Homonim dalam Bahasa Minangkabau di Nagari Tandikek: Kajian Semantik

Homonyms in the Minangkabau Language in the Nagari Tandikek: A Semantic Study

Authors

  • Isra Rizka Pratami Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Ade Kusmana Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Siti Fitriah Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22437/pena.v16i2.54564

Keywords:

Homonyms, Minangkabau, Semantics

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the semantic relationships of homonyms in the Minangkabau language as spoken in the village of Tandikek. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, focusing on the understanding of meaning, context, and language use among native speakers. Data were collected through observation and interviews, then analyzed using the distribution method and the equivalence method to determine word classes and meanings based on their contextual usage. The results indicate that there are ten homonymous words that share the same form but have distinct meanings and are not interrelated. These words are classified into four categories: noun–noun, noun–adjective, noun–verb, and verb. These findings suggest that homonymy does not occur solely within a single word class but can also involve shifts in grammatical function across word classes. Furthermore, this study confirms that context plays a crucial role in determining meaning, as identical word forms can potentially lead to ambiguity without the support of a clear speech situation. The novelty of this study lies in the use of linguistic data sourced directly from community speech in Nagari Tandikek, an area that has not been extensively studied. This study is expected to contribute to semantic research, particularly regarding semantic relations in regional languages, and to serve as a reference for the development of more contextually relevant language teaching materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ade Putri Pertiwi Supriadi, & La Yani Konisi. (2019). HOMONIM KATA DALAM BAHASA TOLAKI DIALEK MEKONGGA . Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa Dan Sastra), 4(1), 79–89.

Ahmadi, Y., Yasmadi, Y., & Fitri, T. (2024). Sociolinguistics in the digital era: Minang language as cultural identity. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 18(2), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v18i2.22990

Akhyaruddin, A., Yusra, H., Saputra, A. B., Pratama, D. R., & Permana, P. R. (2024). Bentuk dan Penggunaan Homonim dalam Bahasa Kerinci. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 250-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v6i2.4182

Anggraini, Z., Akbarjono, A., & Heriadi, M. (2024). Relasi Makna dalam Bahasa Serawai Dialek ‘AU’(Sinonim, Antonim, Dan Homonim) di Desa Pasar Pino Kecamatan Pino Raya Kabupaten Bengkulu Selatan. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 5(3), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v5i3.1075

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, A. (2018). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chindyani, M. G. (2017). Homonim Bahasa Dayak Muara. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (Jppk), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v6i3.18819

Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. (2024). Jumlah penduduk menurut nagari, jenis kelamin dan rasio jenis kelamin di Kecamatan Patamuan, 2024 [Dataset]. Satu Data Padang Pariaman. Diakses dari https://satudata.padangpariamankab.go.id

Eragamreddy, N. (2024). Exploring Pragmatics: Uncovering the layers of language and meaning. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(03), 1886-1895. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i3-50

Hamid, R. (2024). Dinamika Homonim, Homofon, dan Homograf dalam percakapan sehari-hari. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(1), 871-886. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i1.3390

Hermawan, A. I. (2021). Homonimi Bahasa Daerah MOI Papua Barat Kajian Semantik. Anafora: Jurnal penelitian Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.25134/ajpm.v1i2.2

Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus Linguistik (Edisi Ke-4). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Leech. (1983). Principles Of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Liang, X., Huang, F., Liu, D., & Xu, M. (2024). Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings. Brain and Language, 253, 105426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105426

Lyons, J. (1981). Language, Meaning And Context. London: Fontana.

Mahsun, M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, Dan Tekniknya. Depok: Pt Raja Grafindo Persada.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mulljana, S. (2016). Semantik (Ilmu Makna). Jakarta: Djambatan.

Nafinuddin, S. (2020). Pengantar Semantik (Pengertian, Hakikat, Dan Jenis). 18-19.

Nasarudin, N., Yulisna, R., Sartika, R., Sari, A. W., Satini, R., Anggraini, D., ... & Febriana, N. (2024). Pragmatik. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Palmer, G. (1981). Semantics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Pateda, M. (2011). Semantik Leksikal (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Pranowo, P. (2020). The role of contexts in interpreting pragmatic meanings. Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 13(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v13i2.12666[reference:0][reference:1

Rahardjo, M. (2010). Triangulasi Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Rahmat, S. (2025). HOMONYMS IN BUGIS LANGUAGE: A SEMANTIC STUDY. SIGEH ELT: Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 5(1), 534-546. https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v5i1.2946

Ramadani, F. (2020). HAKIKAT MAKNA DAN HUBUNGAN ANTAR MAKNA DALAM KAJIAN SEMANTIK BAHASA ARAB: HAKIKAT MAKNA DAN HUBUNGAN ANTAR MAKNA DALAM KAJIAN SEMANTIK BAHASA ARAB. Taqdir, 6(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.19109/taqdir.v6i1.5500

Resmiyati, R. (2020). The distinction between polysemy and homonymy on lexical ambiguity. . https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/5nfhj

Sibuea, P., Ayumi, F., Az-zahra, S., Nur, S., & Fitria, R. (2023). Analisis relasi makna dalam bahasa Mandailing. Al Yazidiy Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan, 5(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.55606/ay.v5i2.939

Sudaryanto (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahanakebudayaan secara linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Pratami, I. R., Kusmana, A., & Fitriah, S. (2026). Homonim dalam Bahasa Minangkabau di Nagari Tandikek: Kajian Semantik: Homonyms in the Minangkabau Language in the Nagari Tandikek: A Semantic Study. Pena : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.22437/pena.v16i2.54564