Perbandingan Suhu, Kelembapan, dan Bobot Badan Ayam Broiler pada Kandang Closed House dengan dan tanpa Naungan : Comparison of Temperature, Humidity, and Broiler Chicken Body Weight in Closed House Systems with and wihout Tree Shade

Muhammad Rijalul Fikri; Elly Tugiyanti; Rahayu Widiyanti

doi:10.22437/jiiip.v29i1.47342

Authors

Muhammad Rijalul Fikri FakultasPeternakan,UniversitasJenderalSoedirman,Jawa Tengah-Indonesia
Elly Tugiyanti Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Jawa Tengah-Indonesia
Rahayu Widiyanti Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Jawa Tengah-Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v29i1.47342

Keywords:

Broiler Chickens, closed house, shading, temperature, humidity

Abstract

Background: Broiler chickens are fast-growing poultry that require optimal housing environmental conditions to support growth performance and production efficiency. Closed house systems are designed to control temperature, humidity, and ventilation. However, external environmental factors, such as the presence of tree shade, may influence the internal microclimate of the house, particularly by reducing heat exposure from direct solar radiation. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the microclimate conditions (temperature and humidity) and body weight of broiler chickens reared in closed house systems with and without tree shade. Methods:The study was conducted for 35 days in two closed house facilities, each housing 9,000 broiler chickens. Temperature and humidity were recorded daily, while body weight was measured at 35 days of age by randomly sampling 30 chickens from each house. Temperature and humidity data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test, whereas body weight data were analyzed using the Independent Sample T-test at a 5% significance level. Results: The average temperature and humidity in the shaded house tended to be lower than those in the unshaded house, although no statistically significant differences were observed. In contrast, broiler chickens reared in the shaded house exhibited higher body weight compared to those in the unshaded house. Conclusion: The presence of tree shade in closed house systems contributes to creating more favorable microclimate conditions and supports increased body weight in broiler chickens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cobb-Vantress. (2021). Cobb broiler management guide. Cobb-Vantress. https://www.cobb-vantress.com/resource/management-guides

Dewanti, A. C., Santoso, P. E., & Nova, K. (2014). Pengaruh berbagai jenis bahan litter terhadap respon fisiologis broiler fase finisher di closed house. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 2(3), 81–87.

Emami, N. K., Greene, E. S., Kogut, M. H., & Dridi, S. (2021). Heat stress and feed restriction distinctly affect performance, carcass and meat yield, intestinal integrity, and inflammatory (chemo) cytokines in broiler chickens. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 707757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.707757

Fajaryani, I., Sujana, E., & Setiawan, I. (2024). Deplesi dan indeks performa ayam broiler pada kandang closed house yang menggunakan dan tanpa menggunakan inverter exhaust fan. Jurnal Produksi Ternak Terapan, 5(1), 36–42.

Fatmaningsih, R., Riyanti, R., & Nova, K. (2016). Performa ayam pedaging pada sistem brooding konvensional dan thermos. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 4(3), 43–51.

Haque, M. H., Sarker, S., Islam, M. S., Islam, M. A., Karim, M. R., Kayesh, M. E.H., Shiddiky, M. J. A., Sawkat Anwer, M., & Anwer, M. S. (2020). Sustain-able antibiotic-free broiler meat production: Current trends, challenges,and possibilities in a developing country perspective. Biology, 9(11), 411.

Hariono, H., Priyambodo, D., Ulupi, N., & Afnan, R. (2024). Penerapan kesejahteraan hewan dalam manajemen ayam broiler. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science), 26(2), 98-111.

Nawab, A., Ibtisham, F., Li, G., Kieser, B., Wu, J., Liu, W., & An, L. (2018). Heat stress in poultry production: Mitigation strategies to overcome the future challenges facing the global poultry industry. Journal of thermal biology, 78, 131-139.

Oke, O. E., Akosile, O. A., Uyanga, V. A., Oke, F. O., Oni, A. I., Tona, K., & Onagbesan, O. M. (2024). Climate change and broiler production. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10(3).

Petek, M., Üstüner, H., & Yeşilbağ, D. (2014). Effects of stocking density and litter type on litter quality and growth performance of broiler chicken. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(5), 743–748.

Primaditya, F. M., & Hidanah, S. (2015). Analisis pendapatan dan produktivitas ayam petelur sistem closed house dengan penggunaan mesin pakan otomatis dan manual di Kuwik Farm, Kecamatan Badas, Pare. Agro Veteriner, 32, 99–106.

Rahmadha, A. P., Suchendra, D. R., & Sularsa, A. (2020). Sistem monitoring dan kendali suhu dan kelembaban pada kandang peternakan ayam broiler. Proceeding of Applied Science, 6(2), 3527–3535.

Revi, M. (2022). Analisis perbandingan efisiensi dan kinerja karyawan terhadap produktivitas ayam petelur menggunakan jenis kandang closed house dengan kandang open house dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam (Skripsi).

Sebayang, R. K., Zebua, O., & Soedjarwanto, N. (2016). Perancangan sistem pengaturan suhu kandang ayam berbasis mikrokontroler. Jurnal Informatika dan Teknik Elektro Terapan, 4(3), 225–232.

Willems, O. W., Miller, S. P., & Wood, B. J. (2013). Aspects of selection forfeed efficiency in meat producing poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal,69(1), 77–88.