Teacher Professionalism in the Perspective of Philosophy of Education: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/teknopedagogi.v15i2.48973Keywords:
Bibliometric Analysis, Philosophy of Education, SLNA, Teacher ProfessionalismAbstract
Teacher professionalism has long been understood not merely as technical skills but as ethical, epistemological, and ontological practice rooted in philosophy of education. However, previous studies tend to be fragmented between empirical investigations and philosophical reflections. This study employs SLNA, integrating systematic review and bibliometric analysis, to map the research landscape on teacher professionalism and examine its philosophical foundations. Literature searches were conducted through Scopus using a structured strategy, yielding 249 articles, of which 138 met inclusion criteria. Bibliometric analysis using VOS viewer identified four major thematic clusters: pedagogical competence, professional integrity, continuous development, and social responsibility. Temporally, research themes evolved from early focus on technical skills toward ethics, professional epistemology, and existential meaning of teaching. Systematic review findings indicate that teacher professional development interventions are positively associated with conceptual understanding, scientific process skills, and student engagement, with aggregated standardized effect estimates (Hedges’ g ≈ 0.67), indicating moderate-to-large positive impact. Philosophical analysis reinforces these findings by highlighting teachers' roles as moral agents, epistemic subjects, and ontological entities within educational praxis. SLNA integration demonstrates that teacher professionalism cannot be fully understood from empirical dimensions alone but requires strong philosophical foundations to address 21st-century educational challenges. This study provides comprehensive landscape of teacher professionalism while underscoring necessity of synthesizing empirical evidence and philosophical reflection as basis for advancing educational theory, policy, and practice.
Downloads
References
Biesta, G. (2015). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Biesta, G. (2020). Educational research: An unorthodox introduction. Bloomsbury.
Biesta, G. (2022). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156233
Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2020). Education in the digital age: Healthy and happy children. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/598919a7-en
Campbell, E. (2008). The Ethics of Teaching as a Moral Profession. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2008.00414.x
Cochran-Smith, M., Carney, M. C., Keefe, E. S., Burton, S., Chang, W. C., Fernández, M. B., Sánchez, J. G. (2021). Reclaiming Accountability in Teacher Education. The Wabash Center Journal on Teaching, 2(1), 2021. https://doi.org/10.31046/wabashcenter.v2i1.2853
Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Accountability in Teacher Education. Action in Teacher Education, 42(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1704464
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2021). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. In User guide. McGill University.
Kelchtermans, G. (2017). Professionalism, policy and politics in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110–123.
Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
Lee, S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
Loughran, J. (2019a). Pedagogy and professionalism in teacher education. Routledge.
Loughran, J. (2019b). Pedagogy and teacher education: Building learning communities. Routledge.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., Gøtzsche, P. C., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Nguyen, T. D., Pham, L. D., Crouch, M., & Springer, M. G. (2020). The correlates of teacher turnover: An updated and expanded Meta-analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 31(June), 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100355
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Britten, N. (2006). Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. ESRC Methods Programme, 2006, 93. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2022). Reimagining globalisation and education. Routledge.
Rodgers, C. (2020). The art of reflective teaching: Practicing presence. Teachers College Press.
Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732
Sánchez-Caballé, A., Gisbert, M., & Esteve-Mon, F. (2020). The digital competence of university students: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.1.63-74
Schleicher, A. (2021a). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing.
Schleicher, A. (2021b). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Schön, D. A. (2016). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (40th anniversary ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 1983).
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sockett, H. (1993). The moral base for teacher professionalism. Teachers College Press.
Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. (2015). Teachers professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044334
Trust, T., Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2017). Moving beyond silos: professional learning networks in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 35(May), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.001
Vermunt, J. D., Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. (2019). Connecting teacher learning and student learning: The role of teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102899.
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725
Wang, V. X., & Torrisi-Steele, G. (2022). Digital reflective practice in teacher professional learning: A review of recent literature. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 123–138.
Winch, C. (2017). Teachers’ know-how: A philosophical investigation. Wiley-Blackwell.
Zeichner, K., & Conklin, H. (2021). Teacher education research as a practice of freedom. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 93–125.
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (2020). Reflective teaching: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Zhao, Y. (2020). An education crisis is a terrible thing to waste: How radical changes can spark innovation. Teachers College Press.
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and for the 21st century: Global perspectives. King College London.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elni Septi, Muhammad Kristiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














