Turn-Taking dalam Proses Pembelajaran Dosen dan Mahasiswa Universitas Merangin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22437/pena.v15i2.47161Keywords:
Turn-taking, conversational interruptions, student academic discussions, cultural influencesAbstract
This study aims to analyze turn-taking patterns in academic discussions among students of the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Merangin. The method used is a qualitative case study, involving 35 seventh-semester students as respondents. Data were collected through audio-visual recordings and field notes, then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles & Huberman with the turn-taking theory of Sacks et al., (1974) as the main framework. The results revealed that the dominant turn-taking patterns were “selecting oneself as the next speaker” (MDSPB) and “speaker continuing his turn” (PMG), which often manifested as interruptions. Uniquely, these interruptions were not always perceived negatively and instead reflected active participation, where the dynamics were strongly influenced by contextual factors such as Jambi Malay cultural background, gender, and the closeness of social relationships between participants. These findings provide an important contribution to the development of pragmatics and discourse analysis by offering a new perspective that turn-taking patterns are not only seen as violations, but also as complex and contextual communication strategies. The implications of the research results can be used as teaching materials in Pragmatics lectures to enrich understanding of the dynamics of conversation in academic spaces.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, M. S., & HussaİN, K. H. (2020). Turn-taking: Teacher-student conversatİon. International
Journal of Humanities and Educational Research, 2(1), 26-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.1-2.2
Amir, H. S., & Jakob, J. C. (2020). Male and female teachers’ turn taking strategies in EFL classroom
interaction. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT) Vol, 19, 176-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3559128
Ariel, M. (2008). Pragmatics and grammar. In the series Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bungin, B. (2008). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Cresswell, JW. (2011). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y., (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd Edition).
London: Sage, 2005. 1288 pp. ISBN 07619 2757
Ekawati, R. (2018). Turn-taking in math tutorial session: A conversation analysis. Prosodi:
Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, 5(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v5i2.71
Fortuna, J. D. , Kamarudin, K, & Priyanto, P. (2023). Implikatur Percakapan Meminta Antara Guru Dan
Siswa Di Lingkungan Sma Al Falah Kota Jambi. Lingua Franca: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(1), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.30651/lf.v7i1.13287
Glanzberg, M., 2005. Focus: a case study on the semantics-pragmatics boundary. In: Szabo, Z.G. (Ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics. OUP, Oxford, pp. 72e110
Juanda, J. (2019). Analisis Percakapan Mahasiswa Urban dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Kelas: Studi
Kasus pada Mahasiswa FBS UNM di Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia. SOSIOHUMANIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 12(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.2121/sosiohumanika.v12i1.1148
Lakoff, R & Spender. (1973). Language and Woman Place. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Lee, J. J., & Mccabe, J. M. (2021). Who speaks and who listens: Revisiting the chilly climate in college
classrooms. Gender & society, 35(1), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220977
Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa sebagai alat komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia. Kampret Journal, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.35335/kampret.v1i1.8
Martinez, C. B. (2018). Cross-cultural analysis of turn-taking practices in English and Spanish
conversations. Vernacular: New Connections in Language, Literature, & Culture, 3(1), 5.
Maujud, H. F., & Sultan, S. (2019). Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis Makna Konteks dalam Bahasa (I). Mataram: Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mills, Sara. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Moradi, B., & Saeedi, Z. (2021). Beneath the Surface of Turn-Taking and Interruptions in
Intergenerational Conversations: The Case of Adult and Adolescent Females. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 9(2), 195-216. https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2021.27273.1320
Nugroho, R., Wardiani, R., & Setiawan, H. (2021). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Percakapan
Antarmahasiswa Semester Delapan STKIP PGRI Ponorogo. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 8(1).
Rani, A., & Arifin, B. Martutik. (2006). Analisis Wacana sebuah Kajian Bahasa dalam Pemakaian. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.
Rahardi, K. (2019). Mendeskripsi Peran Konteks Pragmatik: Menuju Perspektif
Cyberpragmatics. Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 3(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v3i2.2333
Ridlo, Ubaid. (2023). Metode Penelitian Studi Kasus: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Publica Indonesia Utama.
Rosanti, R., & Mulyani, E. R. (2023). A turn-taking strategy of conversation analysis in the
classroom. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 6(2), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v6i2.p213-219
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Dalam J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (hlm. 7–55). Academic Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R & D, dan Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanto, H. (2017). Alih Tutur dalam Wacana Interaksi Kelas di SMP. LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa,
Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 14(1), 27-38.
Tannen, Deborah, 2012. Turn-taking and intercultural discourse and communication. In:
Paulston, C.B., Kiesling, S.F., Rangel, E.S. (Eds.), The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication. Blackwell, Oxford.
Trinaldi, A., Wiryotinoyo, M., & Priyanto, P. (2020). PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DALAM BERDISKUSI SISWA KELAS VIII. Jurnal Bindo Sastra, 4(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.32502/jbs.v4i1.2306
Umar, A. A., & Ariyanti, L. (2022). TURN TAKING STRATEGIES BY EQWIP HUBS COMMUNITY. Paramasastra : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v9n1.p44-52
Wanto, A & Mustofa, A. (2022). Pola Alih Tutur Dalam Percakapan Remaja Tambah Luhur Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Habitus: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosiologi, & Antropologi, 6(1), 17-32.https://doi.org/10.20961/habitus.v6i1.60918
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction To Sociolinguistics (Seventh Edn).
Wiley Blackwell.
Wiemann, J. M., & Knapp, M. L. (1975). Turn-taking in conversations. Journal of Communication, 25(2),
75–92.
Yakushkina, M. (2021). Gender performance through turn-taking organisation in a foreign
language classroom. The Language Learning Journal, 49(2), 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1520915
Yusri. (2016). Ilmu Pragmatik dalam Perspektif Kesopanan Berbahasa. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggia Pratiwi, Hera Hartati, Herysa Oktawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
