mendukung program integrasi sapi sawit. Journal of Administrative and Social Science, 4(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v4i2.399
Thornton, P. K. (2019). Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2853–2867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
World Bank. (2024). Moving towards sustainability: The livestock sector and the World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/moving-towards-sustainability-the-livestock-sector-and-the-world-bank
World Bank. (2024). New World Bank program supports sustainable fodder production in China. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2024/06/27/new-world-bank-program-supports-sustainable-fodder-production
World Bank. (2025). Laying foundation for the modern livestock sector in Nepal. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2025/02/19/laying-foundation-for-the-modern-livestock-sector-in-nepal
Zhang, W., et al. (2022). Industrialization trends in global livestock sector. Global Food Security, 33, 100634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100634
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anas Alvandika, Yusmi Nur Wakhidati, Mochamad Sugiarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
