CUSTOMIZABLE WEB SIMULATION FOR DYNAMIC FLUIDS LEARNING USING VISUAL STUDIO CODE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v11i1.53381

Keywords:

ADDIE, Learning Media, Dynamics Fluid, Physics Learning

Abstract

This study aims to create and assess simulation-based learning media utilizing Visual Studio Code for creating dynamic fluid materials at the high school level. This development is centered on students’ misconceptions and the shortcomings of pre-built simulation platforms such as PhET and discontinued technologies (e.g., Adobe Flash). In contrast to previous studies, this research focuses on the development of an entirely customizable web-based simulation, created with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The simulation allows for teacher customization, access on multiple devices (responsive design), and offers the integration of interactive worksheets. The development of the simulation learning media was performed through the ADDIE development model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Construct validity analysis showed that most items were positively correlated with the total score, while reliability testing yielded a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.576, indicating the need for further instrument refinement. The evaluations made by students and teachers were classified as very good, indicating high acceptance and high practicality. This study is limited to evaluating media feasibility and media practicality, without evaluating the effect of media on student’s learning outcomes and conceptual understanding. The results of this study concluded that the media is feasible and practical to provide support for interactive conceptual visualization in physics learning. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the media through an experimental or quasi-experimental design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pariabti Palloan, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

Lecturer in the Department of Physics, Faculty  of  Mathematics  and  Natural  Sciences, State University of Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia      

Momang Yusuf, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

Lecturer in the Department of Physics, Faculty  of  Mathematics  and  Natural  Sciences, State University of Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia      

References

Anggreini, R., Malahayati, E. N., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Video Learning Media Simulation of Changes in Substance Form and Energy Form: Research And Development. JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 9(2), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.35457/josar.v9i2.3723

Anisa, M. K., Permana P, N. D., & Nova, T. L. (2020). Penggunaan Simulasi Virtual Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Siswa: Meta Analisis. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.163-170

Antonio, R. P. & Richelle R. Castro. (2023). Effectiveness of Virtual Simulations in Improving Secondary Students’ Achievement in Physics: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 533–556. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16229a

Aprita, D. F, Supriadi, B, & Prihandono, T. (2018). Identifikasi pemahaman konsep fluida dinamis menggunakan four tier test pada siswa SMA. 7(3), 315–321.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Asnita, Y., Sitompul, S. S., & Arsyid, S. B. (2023). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Menggunakan Google Form pada Materi Fluida Dinamis di SMA Kapuas Pontianak. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v4i1.56570

Astuti, R. M., & Djudin, T. (2017). Penerapan Model NHT Berbantuan Phet Dalam Remediasi Miskonsepsi Fluida Dinamis SMAN 1 Sungai Raya. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 7(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v6i1.17957

Branch, R. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Cook, D. A., & Hatala, R. (2016). Validation of educational assessments: A primer for simulation and beyond. Advances in Simulation, 1(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4. ed). SAGE.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Delvia, T. F., Mufit, F., & Bustari, M. (2021). Design and Validity of Physics Teaching Materials Based on Cognitive Conflict Integrated Virtual Laboratory in Atomic Nucleus. PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION, 14(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.24036/10354171074

Dewi, S. M., Harjono, A., & Gunawan, G. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Simulasi Virtual Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kreativitas Fisika Siswa SMAN 2 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(3), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i3.302

Fauji, R. A., & Nuryantini, A. Y. (2022). Use of Web-Based Virtual Simulation (Physics Classroom) to Improve Student Learning Outcomes on the Subject of Momentum, Impulse, and Collision. Gunung Djati Conference Series, 17(7). 23–37. https://conferences.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/gdcs

Gregory, R. J. (1992). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. Allyn and Bacon.

Harefa, A. R. (2019). Peran Ilmu Fisika Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari. Jurnal Warta, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i60.411

Herliana, F., Farhan, A., Mutiara, M., Nurulwati, N., Elisa, E., & Mahzum, E. (2025). Development of Physics Blended Discovery Learning Tools (PBDLT) in alignment with The Merdeka Curriculum. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 9(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i1.9816

Hidayah, N., Talakua, P., Azis, D. A., & Maipauw, M. M. (2025). Development of Interactive Learning Media Based on Augmented Simulation Using PhET for Magnetic Field Material. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 5(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v5i1.42588

Kankaraš, M., & Capecchi, S. (2025). Neither agree nor disagree: Use and misuse of the neutral response category in Likert-type scales. METRON, 83(1), 111–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Pandiangan, V. S., Hamid K., A., & Tanjung, S. (2025). Development of STEAM-Based Electronic Student Worksheets (E-LKPD) for Science Learning. FINGER : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(2), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.58723/finger.v4i2.406

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Trans. D. Coltman. Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Trans. D. Coltman., 186–186.

Putri R. A., Permana, H., & Nasbey, H. (2023). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Fluida Dinamis Dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier Untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Joint Prosiding IPS Dan Seminar Nasional Fisika, 11(1), PF–181. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.1102.PF25

Rabail Alam, Ghafoor, T M. (2019). Comparative Analysis Between Pre-test/Post-test Model and Post-test-only Model in Achieving the Learning Outcomes. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v35i1.855

Rahmawati, A. D., Ayu Febrianti, D., Faturahman, F., & Malik, A. (2023). Effect of Gap Width on the Distance between Bright Patterns in Yellow. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v5i2.249

Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.

Safriana, S., & Fatmi, N. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Materi Mekanika pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Melalui Force Concept Inventory dan Certainty of Response Index. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 6(2), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v6i2.11897

Sholihat, F. N., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Sub-Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03208

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. In Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Teutscher, D., Weckerle, T., Öz, Ö. F., & Krause, M. J. (2022). Interactive Scientific Visualization of Fluid Flow Simulation Data Using AR Technology-Open-Source Library OpenVisFlow. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(9), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6090081

Tipton, E., Hallberg, K., Hedges, L. V., & Chan, W. (2017). Implications of Small Samples for Generalization: Adjustments and Rules of Thumb. Evaluation Review, 41(5), 472–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X16655665

Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086

Ummah, R., Suarsini, E., & Lestari, S. R. (2020). Pengembangan E-modul Berbasis Penelitian Uji Antimikroba pada Matakuliah Mikrobiologi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(5), 572. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i5.13432

Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society. Harvard University Press. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wardani, A. D., Gunawan, I., Kusumaningrum, D. E., Benty, D. D. N., Sumarsono, R. B., Nurabadi, A., & Handayani, L. (2020). Student Learning Motivation: A Conceptual Paper: Proceedings of the 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020). 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.049

Weinfurt, K. P. (2021). Constructing arguments for the interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures in research: An application of modern validity theory. Quality of Life Research, 30(6), 1715–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02776-7

Wulandari, A., & Hamdi, -. (2021). Validity of Physics Mobile Learning Media Edupark of Bayangsani South Coast Fluid on Fluid Material for High School Students Using the Android Studio Application. PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION, 13(4), 475. https://doi.org/10.24036/10154171074

Y.H.M. Yusuf, K.A. Astiti, H.F. Lalus, & T. Haba. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Fisika Menggunakan Teori Polya Pada Materi Fluida Dinamik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v12i3.54706

Zahfa, F., Fauzi, A., Yansyah, E. A., Fadhillah, F., & Syahdilla, J. (2025). Validity and Reliability of Educational Evaluation Tests. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.56495/jrip.v5i1.829

Downloads

Published

2026-04-02

How to Cite

Rahimi, F. H., Palloan, P., Yusuf, M., & Pasarai, T. W. (2026). CUSTOMIZABLE WEB SIMULATION FOR DYNAMIC FLUIDS LEARNING USING VISUAL STUDIO CODE. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v11i1.53381